Go Back   Trawler Forum > Maintenance and Systems > Power Systems

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2016, 10:54 AM   #1
City: Abingdon, Virginia
Country: United States
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2
Lehman SP 135 vs. SP 225 turbo

In a 32' trawler, what are the advantages/disadvantages of these two engines? Maintenance issues? Parts? Longevity? Noise? Ease of operation? Etc. Thanks.

fdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2016, 11:08 AM   #2
Senior Member
Old deckhand's Avatar
City: Sitka
Country: Same
Vessel Model: Transpacific Marine Eagle 32
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 405
Our boat is a 32 foot trawler with the sp 135. It has plenty of hp for the hull, some may say over powered. The sp 135 is a non electronic engine with simple maintanance and good parts availability.

Old deckhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2016, 11:26 AM   #3
TF Site Team
Baker's Avatar
City: League City, Tx
Country: Texas
Vessel Model: Carver 356
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,968
The question is are you going to use the extra power. They are basically the same engines. But the higher powered one is turbocharged and maybe even intercooled??? I don't know the higher powered ones well. With a turbocharger and intercooler you are introducing things that could increase maintenance costs and potential problems. IOW, the engine is more complicated. So if you had a choice in a vacuum and you don't need the extra power, then the 135 would be the better choice. If you do want the extra power in a 32 foot boat, which I'd assume you are wanting to plane, then the 225 may be more desirable. You will find most people on here prefer the NA version of that engine. It has an excellent track record as a slow turning low load engine.
Prairie 29...Perkins 4236...Sold
Mainship Pilot 30...Yanmar 4LHA-STP...Sold
Carver 356...T-Cummins 330B
Baker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2016, 12:26 PM   #4
Senior Member
David Rive's Avatar
City: Markham
Country: Canada
Vessel Name: Waterthrush
Vessel Model: 1985 Ocean Alexander 38
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 133
I would always choose naturally aspirated (the 135) over turbo any day. I have two 135s on Waterthrush and they are a (relative) joy to maintain.
David Rive is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2016, 01:28 PM   #5
djmarchand's Avatar
City: Essex, Ct
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Bella
Vessel Model: Mainship Pilot 34
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,998
You can't really use the extra horsepower of the turbochrged Lehman. My buddy had a GB 32 with a Cummins 220 hp engine. He said that anything over 2,000 rpm just pushed a bigger hole in the water.

djmarchand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2016, 01:00 PM   #6
City: Abingdon, Virginia
Country: United States
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2
Thanks for the responses. fdw

fdw is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012