MVCalypso
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 120
- Location
- San Francisco Bay
- Vessel Name
- Calypso
- Vessel Make
- Island Gypsy 36 Europa 1984
A raw water pump on one of my Lehman 135s has developed a leak.
The price of a new pump is within a few $ of the labor + parts to rebuild the old pump. So, I've decided to go for the new pump.
I'll rebuild the old one at my leisure and have a spare pump.
The old pump(s) both have Speedseals on them. I really like the Speedeals, but alas, the company has gone away.
I'm considering reusing the Speedseal cover on the new pump (and keeping the stock cover in the spares kit).
It's been many years since the Speedseals were installed (2002) and here's what I remember / think I know:
Speedseals came in two revisions. The original was just the bronze cover and the impellers rub against the cover inside surface.
Later they made them with a teflon disk insert that was supposed to rotate with the impeller and hence reduce cover plate wear (or just move the wear to the non-impeller side of the rotating disk). I don't have the teflon insert version.
Frankly, the insert seems to me to be gilding the lilly, and not worth the extra complexity: 23+ years of service life for the solid cover feels pretty good.
I'm interested in figuring out what the orig inside surface of the 1st generation Speedseal was.
On the slim chance that anyone has a nice new, 1st gen Speedseal that's sitting in their spares, I'd love to see a picture of it!
There is some wear on my Speedseal cover where the impeller has worn against it. I'm trying to figure out if that really matters...
The Speeedseal is not leaking, and I've not had any problems with water pumping volume, so the wear amount doesn't appear to be causing any problem I can detect.
I figure "it depends on the amount of wear" - but how much wear, would be acceptable?
So I went to measure the wear... 1st step seemed to be to figure out "how much wear has occurred?".
What I don't remember and would like to know:
Was the Speedseal inside cover surface originally flat?
If so, I can measure the depth of the wear area and estimate how much the wear is for engine hours since 2002.
Or was the original inside surface recessed? Perhaps by the thickness of the stock cover paper gasket?
In which case, I can subtract the gasket thickness from the wear depth.
Perhaps, some clearance is needed between the cover and the impeller? How much?
You may wonder, why do I care?
Well, I may decide to machine a couple of Speedseal replacement covers...
This would only make sense as a "fun personal project" (where my labor is free and I already have the required machinery).
While thinking about this, I made the mistake of looking up the current small quantity price of bronze... OMG.
I can only imagine what a Speedseal would have to sell for today.
The price of a new pump is within a few $ of the labor + parts to rebuild the old pump. So, I've decided to go for the new pump.
I'll rebuild the old one at my leisure and have a spare pump.
The old pump(s) both have Speedseals on them. I really like the Speedeals, but alas, the company has gone away.
I'm considering reusing the Speedseal cover on the new pump (and keeping the stock cover in the spares kit).
It's been many years since the Speedseals were installed (2002) and here's what I remember / think I know:
Speedseals came in two revisions. The original was just the bronze cover and the impellers rub against the cover inside surface.
Later they made them with a teflon disk insert that was supposed to rotate with the impeller and hence reduce cover plate wear (or just move the wear to the non-impeller side of the rotating disk). I don't have the teflon insert version.
Frankly, the insert seems to me to be gilding the lilly, and not worth the extra complexity: 23+ years of service life for the solid cover feels pretty good.
I'm interested in figuring out what the orig inside surface of the 1st generation Speedseal was.
On the slim chance that anyone has a nice new, 1st gen Speedseal that's sitting in their spares, I'd love to see a picture of it!
There is some wear on my Speedseal cover where the impeller has worn against it. I'm trying to figure out if that really matters...
The Speeedseal is not leaking, and I've not had any problems with water pumping volume, so the wear amount doesn't appear to be causing any problem I can detect.
I figure "it depends on the amount of wear" - but how much wear, would be acceptable?
So I went to measure the wear... 1st step seemed to be to figure out "how much wear has occurred?".
What I don't remember and would like to know:
Was the Speedseal inside cover surface originally flat?
If so, I can measure the depth of the wear area and estimate how much the wear is for engine hours since 2002.
Or was the original inside surface recessed? Perhaps by the thickness of the stock cover paper gasket?
In which case, I can subtract the gasket thickness from the wear depth.
Perhaps, some clearance is needed between the cover and the impeller? How much?
You may wonder, why do I care?
Well, I may decide to machine a couple of Speedseal replacement covers...
This would only make sense as a "fun personal project" (where my labor is free and I already have the required machinery).
While thinking about this, I made the mistake of looking up the current small quantity price of bronze... OMG.
I can only imagine what a Speedseal would have to sell for today.