Read the fine print and ask! Named storms seems to be the typical exclusion recently.
The problem with liability insurance is you don’t know what you will be parked next to. We have a situation here we’re an old boat with the required $300,000 liability insurance was parked next to a new $2,000,000 boat. The old boat caught fire and burned the new boat. Insurance company is now going after old boat owners assets including their home.
I can bet that if you damage or kill a high wage earner that their spouse will try to sue for their anticipated lifetime earnings, if you have assets that make the suit worthwhile.
The problem with liability insurance is you don’t know what you will be parked next to. We have a situation here we’re an old boat with the required $300,000 liability insurance was parked next to a new $2,000,000 boat. The old boat caught fire and burned the new boat. Insurance company is now going after old boat owners assets including their home.
Often umbrella insurance is tough to get if a liveaboard and no other insurance except a car....and some of us dont even have one of those (by choice).
Even then limited ceilings may not be enough to protect you from all lawsuits.
So at some point you are exposed...just a matter of how much more you are willing to complicate your life. And even then you might not be able to get insurance to cover in excess of a million which seems attainable these days by most.
Wow! What a deal! I heard it goes up dramatically over 40'.. Maybe time to downsize
The problem with liability insurance is you don’t know what you will be parked next to. We have a situation here we’re an old boat with the required $300,000 liability insurance was parked next to a new $2,000,000 boat. The old boat caught fire and burned the new boat. Insurance company is now going after old boat owners assets including their home.
From experience if the old boat owner had had more than the required $300,000 insurance, say a $1,000,000 umbrella, the damaged boat owner's insurance company would have accepted the full insurance amount and not have gone after the old boat owner's personal assets. The old boat owner did save himself perhaps $150 in premiums by not having an umbrella policy.
Second as strange as it may seem there is a business reason for an insurance company not to bankrupt the individual who bought the $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 umbrella. Just not good publicity nor does it generally play well with juries.
My last experience with an umbrella policy, used to have one, I could not get the coverage I wanted and to switch out all the singular policies was a PIA.
Anyway, my real point is you never know what the upper number you might need really is, its just a guess.
Many people risk manage their exposure carefully and opt for lower insurance than try to hit a moving target.