Most all brands say that you can go 4 in parallel. I did find some support for the "safety in numbers" concept when installing LFP battery banks (my issue 1 in post #101). Then the issue is how does one know that a battery in the bank has "checked out." Since most BMSs have a reset feature, it could be that it would be back online in 30 seconds and one would never know.
Another item I came across on Marine How To was Rod saying that the maxim that "deep cycle lead batteries can't be used for starting" was a basically a myth. And the "dual purpose" lead battery is a hoax that feeds off of the same myth. My PO (an electrical engineer) seemed to have agreed. He installed (7 years ago) 4 FLA deep cycles in two banks. Either bank by itself can start my 80hp Lehman (I tried just to make sure). But I very rarely move the switch to isolate them, just keep it on "both" and go boating. I do carry a Noco jump starter in case somehow the bank(s) were too low. But the truth is that one simply needs enough CCA for starting, and that might take more than a single deep cycle lead battery. So, the maxim is really "
one needs enough deep cycle FLA batteries to start the engine."
For a long time, the maxim was that LFP should not be used for starting. Now, the "dual purpose" LFP has reached the market. Hmmmmm. There may be some historical basis for the LFP "can't start" argument. First, the older LFP batteries were generally in standard automotive sizes. Maybe it was difficult to get enough CCA out of a Group 24 size LFP. Second, the BMSs were smaller. But on a trawler, we aren't looking to fit a single Group 24 under the hood. There are now big hurkin' LFP drop-ins that have very robust BMSs. And we are looking at battery banks, not what fits in a car. Third, many of the "can't use LFP to crank" arguments are based on cars, motorcycles, and outboards that have very basic (i.e., dumb) alternators and maybe a single battery. Yes, that would be a problem.
So, like the "deep cycle FLA starter myth," is the starter limitation on LFP batteries also a myth?
Here is a battery that would make a substantial LFP bank. 6 of them, 3 in parallel in each bank, would provide about 1,500 usable amp hours, more than 6 times what I have now. Each battery has a 300 amp BMS. In theory, that could give me 1,800 CCA. I can't use that much to start my Lehman. Right now with the lead batteries, each bank has a 250A ANL fuse on it, so I know that I don't need (or want) the instant 1,800 amps that this battery bank could provide. The only reason to "re-fuse" would be to replace the ANL with T-class fuses (maybe also 250 amp?).
I would then simply put my two banks together, having already decided that a 6 battery bank gives me enough redundancy for "BMS shut down" protection. When starting, each of the LFP batteries would be responsible for its share of the cranking amperage. I've never seen 500 amps from my shunt when starting, but let's say it is cold out and the batteries are required to produce 500 amps (out of the 1,800 available) for a fraction of a second to start my Lehman. Big deal. If it is a big deal, why? I know that some LFP batteries state "not to be used as a starter battery," but does that mean "not to be used
individually as a starter battery?) Is there something about LFP chemistry that allows each battery's 300A BMS to basically say "Hey, this 83.3 amp momentary discharge is
going to a starter!! That is not allowed!!!"
Mark