- Joined
- May 11, 2019
- Messages
- 4,333
- Location
- United States
- Vessel Name
- Muirgen
- Vessel Make
- 50' Beebe Passagemaker
Since both of your tanks appeared to have failed from the inside out, I wonder if the application of a tank sealer to the inside of the tank, such as is regularly used on aluminum aircraft "wet wing" fuel tanks would have prevented the damage, or at least slowed it down enough to extend the life of the tank.
These coatings are used on wet wings with aluminum skin that is typically 0.038" to 0.050" thick.
By comparison, 3/16" in decimal thickness is 0.1875".
So your 3/16" fuel tank starts out almost FIVE TIMES thicker than the typical wet wing skin, yet still only lasts about the same number of years as a wet wing before resealing is required. (Typical wet wings go for 20 to 40 years before requiring resealing . . . )
So, assuming the sealer lasts only the amount of time it does on aircraft, it would STILL be at least 20 years before the 0.187" aluminum (3/16") would BEGIN to be attacked by whatever is eating through your tanks . . .
It is definitely something I would consider . . .
These coatings are used on wet wings with aluminum skin that is typically 0.038" to 0.050" thick.
By comparison, 3/16" in decimal thickness is 0.1875".
So your 3/16" fuel tank starts out almost FIVE TIMES thicker than the typical wet wing skin, yet still only lasts about the same number of years as a wet wing before resealing is required. (Typical wet wings go for 20 to 40 years before requiring resealing . . . )
So, assuming the sealer lasts only the amount of time it does on aircraft, it would STILL be at least 20 years before the 0.187" aluminum (3/16") would BEGIN to be attacked by whatever is eating through your tanks . . .
It is definitely something I would consider . . .