Epoch 460AH Marine V2

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
You probably don't need an 8D. What engine(s) to you have?
The only role for this battery is to start my Cummins QSB 380. Charge on the big start battery is maintained from the main bus with an old Blue Sea ACR. The engine alternator is regulated with a Balmar 614 and is wired directly to the main bus bar.
 
And no problems? Most love Epoch batteries and I've got to think they are loved because Epoch does what it takes to get it right.
 
And no problems? Most love Epoch batteries and I've got to think they are loved because Epoch does what it takes to get it right.
No problems so far. Install went smoothly, everything powered up as expected, Victron comms seem to "just work" so far. I've had the inverter forced to "inverter only" mode since yesterday to let things cycle a bit and also did a little load testing yesterday evening. So far everything seems to be performing great. Right now I'm using the Epoch BMS as the battery monitor. The Smartshunt is still wired into the system, but I need to re-route the power cable for it after the install, so it's not powered on right now.

Current status of the system is shown here. Only thing that's funky is the consumption graph on VRM is acting up. It's over-reporting consumption on some hours and missing it entirely on others. No idea if that's related to the changes or if it's just a VRM issue though.

1748872630695.png
 
That is really slick. All that is coming from the Epoch BMS? Once on line, the SmartShunt will feed into VRM too, right?

You have a Victron inverter/charger? My old Xantrex has nothing to tell VRM except the volts and amps other components sense from it.
 
That is really slick. All that is coming from the Epoch BMS? Once on line, the SmartShunt will feed into VRM too, right?

You have a Victron inverter/charger? My old Xantrex has nothing to tell VRM except the volts and amps other components sense from it.
The VRM data comes from the Cerbo GX, which gets data from the Epoch BMS, the Multiplus inverter/charger, the MPPT solar chargers, plus a couple of temperature sensors and such. The DC-DC chargers will also feed data to the Cerbo (and VRM) when I put those in this week, so I'll also have data on how much power is coming from the engine alternators. The Smartshunt will also feed battery data when I power it back up, but I'm not sure if it'll give me anything useful beyond what the Epoch BMS is already providing. If I find it doesn't then I might re-purpose the Smartshunt as a load meter somewhere at some point.
 
I'm struggling to define the difference between charge state from the battery BMS vs charge state from the SmartShunt. The SmartShunt is counting Coulombs and if your capacity figure is right, should be very accurate. I think the BMS is using voltage to display percent of capacity. Which is better?
 
I'm struggling to define the difference between charge state from the battery BMS vs charge state from the SmartShunt. The SmartShunt is counting Coulombs and if your capacity figure is right, should be very accurate. I think the BMS is using voltage to display percent of capacity. Which is better?
The BMS also has a current measuring shunt in it. I'm not sure what logic it uses to derive SOC though. From the video Barking_Sands linked earlier it appears that the 2 track pretty closely in most cases.
 
Keep in mind the victron shunts have settable parameters. You can fine tune the victron shunt. Not so with the Epoch internal shunt SOC. But typically lifepo4 batteries that track soc are notoriously poor at tracking soc over long periods. The v2 Elite does a very good job overall, but its reporting (Puekert)is on the conservative side imo. In other words, when you discharge from a full charge after 100% is set all the way to Low Voltage Cutoff....you will pass 0% soc and still continue discharging for a short period of time until bms hits LVC. Maybe 2 to 4 amp hours. Which I find to be ok....even desirable.

You can set either as battery monitor. I also like have both available in cerbo and just kind of look at them both in a fuzzy math kind of way. Never take soc as gospel. When SOC gets low, like less than 10%, start taking a peak at voltage too. Because as you begin to hit the lower knee, voltage will begin to drop fast and you'll be able to have a good idea at your landing point, within a few minutes.

Don't be afraid to try a discharge under light loads until protections kick in. Either inverter cut off or bms lvc. It gives you a good idea of how that looks at the true bottom end.
 
Today I got to watch the data in the app towards the end of the charge process. Here's what I'm seeing. Looks like 1 battery is a little out of balance, the other is a bit further out. But I don't see any cells highlighted in red to indicate balancing, which I would have expected. I expect they'll get closer with a few more cycles, but time will tell. I'll plan to leave things switched to inverter only for a few days so the batteries at least get a shallow cycle for the next few days.

1748884634050.png


1748884643759.png
 
Today I got to watch the data in the app towards the end of the charge process. Here's what I'm seeing. Looks like 1 battery is a little out of balance, the other is a bit further out. But I don't see any cells highlighted in red to indicate balancing, which I would have expected. I expect they'll get closer with a few more cycles, but time will tell. I'll plan to leave things switched to inverter only for a few days so the batteries at least get a shallow cycle for the next few days.

View attachment 165342

View attachment 165343
It takes a good 6 to 10 cycles to get these in balance. As a matter of fact its not unusual to have cell overvolt on the first 1 or 2 charges. I did mine on the bench prior to installing but you can just cycle them as is. You don't need to do big discharges ,but I'd recomend dropping to an soc of 89% or less so it initiates another bulk and absorption phase.
 
Last edited:
What number(s) are you looking for to indicate a good balance?
When mine are around 70-89% and charging via solar, the VDiff is 0.003~
I have my batteries on that solar priority setting. And right now are floating at 98% and the difference is 0.009 but I have seen 0.040
2025-06-02_10-28-51.jpg
I am not sure if the Ekranos and the lowest cell and highest cell is taking into account both batteries or just one battery. I'm at work and can't use the Epoch app right now.
 
And if I may ask a favor, can anyone see anything wrong with my solar panel settings for two V2 Epochs?Screenshot_20250602-103626.png
 
It takes a good 6 to 10 cycles to get these in balance. As a matter of fact its not unusual to have cell overvolt on the first 1 or 2 charges. I did mine on the bench prior to installing but you can just cycle them as is. You don't need to do big discharges ,but I'd recomend dropping to an soc of 89% or less so it initiates another bulk and absorption phase.
That's what I figured, I was just surprised not to see an indication of balancing in the app as others have mentioned that it shows which cells the balancer is working on. I haven't gotten a cell overvolt warning, although looking at where the high cell is on one of the batteries I must be close to the threshold.


What number(s) are you looking for to indicate a good balance?
When mine are around 70-89% and charging via solar, the VDiff is 0.003~
I have my batteries on that solar priority setting. And right now are floating at 98% and the difference is 0.009 but I have seen 0.040
View attachment 165344
I am not sure if the Ekranos and the lowest cell and highest cell is taking into account both batteries or just one battery. I'm at work and can't use the Epoch app right now.
On mine it does reflect both batteries for the high/low cell voltages. If it shows P00 that's the master battery, P01 is the first slave.
 
That's what I figured, I was just surprised not to see an indication of balancing in the app as others have mentioned that it shows which cells the balancer is working on. I haven't gotten a cell overvolt warning, although looking at where the high cell is on one of the batteries I must be close to the threshold.



On mine it does reflect both batteries for the high/low cell voltages. If it shows P00 that's the master battery, P01 is the first slave.
Hmmm. I am NOT seeing that on my screen. P01 is the only one. Unless those two cells are the ones the most out of balance. I will have to take a look once back at the boat.
 
For the 460, the cell arrangement is a pair of 230ah cells in parallel and then 4 of those pairs in series to make up 12v @460ah. There is one balance lead per pair. So the balance in this arrangement is never quite as tight as just a 4 cell 12v arrangement. As such a balance range of .015 to .035 at the top of absorption is typical.
Hmmm. I am NOT seeing that on my screen. P01 is the only one. Unless those two cells are the ones the most out of balance. I will have to take a look once back at the boat.
Yes it will just show highest and lowest in either battery.could be from same pack or different.
 
The batteries got delivered this morning, so I got to work making the shelves for them and doing the big part of the install. Firmware is updated, batteries are in place, connected and working. All went very smoothly. Wiring layout isn't perfect due to where the terminals ended up vs the previous batteries, but a future inverter upgrade will lead to the main battery wiring being changed anyway.

The batteries are sitting on shelves topped with soft neoprene foam to spread the load on the cases and the top side of each has one of the Epoch brackets screwed to the bulkhead behind the batteries. The top battery just barely touches that 2x6 running across above it for additional security. Tomorrow I'll add a piece for similar vertical security on the bottom battery and decide if I want to add anything for additional security against sideways movement.

At some point I need to figure out an extension for the Victron CAN bus cable, as it just barely reaches in my install and that's with it routed very poorly to minimize the length required. In my case the Cerbo isn't particularly close to the batteries, so I really need about 15 feet of cable for a clean install.

Next up will be the DC-DC charger install some time in the next few days.

View attachment 165289

View attachment 165290
Those cables look a little on the thin side. You sure about that?
Sorry my response got botched - was commenting that the picture cables look undersized. Probably just the photograph.
 
Sorry my response got botched - was commenting that the picture cables look undersized. Probably just the photograph.
The cables in my setup currently are 1/0, fused at 250A. With the rest of the currently installed equipment that's adequate. About the only way to blow that fuse would be to run the inverter at max load, turn on a few DC loads, and then run the windlass without any charging being supplied so all of the current comes from the batteries.

When the time comes to upgrade the inverter setup then I'll be re-doing that cabling with 4/0 from each battery to hot and ground buses, then 3 switches fed from there. Those will be the current house switch minus the inverter that currently goes through it (with the existing 1/0 and 250A fuse) and then each inverter will get its own switch, fuse, and 4/0 cable.
 
Today I got to watch the data in the app towards the end of the charge process. Here's what I'm seeing. Looks like 1 battery is a little out of balance, the other is a bit further out. But I don't see any cells highlighted in red to indicate balancing, which I would have expected. I expect they'll get closer with a few more cycles, but time will tell. I'll plan to leave things switched to inverter only for a few days so the batteries at least get a shallow cycle for the next few days.

View attachment 165342

View attachment 165343
I would say battery 1 is hugely out of balance, and battery 2 is a good bit out, but I can't see the 1st cell voltage.
 
I believe NEC rating is only 150A for 1/0 wire. In free air it's 195 amps. Either way that's quite a bit under 250A. And that's not accounting for continous use safety. I'm not worried about blowing the fuse I'm worried about melting that wire.

ABYC E-11 rates 4/0 for 250A
 
This is a great example of what leads to unexpected BMS disconnects while charging. Cell 3 is at 3.666 volts and should be about to trigger a BMS disconnect. Yet cell 1 still has a ways to go before it's fully charged, and cells 2 and 4 are kind of in the middle. The pack voltage is 14.2V and any chargers set to manufacturer's specs will still be charging at full output. Then POW, the BMS disconnects because cell 3 is over voltage. If there were an Allow to Charge signal, it would have deactivated when cell 3 reached full charge at around 3.6V, and further charging would be blocked. It's then up to the balancer to bleed off charge from Cell 3 and/or add charge to Cell 1.
 
That looks like shunt setting?
These are the MPPT Victron solar panel settings.
I am using the Epoch BMS.
How does that work? Does the Epoch BMS still control the charge going in from solar? I suppose it does and maybe these setting on the MPPT are in case the Victron BMS has to take over?

Lithium is brand new to me. FLA batteries is what I have had always.
 
These are the MPPT Victron solar panel settings.
I am using the Epoch BMS.
How does that work? Does the Epoch BMS still control the charge going in from solar? I suppose it does and maybe these setting on the MPPT are in case the Victron BMS has to take over?

Lithium is brand new to me. FLA batteries is what I have had always.
As long as you can select bms control, the mppt should also follow the 14.2/13.5 settings in bms.

Are you Suuure thats the mppt? Sure looks like shunt set up page..lol.
 
As long as you can select bms control, the mppt should also follow the 14.2/13.5 settings in bms.

Are you Suuure thats the mppt? Sure looks like shunt set up page..lol.
Well hell! You are correct. Work keeps getting in the way of me posting things here! :ROFLMAO:
Thanks for catching that!
Screenshot_20250602-152810.png
Hmmm. Know that I am looking at this. With the BMS control on yes, that could mean the smart shunt is running the show?
 
Well hell! You are correct. Work keeps getting in the way of me posting things here! :ROFLMAO:
Thanks for catching that!

Hmmm. Know that I am looking at this. With the BMS control on yes, that could mean the smart shunt is running the show?
It means it will follow the published CVL of the BMS. Which is the same 14.2 absorption and 13.5 float that the Cerbo and multiplus sees.
 
I'd turn the absorption time down to 30 minutes or an hour, also set the tail current at zero (I think it will only let you set it at 0.5%, but then will say disabled on that page).
 
I believe NEC rating is only 150A for 1/0 wire. In free air it's 195 amps. Either way that's quite a bit under 250A. And that's not accounting for continous use safety. I'm not worried about blowing the fuse I'm worried about melting that wire.

ABYC E-11 rates 4/0 for 250A
The Ancor technical data for the cable I'm using (105* C insulation rating) lists 285 amps for 1/0, 242 if in an engine space. That's assuming free air or a pair of cables together. The main cables aren't bundled anywhere in my setup, so they're within their ratings. Plus, achieving a continuous load of 200+ amps is rather challenging in my current setup.

This is a great example of what leads to unexpected BMS disconnects while charging. Cell 3 is at 3.666 volts and should be about to trigger a BMS disconnect. Yet cell 1 still has a ways to go before it's fully charged, and cells 2 and 4 are kind of in the middle. The pack voltage is 14.2V and any chargers set to manufacturer's specs will still be charging at full output. Then POW, the BMS disconnects because cell 3 is over voltage. If there were an Allow to Charge signal, it would have deactivated when cell 3 reached full charge at around 3.6V, and further charging would be blocked. It's then up to the balancer to bleed off charge from Cell 3 and/or add charge to Cell 1.
Agreed. I'm going to let these cycle a bit daily through the week and see if they get closer. The difference between highest and lowest cells on the second battery is about half of what is shown for the first (my mistake on the bad screenshot).

I expect I had to be right on the HVC threshold, but the batteries didn't throw any warnings or tell the Victron gear to stop charging. Or turn off the charge MOSFET. All of my charge sources are Victron, so the BMS and DVCC can stop charging without having to cut the charge MOSFET, but I'm not 100% sure how it'll actually behave in that situation.
 
Last night I hooked the Smartshunt power back up and did some testing on the VRM consumption reporting issue. It appears that if I set the primary battery monitor to the Epoch BMS, I see the issue. But if I use the Smartshunt as the battery monitor, the reporting is good. I noticed the values for "charged energy" reported by the Epoch BMS seem too low, which would explain one of the issues I was seeing (some of the power going into the batteries was being reported as consumption). I was also seeing low consumption values at times (such as some hours overnight showing no consumption, others showing close to expected).

It seems like while the BMS data for real-time current flow, voltage, etc. used for display and DVCC functionality is accurate, the data reported for total power flow in/out of the battery isn't accurate from the BMS, so the VRM consumption calculations don't work correctly. I'm going to let the system run for a few days with the Smartshunt as the primary battery monitor and after the batteries get to full charge today I'll see how the 2 monitors compare in terms of SOC over the next few days.
 
Back
Top Bottom