Hi Susan, welcome.* They are both good boats.* What is your cruising style?Susan wrote:
we're considering Nordic Tug 37 or Sabre 36 right now or any other "fast trawler"options. any comments
The Sabre 36 would be my choice although I am more familiar with the Sabre 40 &Susan wrote:We're considering Nordic Tug 37 or Sabre 36 right now or any other "fast trawler"options. any comments?
I have to agree with John on the American Tug 34. It has as much usable space as the NT37, so would be a good comparison. I do however prefer the exterior styling of the NT37 over the AT. I don't like any of the Nordics with the flybridge. It's out of place on that boat.Baker wrote:
If you really want to go fast(er), then get the Sabre. They are usually more properly powered for speed and they usually have a "speedier" shaped hull(read planing hull vs semi planing hull). Nordics are fine boats but you will cruise in the low teens and burn a LOT of fuel doing it. Sabres move throught the water slightly better so are more efficient at speed. And I know form follows function, but styling is also at issue here. Do you like the tug style or more the classic downeast style??? Nordics might have more beam so they likely have more interior volume.
Long story short, you can't lose with either. The NT37 happens to be my favorite of the NT lineup. It is big enough to have some room to spread out but not so big as to be intimidating on a daily basis. You just have to decide which is right for you. Also when considering the NT37, don't forget to take a look at the American Tug 34. Pretty much the same size boat....and potentially a better layout(IMO).
-- Edited by Baker on Wednesday 2nd of February 2011 08:18:53 PM
Carey wrote:
*
I don't like any of the Nordics with the flybridge. It's out of place on that boat.
Come on Carey, check out this NT37 with a flybridge....it increases the useability of the boat and I do think it ADDS to the appearance of the boat....simply an opinion on my part.Baker wrote:Carey wrote:I don't like any of the Nordics with the flybridge. It's out of place on that boat.
When we were in the looking stage we looked at several Nordic Tugs as well as American 34.Susan wrote:
Does anyone think it is imperative to have a flybridge?* We will be cruising in the Northwest.
Susan, the 36' Sabre flybridge sedan is a very livable boat.* Many have the extended roof that covers the cockpit.* It is nice to walk out onto the "back porch" The Mainship 35 had that also.* The Sabre will make a good turn of speed.* Enclosing the cockpit with Isenglass extends the living space in most all weather.Susan wrote:
The Sabre 36 we are considering is the sedan flybridge model.* The Nordic does not have the flybridge, but we are in the Northwest and think we may be able to do without, if the visibility is good enough for docking below.
I don't... but there are many who love their fly bridges.Susan wrote:Does anyone think it is imperative to have a fly-bridge?* We will be cruising in the Northwest.
I don't... but there are many who love their fly bridges.SeaHorse II wrote:Susan wrote:Does anyone think it is imperative to have a fly-bridge?* We will be cruising in the Northwest.
Most cruiser-type boats in the PNW have flying bridges if for no other reason than the manufacturer included them to make the boat appeaing in as many markets as possible.* A lot of people in the PNW use them.* But...... if one likes driving from a flying bridge (we don't) and prefers it to the lower helm it is imperative to have the flying bridge fully enclosed and heated if one intends to use the boat year round up here.* The most common means of doing this is with a canvas enclosure with clear, flexible windows.* And even if the boat is not going to be used year round, an enclosed flying bridge is still a good idea because even in July we can get chilly, if not cold, weather.* And rain is a year round proposition up here.* The best boating months (in my opinon) are April, May, June, and September.* All four of these months can see pretty cold weather and of course, the ever-present rain and wind.Susan wrote:
Does anyone think it is imperative to have a flybridge?* We will be cruising in the Northwest.
I'm with you on all points but the last.Marin wrote:
*to the flying bridge of a Nordic Tug the boat begins to look downright ridiculous in* my opinion.* Aesthetically.* Functionally it's probably just great.