My bow was too high to use a bridle in many crowded anchorages to get an acceptable swing radius.
Added a big a** attachment 1’ above the waterline connected to a 20’ nylon snubber. Used Dyneema soft shackle to (semi) permanently attach one end to the “bow eye” and a 5/16”Dyneema soft shackle to anchor chain.
I have a question for you. My bow is not too high to use a bridle, but I'd rather use a single snubber over the bow roller. Problem there is I have no good place to make it fast (windlass is between where the snubber would come up and the cleat which is aft of the windlass).
However I do have a strong bow eye about 1' from the waterline, as you do. So two questions, if you have a moment:
1) I see you are using a soft shackle at your bow attachment. I take you have spliced an eye into the line... with a thimble?
2) The other thing that bothers me (in my mind only, as I have not used this setup) is that with other boats where I was able to run the single snubber back up on deck, I would always have a really long snubber. But I wouldn't use it all on the normal deployment, it would just be on deck. What that meant was that I could easily let out another 50' or so of rode if need be, just by letting out rode and (the extra) snubber together.
So I kinda feel "trapped" by the idea that I would have to haul in rode, unfasten snubber, and only then let out more rode, re-fasten snubber, let out more rode for slack.
Okay, maybe that sounds dumb, but I keep thinking about it. And it's
not that I anchor every night on minimal scope assuming it will be a mill pond and then, surprise!, have to let out more rode; but there are still times when I do want to let some more rode out for one reason or another (and it could be at night or raining, someone else is dragging or has let out more scope and come close to me, or whatever).
*********
Just curious your thoughts on these points since you are successfully using this setup.
***********