1200 Miles SOLO OFFSHORE on an Old 70ft Yacht - Florida to Boston

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
For those who think the idea of single-handing 1200 nms down the US East Coast is anything short of irresponsible, at what point is it irresponsible? Guessing we all agree that sleeping while your boat's on autopilot on the ICW is irresponsible. At what point does it become responsible? Or perhaps you want to hire a delivery captain to move your boat 1000nms. Do you hire the guy who says "I don't need no stinking crew....."?

Another anology for those who like to cite all the people who single-handed with no bad outcomes: There's a jar on the candy counter with hundreds of jelly beans. One of them is poison and will kill you. Do you play the odds and take one?
I've single-handed my trawlers something like 30k miles over the last ten years, and would argue that being solo hasn't posed significant risk to me or others vs having crew aboard. Many of the risks and challenges encountered are independent of how many hands are aboard.

I wouldn't do the trip mentioned, for reasons of my own, and haven't watched the series. But I would be happy to do a thousand mile delivery where I could find appropriate stopping spots to maintain good sleep patterns, like on the ICW. I see no oversize risks in this.
 
Why I do watch his videos I believe this young man is reckless, I've What's the video of him out in 40 miles an hour winds I also watch ahim ride s electric bike in Bahamas. He is entertaining but I think he's an accident waiting to happen
 
Another anology for those who like to cite all the people who single-handed with no bad outcomes: There's a jar on the candy counter with hundreds of jelly beans. One of them is poison and will kill you. Do you play the odds and take one?

Peter
Everything you do entails risks, and most people are not very good at assessing them. Driving to the marina to board your boat is risky. Every time you leave the berth there is risk. We live in a very risk averse age, almost no perceived risk is acceptable to many people, yet they take fairly large risks on a regular basis without considering it. Being overweight for example, is statistically riskier than a well planned solo passage.
 
For those who think the idea of single-handing 1200 nms down the US East Coast is anything short of irresponsible, at what point is it irresponsible? Guessing we all agree that sleeping while your boat's on autopilot on the ICW is irresponsible. At what point does it become responsible? Or perhaps you want to hire a delivery captain to move your boat 1000nms. Do you hire the guy who says "I don't need no stinking crew....."?

Another anology for those who like to cite all the people who single-handed with no bad outcomes: There's a jar on the candy counter with hundreds of jelly beans. One of them is poison and will kill you. Do you play the odds and take one?

Perhaps the most famous singlehander of modern times was Bernard Motissier (sp?). He ran his boat onto a beach at least once while sleeping (he lost several boats over the years). It happens.....

Peter
How bout this guy, pretty famous, of course different time, and I won't give up the end of the story for those who don't know, but I bet 99% do know...after all you are all mariners. Watch this on your smart TV.



 
I don't watch much YouTube and have only seen about 20 mins of a past video after someone on here mentioned him and wasn’t interested in seeing more.

The risk factors of running a boat solo has come up here before. My journeys are short, but I do it all the time including at night.

As others have already noted, life has inherent risks. Many Americans in particular are doing their best to kill themselves with high fat, poor diets and lack of excercise. Thousands of them will be in a hospital today getting a procedure for their heart or some form of cancer or other ailment related to obesity. This in turn jacks up our medical costs (private and government) to insane levels that we all get to pay for. However, a very small percentage of sailors and boaters run their boats offshore solo and sleep without a watch and it gets you guys all stirred up.
 
How bout this guy, pretty famous, of course different time, and I won't give up the end of the story for those who don't know, but I bet 99% do know...after all you are all mariners. Watch this on your smart TV.
I visited his birth place recently in Nova Scotia. Kind of cool.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250826_194046595_AE.jpg
    IMG_20250826_194046595_AE.jpg
    184.1 KB · Views: 19
He was sailing his boat, solo, 125 years ago. I'm pretty sure there a few less 50,000hp 100,000 ton cargo ships cruising the waters at 22 knots, than there are today.

Still, have to wonder what happened to him.
 
He was sailing his boat, solo, 125 years ago. I'm pretty sure there a few less 50,000hp 100,000 ton cargo ships cruising the waters at 22 knots, than there are today.

Still, have to wonder what happened to him.
Moby Dick ate him.
 
@Mambo42 Curious your opinion what you felt were the things he setup correctly to mitigate the risk, and perhaps things he could have done in addition, or better.
What we saw in the time that I flew SAR is that people on boats did not take the sea serious. The one thing that we saw over and over again was not being prepared for something going wrong. No radios onboard or draining the batteries after they got into trouble. Having no clue where they were (read: poor navigational skills). Going out with a boat in conditions that the boat was not able to handle. Not knowing how to make simple repairs in case something went wrong.
We could understand that fishermen simply have to go out and face the dangers of the sea. Most of them did not have the money to buy a liferaft, to buy a radio, to buy flares, they would go out in boats that were in a bad condition and when the engine failed or the boat started to take on water, that was usually the end of it.

The pleasure boaters were 99 % of the time sailing vessels and also there we saw that the majority of them were totally unprepared for emergencies. They would not inform anyone when they would leave, which route they would take, when they planned to arrive or where they plannned to arrive, so when we got phone calls like: this boat left 2 months ago and has not arrived in A or in B'...........where are we going to search ?
We also saw that a lot of them did not have a simple handheld VHF with a spare battery. We never lost a single boat that had a radio, we found 100 % of them.
There are a couple of other things, but it basically boils down to bad preparation and not having any back up plans. They never asked themselves the question: 'what if'.

So when I saw the videos that Gus put out I was first of all impressed that he had actually thought of what he would do if something would happen. And if that would not work out...........what would he do then. In my time we never saw back up plans for back up plans.
Then his well thought of wake / sleep pattern with the radar/AIS + alarms displayed on his TV and speakers. He had actually calculated when the alarm should go off in order to give him ample time to react. That impressed me.

Of course there is his knowledge of engines and mechanics. He knows these engines inside out and he kept checking them continuously, carefully weighing the results of his inspections. How many people just open the hatch or the door, see if they see any water splashing around and leave it at that ? He did not do that.
Then came his weather calculation, his alternates and realisation he would be sleepy in a heavy traffic zone if he would continue. So he decided to switch off the engines, just float and go to sleep. He did that in an area where I know (because I have flown there as well) there is hardly any traffic. It is close to a military training zone, but Navy ships will have a much better look out than commercial ships. And he still had his alarms as back up in case something would come his way.
His decision to speed up in order to stay ahead of the weather was also well thought of and it showed me that he was still on top of everything, he was still making sound decisions.
From his earlier videos I know he has a lot of experience sailing in the dark, he is good at it, he can even easily dock the whole boat by himself in the dark, that is pretty impressive. It shows me he has total control over the boat.

The one thing I did not like, although the risk was minimal, is to go out on the bow. I know not a lot can happen, but if something would have happened to him at that moment, he could have gone overboard and that would have been the end of it. I know it is a 70' Broward, chances are minimal, but that was the one thing that I would not have done.

So based on what I have seen in my days finding and saving people on the water and comparing that with how Gus was prepared and how he did it, I can only say that he did a great job. I wish that all the people that we lost (read: never found) had taken his approach, a lot less people would have died.
 
I've been watching Gus' videos for quite a while so I've developed a great respect for his skills, focus, energy and good judgment. He's also very easy going and good natured so he might initially come off like a reckless cowboy to some, but he's definitely not. Browsing this discussion I kept thinking of one of my great celebrity crushes in college, Florence Arthaud, who despite all her years of experience and world-class sailing, fell overboard in the middle of the night in the Mediterranean "taking a pee" as she put it. She happened to have a waterproof cell phone with GPS in her hand (still novel in those days) or she would have never been found. For all her hours -- days, weeks, months -- of solo sailing on the high seas over thousands of miles, she was ultimately killed in a helicopter crash a few years later -- one of ten people killed in that accident.
 
Or he went into hiding so he didn’t get arrested for raping a little girl……again.
Actually just indecent exposure. On his last voyage, he left Bristol in poor health with the boat reportedly in very bad condition.

There is no doubt that some single handers have been run down by ships. But the incidence of this happening is somewhat less than being struck by lightening. Life itself is a risk - it ends badly for everyone - and the risk of a well planned solo offshore voyage is less than many of you take daily, and almost everyone takes occasionally.
 
The one thing I did not like, although the risk was minimal, is to go out on the bow. I know not a lot can happen, but if something would have happened to him at that moment, he could have gone overboard and that would have been the end of it.
Interesting that you say this. When I had my 65 footer (very similar to his Broward) I recall being about 30+ nm off the coast of Oregon and thinking to myself that going out on the bow would be nuts. I even instructed my crew that no one goes on deck without someone on watch. During that trip I also made a climb to the flybridge, nixed that one very quickly, and no one ever went up there again when out at sea.

Of course the seas were rather large, especially compared to the duck pond that I often experienced in the Channel off SoCal.

I absolutely LOVE pilothouses!
 
We tend to see the actions of others through the clouded lens of our own perceptions as they presently stand. I did things then that seem totally ludicrous today and actually probably were then but I did not perceive them that way at the time.
I sailed a Sunfish across Lake Michigan and back when I was 15. I did not tell anyone except a friend whom kept the secret. I had a life jacket on, a tent, water, food, a chart, a compass a tether, and paddle and a mirror. I was very adept at navigation and sailing that boat and could swim 30 miles I went from Leland past the foxes, between High Island and Beaver and over to a wild area near Manistique camped and sailed back the next day.
Looking back, smart? Oh hell no, I shake my head at the thought but at the time, I was very capable and confident of the trip.
 
I've single-handed my trawlers something like 30k miles over the last ten years, and would argue that being solo hasn't posed significant risk to me or others vs having crew aboard. Many of the risks and challenges encountered are independent of how many hands are aboard.

I wouldn't do the trip mentioned, for reasons of my own, and haven't watched the series. But I would be happy to do a thousand mile delivery where I could find appropriate stopping spots to maintain good sleep patterns, like on the ICW. I see no oversize risks in this.

I don't think it's the "solo-hood-ness" of the trip Gus took that folks are on about; more like the "1200 NM non-stop (alone) offshore" part of it.

Not much like a nightly sleepover along the ICW or similar...

-Chris
 
I don't think it's the "solo-hood-ness" of the trip Gus took that folks are on about; more like the "1200 NM non-stop (alone) offshore" part of it.

Not much like a nightly sleepover along the ICW or similar...

-Chris
Yeah, I should have kept my mouth shut. Peter's post got me monetarily riled.

I agree with Peter's concerns about sleep. I pushed it lots in my younger days, and there were certainly times when capacity and judgement were significantly impaired.

But that said I'd argue that a single-hander with sufficient wisdom, experience and preparation can do it far more safely than a newbie crew. And there's no shortage of them going up and down the coast 😯
 
Back
Top Bottom