New York Canal System

Beyond the Chicago closure there is bad news for the New York State Canals this year. Just saw these 2 updates on the Canal Corporation website-


Mariners are advised to use caution as reduced water levels in some portions of the Canal system, especially near the Erie Canal’s movable dams in the Mohawk Valley, may create swift or other unusual currents and/or expose hazards. This condition may exist until such time that the movable dams are installed, and water levels are raised to their normal summer navigation depths.
Mariners are further advised that navigation aids have not been installed on the Canal system, which includes Oneida and Cayuga Lakes, Jamesville and Delta Reservoirs, as well as the lights on the Sylvan Beach breakwater.
For updates and information, please visit Canals.NY.gov or follow us on Facebook or Twitter





NOTICE TO MARINERS – 2020 CANAL SEASON OPENING SCHEDULE The New York State Canal Corporation today announced that much of the 524-mile Canal system will open for through navigation of the locks by July 4, 2020 as maintenance and construction projects are set to resume on a regional basis under the “NY Forward Reopening” plan.
Canal Corporation crews and contractors will mobilize to work sites in the Capital Region, Mohawk Valley, Central NY, Finger Lakes, and Western NY regions as those areas reopen. Maintenance work that needs to be completed at specific Canal facilities varies by location and locks along the Erie, Champlain, Oswego, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals will open for passage in a staggered fashion. Announcements regarding specific lock or regional openings will be communicated through the Canal Corporation’s “Notice to Mariners” notification program available at www.canals.ny.gov.
OPENING SCHEDULE (TENTATIVE)
Capital Region – “NY Forward Reopening” Date TBD

• Erie Canal from Lock E-2 in Waterford to Lock E-9 in Rotterdam
• Champlain Canal from Lock C-1 in Waterford to Lock C-12 in Whitehall
  Mohawk Valley Region – Locks opening in phases, targeted for between July 4th & August 10th
• Erie Canal Lock E-10 in Cranesville through Sylvan Beach at Oneida Lake
  Central NY Region – Locks targeted for opening by July 4th
• Erie Canal from Oneida Lake to Lock E-25 in May’s Point
• Oswego Canal – except Lock O-7 in Oswego
  Finger Lakes Region – Locks targeted for opening by July 4th
• Erie Canal from Lock E-25 in May’s Point to Locks E-34/35 in Lockport – except Lock E-26 in Clyde
• Cayuga – Seneca Canal – except Locks CS-2/3 in Seneca Falls
  Western NY Region – “NY Forward Reopening” Date TBD
• Erie Canal Locks E-34/35 in Lockport through Tonawanda
  As maintenance and construction work commences, most boaters, paddlers, and anglers can access sections of the Canal system for recreational use today. Mariners are advised that some sections of the Canal system will have reduced water levels until such time as the Canal Corporation completes its projects. In addition, navigation aids are not currently in place, but will be installed on the Canal system as the regions open.
  All users of the Canal system and adjacent Empire State Trail are encouraged to practice social distancing while using boat launches, trails and other public resources.
  The Canal Corporation appreciates the public’s patience during this time and urges all users to register to receive updates through the “Notice to Mariners” notification program
  at www.canals.ny.gov.

For updates and information, please visit Canals.NY.gov or follow us on Facebook or Twitter




Wish I had better news.




Leonard

I love that phrase "much of the canal". Really? Its a canal. Opening 90 percent will leave folks stranded somewhere.

Well... crap. Even though I expected something like this, I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed. Looks like Sylphide and I won't be returning to home waters this summer. That's quite inconvenient.

Anybody want to buy my house?

That's like, "We don't have a plan, but we do have a plan to plan to have a plan at some point."

BandB said:

That's like, "We don't have a plan, but we do have a plan to plan to have a plan at some point."

Click to expand...

... Possibly.

BandB said:

That's like, "We don't have a plan, but we do have a plan to plan to have a plan at some point."

Click to expand...

In all fairness guys construction was shut down 2-3 mos ago... some sections just got the OK to resume construction yesterday and others are still closed with no firm date for resuming comstruction... when the region meets the criterion?
Can anyone plan firm dates in this environment.
It's not a matter of when they choose to just turn the switch on!

They've got a little more detail on the project status page they put up: Notice to Mariners

There's still some unknowns though. Getting the Eastern end of the Erie Canal open seems to be the biggest unknown, so yeah, I wouldn't count on being able to get Sylphide to home waters this year. Maybe you'll get lucky and have a window towards the end of the season before it's time to head back south.

Bacchus said:

In all fairness guys construction was shut down 2-3 mos ago... some sections just got the OK to resume construction yesterday and others are still closed with no firm date for resuming comstruction... when the region meets the criterion?
Can anyone plan firm dates in this environment.
It's not a matter of when they choose to just turn the switch on!

Click to expand...

No, no one can have firm dates but their announcement keeps getting attention and yet it doesn't provide any information for anyone thinking about transiting the canal except if one reads between the lines, it says "don't bet on it." It reminds me of Major League Baseball, so wanting to say something but having nothing they can really say.

We're the same when asked about our school plans. We're not going to announce plans for August. We shut down two months ago. We've still got 2 1/2 months to August. Not even half way there. What in the world would make us think we know what we can do then. We've got plan A, B, C, D and more but no plan we can go with now.

That's life as it is today.

BandB said:

No, no one can have firm dates but their announcement keeps getting attention and yet it doesn't provide any information for anyone thinking about transiting the canal except if one reads between the lines, it says "don't bet on it." It reminds me of Major League Baseball, so wanting to say something but having nothing they can really say.

We're the same when asked about our school plans. We're not going to announce plans for August. We shut down two months ago. We've stillcosts / got 2 1/2 months to August. Not even half way there. What in the world would make us think we know what we can do then. We've got plan A, B, C, D and more but no plan we can go with now.

That's life as it is today.

Click to expand...

I understand it has to be frustrating for those "counting" on the canal for transit but I believe the best interpretation is "we don't know when various locks / complete canal will be opened at this point - will let you know when we know more. Canal Corp is notorious for not wanting to predict anything - even some very short term closures due to relatively minor interruptions. They tell you when it goes down and again when it is ready to open.

I think many don't realize that this is a "recreation" canal system that costs/ loses $ Millions every year. In today's environment the priority isn't very high by any means.
If anyone has observed the state work crews you will understand that schedule is not their priority and have no incentive to meet anyone's schedule.
I have had to deal with NY State agencies at times and it's sad but they truly march to a different drummer and reason, logic nor common sense applies.
I have had some project folks report how much cheaper they can complete projects compared to private enterprise bids. When queried they are counting only the cost of material as workers labor is "fixed cost" in their mind - regardless of how many workers and how long it takes the cost of a project is only the material when the state does it vs total cost of a private contractor.
I have learned the hard way - You can't anyone reason with unreasonable people??

Bacchus said:

I understand it has to be frustrating for those "counting" on the canal for transit but I believe the best interpretation is "we don't know when various locks / complete canal will be opened at this point - will let you know when we know more. Canal Corp is notorious for not wanting to predict anything - even some very short term closures due to relatively minor interruptions. They tell you when it goes down and again when it is ready to open.

I think many don't realize that this is a "recreation" canal system that costs/ loses $ Millions every year. In today's environment the priority isn't very high by any means.
If anyone has observed the state work crews you will understand that schedule is not their priority and have no incentive to meet anyone's schedule.
I have had to deal with NY State agencies at times and it's sad but they truly march to a different drummer and reason, logic nor common sense applies.
I have had some project folks report how much cheaper they can complete projects compared to private enterprise bids. When queried they are counting only the cost of material as workers labor is "fixed cost" in their mind - regardless of how many workers and how long it takes the cost of a project is only the material when the state does it vs total cost of a private contractor.
I have learned the hard way - You can't anyone reason with unreasonable people??

Click to expand...

I don't disagree with anything you say. I would be perfectly ok if they just stated the canal would be closed for the summer. I think at best it will be a short season and the canal should not be a priority this year. I just hope that doesn't carry forward beyond the year.

Hey, the state of New York could just say they loose too much on the canal so they are going to shut down the whole system. Thankfully they have not done that since it is an incredible resource for us.

" I think at best it will be a short season and the canal should not be a priority this year. I just hope that doesn't carry forward beyond the year."

On the concern for the future we are in total agreement.
The HUGE deficit NY will be dealing with is likely affect many previously announced projects as well as many anticipated but not announced. I have to think that the major commitment reinvisioning the canal will at best be delayed and at worst may not survive the cuts... will have to wait and see I guess.

So glad I made the decision to reverse loop rather than wait it out

On thing we found last summer was the canal was quick to announce a lock closure due to a broken gate, valve, or whatever. The re-openings were almost never announced. Traffic going the other way was the notice. Fortunately it did not impact us at all.

Comodave said:

Hey, the state of New York could just say they loose too much on the canal so they are going to shut down the whole system. Thankfully they have not done that since it is an incredible resource for us.

Click to expand...

....an accurate assessment that belies the contention from the great loop boating community that they are a significant contributor to the economies along the circuit. If the transient community wants to continue the lifestyle...pay for the maintenance of the canal system.

I'm afraid as boaters we have a lot to worry about. The funds likely to be spent on the canals and the funds to be spent on dredging all the ICW's and all the rivers. In addition state or municipal marinas. Every state and city is facing a huge deficit.

NY Canal Corp just issued a Notice to Mariners with a detailed project list with est completion dates for all of the late opennings.
See
http://www.canals.ny.gov/news/Project_List_for_2020_Reopening.html
This is unprecedented in my 30 yrs of boating the NY Canals I have never seen them issue any estimates like this before... wonders never cease!

It's not 1 canal but a system of canals, so if "much" of it is open, some would be unaffected by the closed portions depending on your destination. For instance, if you are going from Lake Champlain to the Hudson River, you wouldn't care if the Eire canal was closed.

backinblue said:

It's not 1 canal but a system of canals, so if "much" of it is open, some would be unaffected by the closed portions depending on your destination. For instance, if you are going from Lake Champlain to the Hudson River, you wouldn't care if the Eire canal was closed.

Click to expand...

Very true but at the current time all sections have one or more locks closed that prevent transiting any distance or to any destination of significance. Champlain, Eastern Erie, Western Erie, Oswego and Cayuga-Seneca sections are all blocked.

I didn't look into details of where the closures are, I was replying to High Wire who said that if the system was only open 90% that people would be stranded. That's only true if the canal you need to transit is closed.

very true bachus!

The canals may not make a profit per se, but they are vital to many businesses along their routes. If the lock close permanently, so would many businesses which would have a negative impact on the state's economy. If it's really a money issue, which it probably isn't right now, they could sell usage permits (tolls) which have been waived in recent years.

backinblue said:

The canals may not make a profit per se, but they are vital to many businesses along their routes. If the lock close permanently, so would many businesses which would have a negative impact on the state's economy. If it's really a money issue, which it probably isn't right now, they could sell usage permits (tolls) which have been waived in recent years.

Click to expand...

The recreational fees do not come close and could never be increased to cover operating costs. Canada faces a similar situation and several yrs ago proposed a significant $increase (like 5-10X) which never happen due to backlash.
The other complicating factor is more projects along the canal are not boater specific... such as hike / bike trails that have no way to collect fees.
What NY doesn't report and I'd live to know how much they take in for lease $ for all business and recreational properties that adjoin the canal. My understanding is that those folks can't own canal bank... that belongs to NYS... they paid an annual fee to use it / have access.

Good point about the land. Any infrastructure or recreational assets have value to a state beyond a simple profit/loss. Think about a beach or a state park. They exist to attract people and to add to the quality of life. My point about a fee is that most boaters would not object to a modest toll that could at least help offset some of the costs. The fact that the fees have been waived shows that NY sees value in attracting boaters to use the canals.

backinblue said:

Good point about the land. Any infrastructure or recreational assets have value to a state beyond a simple profit/loss. Think about a beach or a state park. They exist to attract people and to add to the quality of life. My point about a fee is that most boaters would not object to a modest toll that could at least help offset some of the costs. The fact that the fees have been waived shows that NY sees value in attracting boaters to use the canals.

Click to expand...

OH I agree completely. Several yrs ago NY actually admitted it cost them more to manufacture and distribute the decals than they took in in fees!
Dropping them was a cost savings.
Similar to them dropping the entrance fee for State Park day use in some locations this yr. They no longer need gate attendants to collect a $7 fee from a few users. NY has never embraced to self-pay system used at many state & provincial facilities.

When you have to financially justify boating, you don't. When you have to financially justify keeping the canal open, you don't.

There are many things done for the enhancement of life that have no financial justification. Can you imagine if Central Park in NYC was converted to commercial real estate, what it's value would be? But the lives of NY'ers who have come to love and depend on it would be harmed. I just look around us at the parks and public beaches in Fort Lauderdale, but then all I have to do is look just west of the developed area. We have all the refuges and the Everglades and if someone was given the right to develop 1000 more acres west, they'd do so.

Certain things we just have to accept the intrinsic value to society.

BandB said:

When you have to financially justify boating, you don't. When you have to financially justify keeping the canal open, you don't.

There are many things done for the enhancement of life that have no financial justification. Can you imagine if Central Park in NYC was converted to commercial real estate, what it's value would be?

Certain things we just have to accept the intrinsic value to society.

Click to expand...

That's an interesting perspective but in the end someone has to come up with the capital for improvements and $ for operation and maintenance.
The issue in NYS is that leadership has long wanted to get those $ off the state budget because it affects it negatively. The Canal Corp was moved under the Thruway Authority decades ago. In NY "Authorities" operate outside of the NY legislative / budget process and they happened to have a fairly large $ budget... mission accomplished until the new "Mario Cuomo" bridge replacing the thruway Tappan Zee bridge threatened to raise thruway tolls to help funding and the truckers revolted claiming (accurately) that their tolls were being used to fund the NY Canals and threatened lawsuits.
NY leadership then moved the Canal Corp and the funding needs to the NY Power Authority... thus keeping it off the NYS budget.
It MAY only be a matter of time before a citizen or industrial lobby threatens similar lawsuits as utility rates are raised to help fund the canal maint, oper & improvements.
NY Gov Cuomo formerly pledged $$$Mils to "reinvent" the canal but not sure where that will end up given todays bleak budget picture in NYS?? Which was neg $6B before the Covid-19 crisis and is somewhere in the neighborhood of 2-3X the original debt currently.
Stay tuned to see where this will end up - it's not very clear currently.

Bacchus said:

Stay tuned to see where this will end up - it's not very clear currently.

Click to expand...

No, but no one will ever bee able to financially justify it. Ultimately some will decide what it's worth to them.

The other part of that is those that don't use it contributing and understanding others contribute to things they use.

Our governments are actively involved in our recreation, entertainment and the arts. Personally, I feel we should continue to maintain that which we have in all those areas. I don't feel we should make new commitments, build new facilities in these economic times.

Conceptually we agree to a high degree... howevet....

"Personally, I feel we should continue to maintain that which we have in all those areas. I don't feel we should make new commitments, build new facilities in these economic times."

The problem I see with the reality and implementation is there is little glory, photo ops, etc for maintaining while every "new" facility provides all of those.
And the sad part in NYS is once it is classified as parkland it can not be sold etc for any other purpose , even if the revenue is used to improve other higher use, higher value facilities. The downside there is NO requirement to maintain any facilities, features or amenities. The result is NYS owned golf courses sit idle and overgrown because after buying MANY golf courses the state changed their mind and state they are no longer interested in running golf courses and they can't be sold or transferred e en if the new entity commits to a dead restriction that it HAS to remain a public course but the state can just shut it down.

There has been a movement towards so called public private partnerships where private entities can operate a concession and collect the revenue with a small % being paid to the state. Most of these are short term and the concessionaire has no incentive to spend $ for maint or repairs. So when the club house, lodge etc falls in both parties walk away and it becomes simply "open park land" where you can walk your dog or hike but nothing else.
Unfortunately NYS continues to acquire new properties that they have little funds or interest in maintaining.

I signed up on the canal website to receive e mail updates on canal status.
I know some of you folks here are local and would appreciate you posting any intel in this thread.
My interest is that I sold my boat but the new owners have to take it to Clayton , NY so they need the eastern Erie and Oswego to be open.
In the meantime they have no interest in using it here in Mystic so we are staying aboard as caretakers until the canals open.
Thanks in advance for your input.