If you could do AIS from the start. Which setup makes sense.

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Streff

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
127
Location
USA
Vessel Make
Californian 45 MY
I need to change out one of the VHF units. This maybe a good opportunity to AIS of some form. The boat has a new Raymarine MFD and older 7” Garmin Chart plotter as backup. I also use an (or two) iPad w/ Navionics. Very easy to use and enlarge the screen, etc. Of note, I have a good working SH hailer. But it’s rarely used.

Which of the following setup would you consider reasonable. Does one need an AIS that transmits these days and going forward?

My choices are:
1. A new RAYMARINE VHF that also receives AIS data and includes a hailer function. This will show AIS targets on the RAYMARINE MFD and I can get rid of the current hailer. The VHF screen is too small for AIS functionality on its own. $$$

2. A basic SH/ICOM VHF and a stand-alone AIS receiver module (Raymarine or others). This will show AIS targets on the MFD. $$

3. A basic SH/ICOM VHF and a stand-alone WIFI AIS transreceiver. This will allow transmitting our AIS data, showing targets on the MRF and also on the the iPad (Via WIFI). $$$$

4. 3. A basic SH/ICOM VHF and a stand-alone Raymarine AIS transreceiver. This will allow transmitting our AIS data and showing targets on the MRF. $$$$$

I convinced myself that option 2 is the way to go. Then I started talking to a dealer who insisted that a transreceiver is the way to go. Preferably with WIFI. He made a good case but I am not fully convinced. Maybe I am being shortsighted.

A Raymarine AIS units will easily plug directly into the current backbone.. others will need additional cables/converters and need fiddling.

In your opinion, How important Is transmitting your AIS data? I read stories that it can be useful for commercial traffic to know where your boat is in situation where the Radar is not seeing as well. That’s pretty rare, I reckon but still.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Streff
 
If you have receive only, you're not offering any information (assistance) to boats around you.

We have a stand-alone AIS transceiver, and target info displays on our main plotter. At the time there weren't very many other options... like VHF radios with an AIS option.

-Chris
 
I recommend the transceiver option with a vote for one with WiFi. With that setup and a GPS source, it can be the only electronic device on in the anchorage and capable of providing your boat's location and status to others, a CPA warning for others transmitting AIS, and an anchor watch. Ours is a stand-alone unit with its own display, but that's not necessary to provide the functionality I'm suggesting if there's a mobile device app for the unit. Check user reviews for the units you're interested in, the supporting apps for your preferred mobile devices, and the integration with the hardware and marine network(s) you already have.

Greg.
 
Definitely a transceiver. It’s not AIS unless you are receiving AND transmitting.
 
Agreed, stand alone transceiver. If you anchor out, it's very low power consumption and alerts other vessels in low visibility situations to your presence. Also makes it easier for other vessels to radio call you by vessel name.

If you're paranoid about the government watching you or someone stealing your favorite fishing spot, you can always switch the transmit portion on and off.

Ted
 
As an FYI, I have a raymaine class b separate receive/transmit AIS feeding my Ray MFDs. Everything is off right now but the AIS still transmits. In other words, this is a viable option if you want to transmit from anchor without running a lot of electronics. Also, my system required a multiplexer/demultipler so the AIS transmit could share the VHF antenna.
 
Standard Horizon VHF

I just replaced my Ray 215 with a Standard Horizon Matrix Gx2000 Vhf and coupled it with a Quark-Elec QK-A026 AIS Receiver with NMEA Multiplexer + WiFi + GPS. I am very happy with the installation.
 
Definitely a transceiver. It’s not AIS unless you are receiving AND transmitting.

With the prices now so reasonable, go with a stand-alone transceiver. We have an Em-Trak AIS B transceiver and a Standard Horizon VHF with receiver.

The Em-Trak was about $400 several years ago, and less now.
 
As an FYI, I have a raymaine class b separate receive/transmit AIS feeding my Ray MFDs. Everything is off right now but the AIS still transmits. In other words, this is a viable option if you want to transmit from anchor without running a lot of electronics. Also, my system required a multiplexer/demultipler so the AIS transmit could share the VHF antenna.
BWO a follow up to Barabus' post....I do exactly the same thing and an example of all systems turned off while in the slip (or anchor) is this graphic from marine traffic I just downloaded, showing my boat in her slip.
 

Attachments

  • AIS.jpg
    AIS.jpg
    54.2 KB · Views: 53
I don't have one yet. Got the radar first.

I've have had this "discussion" before.
It's is not just about you seeing other vessels around you. If your unit is not transmitting then THEY cannot see you and it takes two to avoid a collision or some other problem.
 
I installed AIS about one year ago. I went with the Vesper XB8000 with WiFi. It allows me abilities that I like. It can be used as a network hub to allow the display of NEMA 0183 or 2000 info on various devices. It has it's own dedicated GPS antenna which also allows for a backup source to supply other devices. It has a built in anchor alarm that works great, while at the same time allows you the option of transmitting your signal or to turn the transmission off if you desire. It draws little power. With it, I get AIS target info on my laptop computer where I run Coastal Explorer and also on 2 IPads I use running Navionics.
Being able to transmit AIS allows other boaters (commercial as well as pleasure) to contact you on VHS by name. I have many times heard boaters failing to make contact with for example: "the white power boat with the blue stripe located near Point Atkinson". I would expect hailing them by name would improve the odds of making contact.
I am sure there are other brands that offer similar features, but Vesper mainly concentrates in the AIS arena and has a good reputation. However, like most AIS, you will need a dedicated AIS antenna (best option) or a special splitter to use the regular VHF antenna (unless the splitter is built into the unit).
For a more basic unit, the Em-Trak suggested by Peter looked like a good deal.
 
2. A basic SH/ICOM VHF and a stand-alone AIS receiver module (Raymarine or others). This will show AIS targets on the MFD. $$

If you choose to receive only, as in #2 above, it can be $ instead of $$ (and much simpler than #2) and still show up on your MFD (presuming it is not ancient).

Get a radio such as an Icom M506-21. This has a built in AIS receiver and NMEA 2000. You don't need any additional antenna (beyond your normal VHF antenna), nor o you need a splitter. NMEA 2000 will bring the AIS data to your modern MFD.

Standard Horizon I believe makes some models with NMEA 0183 if that works better for you. NMEA 2000 is preferable, IMO, especially if you already have a backbone.

Not saying whether or not you should choose receive only, but I can't think of any advantage to #2 over just something like the M506-21 and a NMEA connection to your MFD.
 
Wanted to add Furuno AIS to my Furuno radar, but no way to interface with the old analog screen. Couldn’t justify new radar when the old one works perfectly, so I added a standalone Vesper transceiver with screen and a Morad 162 MHz tuned antenna. Happy with the install, and seems to work fine.
 
My AIS purchases from the start were first a Standard Horizon VHF with receive-only AIS. It worked fine and displayed AIS targets on my MFD. As stated above, while this is better than no AIS, a much better solution is a Class B transceiver that also transmits your position to other boats. Mine is a Comnav that integrated with my Furuno system with using NMEA 0183. I didn't want to add yet one more VHF antenna for AIS so I used an antenna splitter, which works fine. A better solution though, in my opinion is to have a dedicated antenna, which reduces complexity and a possible failure point. Brand -wise, Vesper seems to be one of the market leaders for AIS B. I installed Comnav because I have their autopilot and like it, and it has worked fine.
 
Last edited:
Just added Raymarine Axiom Pro plus an AMEC B600 SOTDMA transceiver. It was very affordable (the AIS) and required no special adapters or converters.

And it works fantastic. Using it constantly on this trip.
 
You should consider the type of boating you do. If you boat at night, or end up in fog frequently, then AIS B is helpful. I believe radar is a lot more helpful, but that's not your question. (A hailer acting as foghorm is extremely helpful if you run in fog.)

If you are fair weather only, with small risk of fog, then I'm not convinced AIS B offers any benefit. Not many boats transmit so you still need to have Mark II eyeballs on board. I typically shut it off in the harbor as there are too many stationary targets that clutter the screen.

I'm fair weather with medium fog risk and I depend upon radar. I have AIS Receiver and the fast ferries might show up on MFD before I can spot them. If the price of AIS B drops significantly I would add it but presently I don't see a compelling safety benefit compared to radar.
 
Last edited:
Just added Raymarine Axiom Pro plus an AMEC B600 SOTDMA transceiver. It was very affordable (the AIS) and required no special adapters or converters.

And it works fantastic. Using it constantly on this trip.


Good to hear a review of the B600, as I've been looking at that same unit. One of the cheapest SOTDMA units out there, and unlike some, it will multiplex NMEA2000 data out over USB along with the AIS data, so it can be used to get data from your NMEA2000 network to a PC with OpenCPN.
 
You should consider the type of boating you do. If you boat at night, or end up in fog frequently, then AIS B is helpful. I believe radar is a lot more helpful, but that's not your question. (A hailer acting as foghorm is extremely helpful if you run in fog.)

If you are fair weather only, with small risk of fog, then I'm not convinced AIS B offers any benefit. Not many boats transmit so you still need to have Mark II eyeballs on board. I typically shut it off in the harbor as there are too many stationary targets that clutter the screen.

I'm fair weather with medium fog risk and I depend upon radar. I have AIS Receiver and the fast ferries might show up on MFD before I can spot them. If the price of AIS B drops significantly I would add it but presently I don't see a compelling safety benefit compared to radar.

:thumb:

So much depends on where and how you boat.
I use an app on my phone, Boatbeacon, that will give me CPA, identify AIS targets so that I could call them by name (never had to) and most boats the size of my own don't have AIS at all, so no benefit until crossing the commercial lanes. Curiosity about who is out there is easily satisfied with the App, and that also works from my living room, where I will never have a B transceiver, but can see the traffic going past.
 
Absolutely have a transciever AIS. We were crossing Lake Ontario in a very heavy rain. The radar was in a whiteout most of the time. We only saw 2 AIS targets the whole way across and one of them was a 700’ freighter that was on a collision course with us. We never saw it on radar. As we were watching the target my wife asked me what I was going to do. I said that I would call him in a minute. At that time he called us by name and asked where we were heading, our course was somewhat ambiguous since there were 6 to 7’ waves coming on our starboard quarter and pushing us around a lot. We told him that we were heading for a pass by an island. He replied that is what he thought and he would change course to pass behind us. We thanked him. We never saw him and never picked him up on radar. I don’t know if he saw us on radar or not but he did pick up our AIS data because he knew our boat name. Just not getting hit by a 700’ freighter was worth what we spent on the AIS... We have a Raymarine suite of electronics with a Raymarine AIS which made it plug and play.
 
Comodave has a good point. When it's raining hard enough to mess with radar's ability to pick up a plastic boat, AIS will likely still help.
 
At this moment my arse is hanging out on the edge of the river, clear of the channel but the river isn't that wide. The ONLY thing to be realistically concerned about is tows coming through here. Before, I'd hope they saw my anchor light. Now, they've been looking at me for a half hour at least wondering what I'm doing hanging out in the river. No surprises for anyone.

Well worth it to transmit.
BD
 
You gents are awesome in my book. Thank you so much for the great info and thoughts. It’s exactly what I was looking for. Great stuff. Our boating typically takes us from the Seattle area up the great BC Coast. We have some family & friends in the Vancouver area so that’s a key area for a Longish stop. One cannot completely avoid fog, or sudden inclement weather in PNW boating. So that’s a factor for installing a good AIS. This year, we were gearing up for a trip to Alaska. Not so much now.

I was particularly interested in the AMEC 600w AIS, it’s stand-alone splitter and possibly the wireless Garmin Go GPS (or the AMEC recommenced hardwire GPS). The 600W has WiFi and SOTDMA ... not sure about an anchor drag alarm. I am not very good at anchoring yet, so that would be a great option. The AMEC seems decent, good reviews and affordable Compared to other units.

For VHF, I was thinking of the ICOM M-330G.. nothing fancy but it has a built in GPS. Or preferably a VHF unit that also has a Hailer.. that way, I can use the space of the current hailer.

I have a newish (2018) Raymarine Glass bridge gs-165 for the MFD with a new Ray GPS and Ray HD Radar. I am hopeful that connecting the AMEC to it would be straightforward.

I will probably pull the trigger on this Monday or so.. hoping to get everything installed by end of May.

Thanks again, truly very valuable insight .

Streff
 
Ditto on the vesper AIS unit! There’s a cell phone app to hook into the unit’s Wi-Fi which includes an anchor alarm. I put my phone next to my bed, and have peace of mind (well, as regards my anchor holding, anyway!) .
 
For those of you who started with a VHF with AIS receive and subsequently added a standalone AIS transceiver with its own antenna, can the two be on at the same time or do you have to disable the AIS receive function in the VHF? I'm wondering if the transceiver, when transmitting a data packet, would overwhelm or otherwise confuse the VHF.
 
I too think Commodave offered a very important illustration of why to have an AIS transmitting/receiving type. Maybe he would not have been run down but maybe he would have been were it not for his units ability to transmit so the freighter knew he was there and where.

Most of us may not have been out in conditions like he described but if you are going to get an AIS then get one that tells both ways.
 
When it's raining hard enough to mess with radar's ability to pick up a plastic boat, AIS will likely still help.
It sure does!
We were coming back from Catalina Island a few years ago, in a real gully washer. Even with the radar's rain filter turned on we could hardly make out other boats in the channel. The AIS, however, painted them like there was no rain. When I got the boat back in the slip, the rain was coming down even harder so before shutting down I took a photo of my MFD. As you can see, rain doesn't seem to bother AIS. It's important to be aware that a lot of boats don't have AIS and thus will not be seen in those conditions.
 

Attachments

  • AIS All.jpg
    AIS All.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 31
I have a Garmin AIS B on our boat - seeing and being seen. :)

All of our boating is done in SE AK so I view AIS B as part
of the vessels safety equipment.
 
You gents are awesome in my book. Thank you so much for the great info and thoughts. It’s exactly what I was looking for. Great stuff. Our boating typically takes us from the Seattle area up the great BC Coast. We have some family & friends in the Vancouver area so that’s a key area for a Longish stop. One cannot completely avoid fog, or sudden inclement weather in PNW boating. So that’s a factor for installing a good AIS. This year, we were gearing up for a trip to Alaska. Not so much now.

I was particularly interested in the AMEC 600w AIS, it’s stand-alone splitter and possibly the wireless Garmin Go GPS (or the AMEC recommenced hardwire GPS). The 600W has WiFi and SOTDMA ... not sure about an anchor drag alarm. I am not very good at anchoring yet, so that would be a great option. The AMEC seems decent, good reviews and affordable Compared to other units.

For VHF, I was thinking of the ICOM M-330G.. nothing fancy but it has a built in GPS. Or preferably a VHF unit that also has a Hailer.. that way, I can use the space of the current hailer.

I have a newish (2018) Raymarine Glass bridge gs-165 for the MFD with a new Ray GPS and Ray HD Radar. I am hopeful that connecting the AMEC to it would be straightforward.

I will probably pull the trigger on this Monday or so.. hoping to get everything installed by end of May.

Thanks again, truly very valuable insight .

Streff

Your plan sounds reasonable- but put in the stand-alone AIS antenna. I'm not a fan of comm gear sharing an antenna.
 
+1 on the separate antenna. The VHF is one of the most important rescue devices on your boat. I don’t want any signal loss on it. In the scheme of boating the cost isn’t that much.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom