Glassing Over Through Hulls

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
805
Vessel Make
Ocean Alexander 38'
I'm pulling the boat this weekend and was thinking of glassing over a couple old through hulls. I did a search for info but didn't come up with much. Can anyone point me in the right direction to research this? Thanks
 
I have done about 8 or 9 pn our boat. Basically grind down halfway on the inside and halfway on the outside. Do about a 12:1 taper on each side. If 1/4” thick grind out 3” on each side. I put a piece of plastic on the outside flush with the middle and then lay in 1708 glass with epoxy. You will have progressively smaller circles of glass. Lay them in until it is built up flush. Then remove the plastic and do the other side. Most epoxies leave an amine blush that needs to be scrubbed off with water and a brush after they cure before doing any fairing.
 
Do a YouTube search on Fiberglass Through hull. Many examples.
I'm a fan of anything by Boatworks.

 
I’ve also removed many thru hulls and do it pretty much the same way Dave described except I use polyester resin and 1 1/2 ounce mat and start with small. circles and go larger as I build them up.
No more than 4 layers at a time and let them cure before adding more so the resin doesn’t crack.
Then gelcoat after it’s layed up and sanded smooth.
 
I agree with Leonard in that 1708 will work fine but you might find it easier to wet out the 1 1/2 oz material. Although, I would warn against doing repairs with polyester resin. Epoxy resin will provide better adhesion to the cured fiberglas hull.
 
I agree with Leonard in that 1708 will work fine but you might find it easier to wet out the 1 1/2 oz material. Although, I would warn against doing repairs with polyester resin. Epoxy resin will provide better adhesion to the cured fiberglas hull.

I don’t like to mix materials if I don’t have to and never had an adhesion problem. My repairs are stronger than the hull.
 
I don’t have a hard time wetting out 1708 with epoxy. But I always am looking for the best and strongest and I don’t mind paying a bit more. But it is probably overkill...
 
At some point even the pros I know suggest using similar materias to prevent stresses developing from uneven forces.
 
I don’t like to mix materials if I don’t have to and never had an adhesion problem. My repairs are stronger than the hull.

By "mixing materials," are you referring to using epoxy resin in a repair on a boat originally laminated with polyester resin? And then saying you therefore prefer to use polyester?

I don't share that thought. The reason I say that is that once the polyester resin is past the chemical bond stage (which would have been around the day after it was laid up), then you aren't bonding like to like. The primary bond/chemical bond stage is long over, and anything applied is a secondary/mechanical bond. So at that point (now) it's about what will adhere the best to cured polyester resin (and of course have other desirable properties) in a secondary/mechanical bond situation.

I believe epoxy makes a stronger bond in this case. Obviously polyester can work (yards often prefer it because a job can be completed faster due to quicker cure - which is understandable when time is being billed by the minute). But I think epoxy bonds better, and working on my own boat it's not as important to avoid billing an extra hour.

Either way, prep is king. De-wax, sand, fillets for gradual transitions, etc.
 
At some point even the pros I know suggest using similar materias to prevent stresses developing from uneven forces.

So it's important to know what was used to construct the hull?
 
One of the reasons that pro yards use polyester or vinylester is that gel coat will adhere well to it where it won't adhere well over epoxy. When doing a repair on a late model boat, it is best to stick with gel coat finish to match and appear factory. This doesn't mater as much below the waterline on a boat with bottom paint because you aren't trying to match the finish like a topside, deck or house repair. Most gel coat is polyester based and therefore just as prone to absorb water as polyester so there really is no sense in applying gel coat under bottom paint, you may as well go straight to barrier coat or bottom paint.

My personal preference is vinylester, it is right between polyester and epoxy in terms of strength, cost and it is more predictable to work with than polyester. Unfortunately it is hard to come by, quality boat yards use it all the time and sometimes you can buy some off of them.
 
Biggest problem with vinylester is shelf life. The venders I use tell me 6 months. And that is time from manufacturer not time since opened.
 
Biggest problem with vinylester is shelf life. The venders I use tell me 6 months. And that is time from manufacturer not time since opened.

They all have a self life. I find if they are kept cool they last a long time. I've had polyester and vinylester last a couple of years at New England "basement temperatures" (approx 55 F)
 
By "mixing materials," are you referring to using epoxy resin in a repair on a boat originally laminated with polyester resin? And then saying you therefore prefer to use polyester?

Yes that is my personal preference. I'm used to a "freeze/thaw" environment and I feel using like materials will keep internal stresses down a bit.
It has been successful for me in the past and I'll keep on doing it when possible.
There are lots of ways to do fiberglass work. I learned from a friend and from Legnos boat works in Groton, CT. Legnos sells all the supplies including epoxies. Polyester, vinylester, and bondo are all compatible and play well together and add something different to the party.
And I have used epoxies in the past and will still use them when I feel it's better.
 
I have done about 8 or 9 pn our boat. Basically grind down halfway on the inside and halfway on the outside. Do about a 12:1 taper on each side. If 1/4” thick grind out 3” on each side. I put a piece of plastic on the outside flush with the middle and then lay in 1708 glass with epoxy. You will have progressively smaller circles of glass. Lay them in until it is built up flush. Then remove the plastic and do the other side. Most epoxies leave an amine blush that needs to be scrubbed off with water and a brush after they cure before doing any fairing.
I think you meant to say that you would have progressively larger circles as you work your way to the surface. You want each subsequent layer to have contact with the original hull material.
 
Glassing through hulls.

I'm pulling the boat this weekend and was thinking of glassing over a couple old through hulls. I did a search for info but didn't come up with much. Can anyone point me in the right direction to research this? Thanks

I’ve had several done. Do what I do. Hire a professional fiberglass technician with an established business and good reputation. While he’s at it, have him take care of your blisters.
 
Spend some time watching Andy at Boatworks today on Youtube. The guy is like a fiberglass Bobb Ross. No, there is absolutely no reason to use epoxy for filling holes unless the hull is made with epoxy. Is epoxy stronger? Absolutely. Do you need it for a thru hull, not even close. I would not even spend the money on vinyl ester. Use an ISO ester. Biaxial 1708 glass makes it quick. And is easier to bridge the hole. Make sure u get a fin roller to work out bubbles with. Mertons fiberglass in Springfield is a great place to get the stuff. Way cheaper and very fresh
 
I think you meant to say that you would have progressively larger circles as you work your way to the surface. You want each subsequent layer to have contact with the original hull material.

This is a debated topic, so I bet Comodave did mean he puts the largest patch on first (closest to the hull). This is also the way WEST System shows it. Here is one rationale: As you sand or fair, you may sand a bit into the top fiberglass patch layer. If that is your largest piece, you may break the continuity of this, your best most continuous piece.

If the largest piece is up against the hull, it's going to say full thickness and full contact.

This seemed counterintuitive to me many years ago when I first started, so I did it the opposite way at first, with the smallest piece first, then larger as I went outward. Seemed to "match" the shape of my dished out area.

After reading more I changed to the way WEST and Comodave specify. I have not tested either way to failure, but I tend to agree with the aforementioned reasoning so I do it largest first, then work my way to smallest. If my fairing process cuts slightly into the top layer no biggie, as it's not the full sized one.

As far as bond, I have never seen the upper layers fall off, so I don't see that each layer needs to touch the hull (for a small rim area). Probably the layers bond to each other is stronger anyway, as it is a chemical bond. The bond to the hull is a mechanical one.

As I mentioned above, I have seen people do it both ways, so what I'm saying is not gospel. But also I'd say Comodave's way is not wrong.

Here is a page from the WEST Systems manual appendix, on closing out a machined hole (seacock):
 

Attachments

  • WEST seacock.png
    WEST seacock.png
    167.5 KB · Views: 36
Last edited:
I always have followed the West approach as Frosty noted. I like to start with a thin film of thickened epoxy (cabosil or milled fiber) on the dished out area. Next wet out and laminate your successively smaller patches on cardboard or a board. Really brush tap or squeegee out all the excess resin to get a tight laminate. Btw, putting a sharpie mark in the middle of each patch when you cut it will make centering them on each other much easier as 1708 distorts shape easily.

Smack that patch on the thickened epoxy and brush tap to stretch, smooth & squeegee the edges out. Provided there’s no air bubbles or dry spots, the less resin will be stronger and stick better, even upside down.

Depending on the curvature at the patch location, you may have to do a 2nd step, either with fairing compound or CSM to blend. Get that 1st patch bedded down nice & tight, even if it creates a flat spot.
 
Last edited:
Boatworks, Onboard Lifestyle and Sail Life on Youtube all have great videos showing how to glass over through hulls.
Good luck,
Dave
 
This is a debated topic, so I bet Comodave did mean he puts the largest patch on first (closest to the hull). This is also the way WEST System shows it. Here is one rationale: As you sand or fair, you may sand a bit into the top fiberglass patch layer. If that is your largest piece, you may break the continuity of this, your best most continuous piece.

If the largest piece is up against the hull, it's going to say full thickness and full contact.

This seemed counterintuitive to me many years ago when I first started, so I did it the opposite way at first, with the smallest piece first, then larger as I went outward. Seemed to "match" the shape of my dished out area.

After reading more I changed to the way WEST and Comodave specify. I have not tested either way to failure, but I tend to agree with the aforementioned reasoning so I do it largest first, then work my way to smallest. If my fairing process cuts slightly into the top layer no biggie, as it's not the full sized one.

As far as bond, I have never seen the upper layers fall off, so I don't see that each layer needs to touch the hull (for a small rim area). Probably the layers bond to each other is stronger anyway, as it is a chemical bond. The bond to the hull is a mechanical one.

As I mentioned above, I have seen people do it both ways, so what I'm saying is not gospel. But also I'd say Comodave's way is not wrong.

Here is a page from the WEST Systems manual appendix, on closing out a machined hole (seacock):
The rationale I understand is that with the largest patch in contact with the hull and the subsequent patches attached to the large one, a failure of the large patch leads to a loss of bonding for all the patches. You have no redundant adhesion. That makes more sense to me from a mechanical point of view.
 
The rationale I understand is that with the largest patch in contact with the hull and the subsequent patches attached to the large one, a failure of the large patch leads to a loss of bonding for all the patches. You have no redundant adhesion. That makes more sense to me from a mechanical point of view.

I like that logic. :thumb:
 
Do a YouTube search on Fiberglass Through hull. Many examples.
I'm a fan of anything by Boatworks.


Very good advice Boat works guy is very experienced and he does good work
 
Spend some time watching Andy at Boatworks today on Youtube. The guy is like a fiberglass Bobb Ross. No, there is absolutely no reason to use epoxy for filling holes unless the hull is made with epoxy. Is epoxy stronger? Absolutely. Do you need it for a thru hull, not even close. I would not even spend the money on vinyl ester. Use an ISO ester. Biaxial 1708 glass makes it quick. And is easier to bridge the hole. Make sure u get a fin roller to work out bubbles with. Mertons fiberglass in Springfield is a great place to get the stuff. Way cheaper and very fresh
Fiberglass work is very forgiving you can get away with quite a lot my personal preference is epoxy I just like working with it better if nothing else for the smell, anyways Epoxy does Bond well to just about anything although polyester will work well to . I would be very careful taking advice from this website just my Opinion
 
One of the reasons that pro yards use polyester or vinylester is that gel coat will adhere well to it where it won't adhere well over epoxy. When doing a repair on a late model boat, it is best to stick with gel coat finish to match and appear factory. This doesn't mater as much below the waterline on a boat with bottom paint because you aren't trying to match the finish like a topside, deck or house repair. Most gel coat is polyester based and therefore just as prone to absorb water as polyester so there really is no sense in applying gel coat under bottom paint, you may as well go straight to barrier coat or bottom paint.

My personal preference is vinylester, it is right between polyester and epoxy in terms of strength, cost and it is more predictable to work with than polyester. Unfortunately it is hard to come by, quality boat yards use it all the time and sometimes you can buy some off of them.
For something like a through hull epoxy is fine I gelcoat it over small patches many times what’s the worst that can happen you have to redo a small area but I never have . gelcoat will bond fairly well I wouldn’t recommend using polyester over epoxy resin for the main patch however we might be able to get away with that too , watch the boat Works videos advice from this website in my opinion should be taken with a grain of salt
 
Yes, I did mean that I put the largest piece in the hole first. I have never had any patch with epoxy fail. So the likelihood of one coming undone is very small. Also if you do the smallest patch first as you lay each succeeding patch on you will have a ring around the edge of the first patch that the second patch doesn’t make full contact with the hull and you leave a small ring of resin around each patch. I also agree with West Systems on how to do it.
 
Yes and when you go to finish Weather with gel coat or paint make sure you use a brush made from the hairs Of an albino camel only found in the mountains of Pakistan
 
If the repair is structural, largest patch first. It will result in higher peel strength of the patch and higher strength patch (higher glass/resin ratio). With smaller patch first you cannot avoid steps full of resin and no glass at the edge of each layer, and if the scarf is properly tapered you will sand through the last layer or several layers when you fair. For something like patching a thru hull in a thick polyester layup, it won't make a practical difference, but if patching a race boat or an aircraft, that is the way to do it.

On any glass job like this, learn to use peel ply always - it will make a neater job and less work cleaning up.
 
If the repair is structural, largest patch first. It will result in higher peel strength of the patch and higher strength patch (higher glass/resin ratio). With smaller patch first you cannot avoid steps full of resin and no glass at the edge of each layer, and if the scarf is properly tapered you will sand through the last layer or several layers when you fair. For something like patching a thru hull in a thick polyester layup, it won't make a practical difference, but if patching a race boat or an aircraft, that is the way to do it.

On any glass job like this, learn to use peel ply always - it will make a neater job and less work cleaning up.
I personally don’t think it matters however if you’re putting epoxy over polyester I find it very unlikely the patch with the smallest piece first method would be weaker than the poly you’re applying to I’m so confident in this I am willing to wager $500 that the polyester substrate would give way before the epoxy , anyways that’s just my opinion. As far as a peal and ply goes I am not familiar with it other than I know what it is . are you supposed to use it On every layer if so that creates a lot of expense and trash it wouldn’t be for me if it’s just used on the last layer I could possibly see the value of it anyways I’m not an expert in epoxy by any means but my wager stands
 
I cant imagine why anyone would follow west systems approach.. puck?? sand from both sides. Put a few layers of 1708 with non waxed ISO or viny resin. Let it set, new batch, build up opposite side, mix new batch, finish first side, mix up some polyester fairing to cover with to make it cure. Sand, bottom paint, done!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom