velvet drive terrible noise only in gear

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
I replaced my damper plate and it only had 3 bolts holding it. and they were 5/16!
But apparently that's enough cause I ran 14 years and lots of hours like that.
I had the tranny out at the time and was rebuilding it so at that point a new damper plate was a no brainer.
 
Last edited:
change oil and fil with MONO grade SAE30
 
I think we will start on taking this apart next week. I promise to post some pics.
 
You might be able to slide the tranny back enough to replace the damper. Save your back.

Unbolt the shaft. Jack everything up to clear. Block the engine. Put blocks under the 'wings' on the stringers. Shift the lifting point to the front of the tranny. Unbolt the tranny. Keep it level and slide it back.
IIRC you only need about 6 " to get to the damper. Maybe a little more.
 
In my experience, a velvet drive with reduction weighs in at about 80lbs not 150lbs so only one old guy needed LOL
 
In my experience, a velvet drive with reduction weighs in at about 80lbs not 150lbs so only one old guy needed LOL

He probably has the CR2 models. Weight is between 162lbs and 175lbs. You can remove the reduction gear first to lighten it but it is still well beyond the capability of one old guy.
 
Last edited:
In my experience, a velvet drive with reduction weighs in at about 80lbs not 150lbs so only one old guy needed LOL


The book says 154 lbs for my 2.57:1 reduction 72Cs (not CR2s).
 
Hi, got it apart. The damper plate is not cracked, but it seems to be worn out. One of the springs is very loose, it has been shedding rust all over the inside of the bellhousing and it is very dry, not oily. I figure when it spins around, it is snapping and crackling on itself.
Transmission feels very tight and smooth and noiseless when turning by hand. The new plate, I will soak in gear oil, you know it is a moving part within itself under pressure.

It took 3 hours to get it all apart. Reason was, the trans was corroded into the bellhousing. Could not separate it. Finally I decided must unbolt bellhousing with trans. What made that hard was the shield plate on bottom is held on with 9 1/4 inch bolts, and they are hard to get to with trans in the way.
Then when we got the combo off together, I beat the bellhousing off trans with a hammer.

It has the triangular damper plate, so we are ordering the better round plate, and yes, only 3 small bolts hold it on the flywheel.

I was looking at the pics, glad I took some, and was wondering, how to tell which way the damper faces?
Does that Basic Power part I linked seem like the right one to you?

https://photos.app.goo.gl/8vZcx5yw6qxAjXoF8
 

Attachments

  • 20210513_132649.jpg
    20210513_132649.jpg
    195.6 KB · Views: 26
  • 20210513_150044.jpg
    20210513_150044.jpg
    155.5 KB · Views: 22
  • 20210513_150109.jpg
    20210513_150109.jpg
    193.4 KB · Views: 24
Using a straight edge determine the depth of the mounted plate on the flywheel. Use that to determine which side of the dp goes where. Mine had one side of the spline about an inch proud of the other.

As a note, from the factory, mine had the wrong or backwards dp on the shaft. Was only engaging by 1/2" on tranny shaft and the hub was worn almost out. I figure maybe 50 hours or one hard shift and toast.

I would be tempted to change the plate and test the tranny if it came out easy. Tough call.
 
That's the plate I now have. Not sure lubing it will do much. Will just throw it off.
 
I see, makes sense to face it so the trans hub gets as much insertion into the DP as possible.

Curious as to what standard versus heavy duty really means here.
Thicker steel? Stronger springs? Does it really last longer? His boat wont see much use.
 
Plan tomorrow to put it back together, likely over the next 2 days.
He got the 107 plate, it is an upgrade from the triangular 6 spring plate Mercruiser used.
 
It is all together and will start and test today.
However,.... I did find out when putting trans back in, the output flange has some noticeable play. I did not notice that when taking it out.
I would estimate play of about 10 thousands .010 inch.

Seeing this is the newer style reduction drive and uses a spacer, anyone think the spacer is collapsed? Or is something worn down.

I have the 1 11/16" socket for the flange nut. I was reading in the trans manual, they mention bearing preload rolling torque of 15 - 30 inch pounds, and I see some spacers are solid (preferable) some meant to collapse? Some forum posts mention around 200 ft lbs on the flange nut.

So is that enough play to cause this noise? There is no leaking oil from the trans rear.

I also pondered trying to tighten the flange nut. Can the nut be at 200 ft lbs tight, and the end shaft still have too much play?
 
Last edited:
Also wanted to say, the damper plate bolts are shouldered, which means they align the damper plate concentrically with the flywheel, just any old bolt should not be used. And I could have used 6 bolts, but the old triangular plate had only 3, 3/8 grade 5 bolts. The flywheel has 6 machined shouldered bolt holes that can be used. The trans slid on in easily, was easier than when I did this on my engines.

My engine uses a small circular plate and 9 grade 8 1/4 inch non shouldered bolts to hold it on. which may mean the plate can move a little sideways. Might make it harder to bring together.

https://bpi.ebasicpower.com/shop/ma...lex-plate-7.125-diameter-as7-k1c-070-008-1918
 
Last edited:
Are you really sure this is a reduction drive? I just looked at the video again and this looks like a 1:1 Velvet Drive, I don't see a reduction housing on it. For comparison, here's a photo of a reduction Velvet Drive:
Velvet-Drive-Transmission-10-18-000-005.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20210513_132649.jpg
    20210513_132649.jpg
    195.6 KB · Views: 14
Gotcha. Definitely a reduction unit then. The good news is, if there ends up being an issue in the reduction unit, you can slide the shaft back and pull the reduction housing off the trans without taking it back out of the boat.

I was think something like that too.
 
I rebuilt one of mine, the older original reduction unit style has the double uni bearing and bolt on rear collar.
This kind has a spacer separating 2 roller bearings.
I probably could do this work myself, if I got motivated to help him some more. I dont think there should be so much looseness in the rear flange I have read about .005 is ok.
But if noise is gone, wont plan on doing any more to it.
Still want to know how 200 ft lbs of torque on the nut relates to this spacer and maintaining proper pre-load on the 2 cone roller bearings. sometimes I have to take things apart to understand how they work. I would think the spacer is pressing on the inner bearing races of both bearings. And the nut pressure is forcing the outer cone bearings together like a sandwich with the output shaft and bushing assembly to the outer prop shaft connector flange.

So somehow, 200 ft lbs of nut torque translates to 15 -30 inch pounds of rolling shaft torque pre load?
 
Last edited:
That's the plate I now have. Not sure lubing it will do much. Will just throw it off.
It never throws off all the lube you put into it due to surface tension of the thick oil.
His old plate showed wear and trails of rust. That inner hub has fingers that interact with the springs and it has faces that slide against the steel stamped parts, it is under a constant moving pulsing force generated as the pistons fire.

I am thinking if it is too loose, then the spacer is too long and it can be ground shorter. That will bring the cone roller bearings closer together and tighten the clearances. So it might not be too hard to fix it better as in no need to buy new spacers.
Those roller bearings are supposed to have a preload, meaning they run tight enough that there is no play. So 10 thousands of looseness, means grind 10 thousands off the spacer at least. It is a trial and fit method to get it correct.

I wonder if a too loose rear bearing like that will cause that kind of noise?
 
Last edited:
My crude drawing of the spacer cylinder relationship to the shaft, flange, housing. So you can see shrinking the spacer, tightens the cone bearings.
 

Attachments

  • 20210519_123208.jpg
    20210519_123208.jpg
    107.4 KB · Views: 14
Totally silent, fixed, no more awful noise.
So a little play in the output bearing does not mean any noise.
The damper plate was really worn out.

Only thing extra I might have liked was 3 more damper plate bolts.

Just got back from the marina to post a success story.
 
Totally silent, fixed, no more awful noise.
So a little play in the output bearing does not mean any noise.
The damper plate was really worn out.

Only thing extra I might have liked was 3 more damper plate bolts.

Just got back from the marina to post a success story.

Fantastic!!!
 
Did you try to snug the output flange big nut? 0.010" of play in that pair of tapered roller bearings would concern me.
 
Did you try to snug the output flange big nut? 0.010" of play in that pair of tapered roller bearings would concern me.

No did not, thought about it next day but it was already together.
I could not feel the slight looseness when it was full of oil, only after it drained for a week. I asked him if he wanted to look into it, but for now he did not.
The flange is not rocking loose on the shaft. And there is no leak. If the nut was that loose, oil would leek out the end. The large nylock nut seals oil from seeping past the shaft and flange. it is one reason they want you to use a new nut on a repair, but you can use Permatex RTV
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom