Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-07-2017, 12:46 PM   #101
Senior Member
 
Aquafarm's Avatar
 
City: Port, Macedon NY
Vessel Name: Patience
Vessel Model: Maple Bay 27'
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durant F View Post
Speaking of camanos being a great couples boat (providing they have 2 anchors)(of exceptable weight and design as well) has anyone seen a Maple Bay 27? I was lucky enough to be aboard one for a tour a few years ago. What a pretty, classic looking and extremely livable smaller boat. Only a few were built and long out of production now. No flybridge tho.. I’ve truly gotten to enjoy the flybridge on sunny days.
We are here, on the east-ish coast Been slipped at Dunkirk NY the past two seasons, but next year will have our home base at Macedon NY on the Erie Canal...and you are right 27 feet is perfect, never thought it would be as comfortable and livable as it is...we love her.
Aquafarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 02:20 PM   #102
Veteran Member
 
City: Redington Shores
Vessel Name: Andiamo
Vessel Model: Mainship 34 Trawler
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 35
We put an offer in on a 2006 MS 34. We looked at the Camano 31.
Our reasons for not pursuing one was the difficulty in getting around on the boat for those of us that are starting to have mobility issues and can't climb ladders or hang on and hope not to slip on a 6" side deck.
As far as the less is more argument goes, there are a minimum number of systems required on most small trawlers. I doubt my larger/heavier MS 34 has any more systems then a Camano 31 setup for cruising, albeit it will cost more to dock and run.

My two cents!
David
daviddraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 02:27 PM   #103
Guru
 
OldDan1943's Avatar
 
City: Aventura FL
Vessel Name: Kinja
Vessel Model: American Tug 34 #116 2008
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 10,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by daviddraper View Post
We put an offer in on a 2006 MS 34. We looked at the Camano 31.
Our reasons for not pursuing one was the difficulty in getting around on the boat for those of us that are starting to have mobility issues and can't climb ladders or hang on and hope not to slip on a 6" side deck.
As far as the less is more argument goes, there are a minimum number of systems required on most small trawlers. I doubt my larger/heavier MS 34 has any more systems then a Camano 31 setup for cruising, albeit it will cost more to dock and run.

My two cents!
David
For my AT, I hung a few grab lines from the upper railings and hang on tight if I go down the side decks. Of course, the AT has a port and starboard pilot house doors to transit aft or forward as necessary.
The side decks on the AT34, the side decks are a bit over 9 inches.
I have briefly thought about having some railings fabricated running from after of the pilot house doors aft to the cockpit. I think I would actually lose part of the side deck so I settled for the hanging lines.
__________________
The meek will inherit the earth but, the brave will inherit the seas.
OldDan1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Trawler Port Captains
Port Captains are TF volunteers who can serve as local guides or assist with local arrangements and information. Search below to locate Port Captains near your destination. To learn more about this program read here: TF Port Captain Program





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012