View Poll Results: What are your experiences re Doc No Location?
|
Doc No is in salon, or other topside living space – never a problem
|
|
7 |
12.07% |
Doc No is below deck in eng rm etc – VSC Passed w/o issue re Doc No Loc’n
|
|
31 |
53.45% |
Doc No is below deck in eng rm etc – VSC Failed due to Doc No Loc’n
|
|
0 |
0% |
Doc No is below deck in eng rm etc – Been boarded w/o issue re Doc No loc’n
|
|
21 |
36.21% |
Doc No is below deck in eng rm etc – Been boarded and advised to relocate Doc No
|
|
0 |
0% |
Doc No is below deck in eng rm etc – Been boarded, issued citation for improper Doc No Loc’n
|
|
0 |
0% |
Other - Please explain via post
|
|
4 |
6.90% |
|
|
01-05-2019, 08:52 PM
|
#1
|
TF Site Team
City: Seneca Lake NY
Vessel Name: Bacchus
Vessel Model: MS 34 HT Trawler
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,828
|
Documentation No Location Question & Poll
This post is in regard to documented boats only – if not documented no need to read any further
I’m a USPS Vessel Examiner (VE) (Courtesy Vessel Safety Checks) and have been challenged online by a USCG Aux VE from another area concerning interpretation of one portion of the Fed Regulations regarding proper display of Official (Documentation) Number.
I've obtained opinions from USCG HQ and happy to post in a later post - didn't want to sway the responses at the start.
I feel comfortable with my understanding but wonder what others have experienced as it is obvious the interpretation is not consistent for all areas & agencies.
For those with documented boats I’m curious what your practice is and would like to know about any experiences with VSCs or boardings.
The applicable regs below – the issue being debated is the highlighted section and revolves around “proper” interpretation of “clearly visible”
46 CFR § 67.121 - Official number marking requirement.
“The official number of the vessel, preceded by the abbreviation “NO.” must be marked in block-type Arabic numerals not less than three inches in height on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull. The number must be permanently affixed to the vessel so that alteration, removal, or replacement would be obvious. If the official number is on a separate plate, the plate must be fastened in such a manner that its removal would normally cause some scarring of or damage to the surrounding hull area.”
USCG Aux – interprets the reg to mean the Doc No must be visible when any LEO or VE boards the boat – in a topside living space, salon, helm etc. and can not be located in engine room or other below deck space or behind a hatch caver.
My interpretation is that engine room, lazarette, etc is acceptable as long as it is visible without moving equipment, bulkheads, etc
I’ll incorporate a poll to track responses and would appreciate hearing about any boarding or Vessel Safety Check situations that resulted in warnings, citations etc for “improper” display of Doc No (not name, home port or state registration no display)
Thanks
__________________
Don
2008 MS 34 HT Trawler
"Bacchus"
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 09:27 PM
|
#2
|
Guru
City: Z
Vessel Model: tbd
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,027
|
I dont even think this is debatable. USCG Aux is incorrect.
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 09:30 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
City: St James City/Punta Gorda
Vessel Name: Charlie Noble
Vessel Model: 32 Nordic Tug
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 424
|
On the Nordic Tug we just purchased the Doc # is located in the lazarette. This is our first experience with a documented boat. The surveyor listed it in the report as not being in a visible area. But since it has been Documented since 1986 we are not going to change its location unless we are told to by someone with authority.
__________________
The best way to find out is get her out on the ocean, because if anything is going to happen it's going to happen out there.
"Captain Ron"
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 09:40 PM
|
#4
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystery
I dont even think this is debatable. USCG Aux is incorrect.
|
I agree they are incorrect.
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 10:12 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
City: Bellingham, WA
Vessel Name: Excellent Adventure
Vessel Model: 1995 Jefferson Ker Shine 45
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 395
|
That is why boats have the HIN molded into the transom. Visible to anyone.
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 10:47 PM
|
#6
|
Veteran Member
City: East Central Florida
Vessel Name: Joy Shared
Vessel Model: Gulfstar 44 Motor Cruiser
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystery
I dont even think this is debatable. USCG Aux is incorrect.
|
Exactly, CGAUX can't add exclusions (can't be in the engine room) to the code.
This seems like a spat between hobbyist organizations
|
|
|
01-05-2019, 11:28 PM
|
#7
|
Master and Commander
City: Vallejo CA
Vessel Name: Carquinez Coot
Vessel Model: penultimate Seahorse Marine Coot hull #6
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,559
|
Believe the aux is wrong. Nevertheless, my documentation number is prominently displaced in the pilothouse.
__________________
Kar-KEEN-ez Koot
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:32 AM
|
#8
|
Moderator Emeritus
City: Au Gres, MI
Vessel Name: Black Dog
Vessel Model: Formula 41PC
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 21,191
|
Wait a minute. I am a CG Aux Vessel Examiner and I absolutely know what and how the requirements are for displaying documentation numbers are. Please don’t say the Auxiliary is wrong, ONE VE is wrong. Don’t smear all Aux VEs because one doesn’t know the requirements. Several members here have already stated that the Aux is wrong. That is wrong.
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 06:27 AM
|
#9
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,151
|
This is one of the reasons I say be very careful and dont take USCGAUX inspections and courses too seriously. I have met way too many that overshadow their knowledge with opinions that mislead.
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 06:37 AM
|
#10
|
Guru
City: Fort Myers, FL... Summers in the Great Lakes
Vessel Name: Slow Hand
Vessel Model: Cherubini Independence 45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,834
|
I have 2 documented vessels. Both have documentation numbers on a facing bulkhead in the engine room. This used to be the standard, numbers cut into, welded on, or engraved / welded to a piece of material and attached to a bulkhead. The purpose was to have them not easily removable. I haven't kept up with the rule as I haven't been tested on it for licensing (USCG captain's license) since the mid 1980s. Wonder if this is a grandfathered rule or not.
Ted
__________________
Blog: mvslowhand.com
I'm tired of fast moves, I've got a slow groove, on my mind.....
I want to spend some time, Not come and go in a heated rush.....
"Slow Hand" by The Pointer Sisters
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 06:54 AM
|
#11
|
Guru
City: Vermont
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,093
|
Ours have always been in the ER on a plaque, sized etc per USCG specs. But I have never been boarded or inspected, so can't say whether it would meet other's requirements.
__________________
MVTanglewood.com
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 06:58 AM
|
#12
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,151
|
As posted above in post #1...this is straight from the NVDC.
HOW DO I MARK MY VESSEL?
The official number assigned to documented vessels, preceded by the abbreviation "NO." must be marked in block-type Arabic numerals at least*three inches*high on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull. The number must be permanently affixed so that alteration, removal, or replacement would be obvious and cause some scarring or damage to the surrounding hull area.
Ted, no need to grandfater anything. Your vessels are correctly marked and that one or any USCGAUX examiner who thinks differently needs to show in USCG regs (NOT USCGAUX) or the CFRs where it is even ALLOWED to be in the pilothouse.
I do think I read that some USCG memo or guidance letter said for rec boats, the screw on carved placards are OK..... but in reality, thats NOT the way it was intended (not permanent enough as in theft).
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 07:43 AM
|
#13
|
Guru
City: Vermont
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,093
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacchus
This post is in regard to documented boats only – if not documented no need to read any further
I’m a USPS Vessel Examiner (VE) (Courtesy Vessel Safety Checks) and have been challenged online by a USCG Aux VE from another area concerning interpretation of one portion of the Fed Regulations regarding proper display of Official (Documentation) Number.
I've obtained opinions from USCG HQ and happy to post in a later post - didn't want to sway the responses at the start.
I feel comfortable with my understanding but wonder what others have experienced as it is obvious the interpretation is not consistent for all areas & agencies.
For those with documented boats I’m curious what your practice is and would like to know about any experiences with VSCs or boardings.
The applicable regs below – the issue being debated is the highlighted section and revolves around “proper” interpretation of “clearly visible”
46 CFR § 67.121 - Official number marking requirement.
“The official number of the vessel, preceded by the abbreviation “NO.” must be marked in block-type Arabic numerals not less than three inches in height on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull. The number must be permanently affixed to the vessel so that alteration, removal, or replacement would be obvious. If the official number is on a separate plate, the plate must be fastened in such a manner that its removal would normally cause some scarring of or damage to the surrounding hull area.”
USCG Aux – interprets the reg to mean the Doc No must be visible when any LEO or VE boards the boat – in a topside living space, salon, helm etc. and can not be located in engine room or other below deck space or behind a hatch caver.
My interpretation is that engine room, lazarette, etc is acceptable as long as it is visible without moving equipment, bulkheads, etc
I’ll incorporate a poll to track responses and would appreciate hearing about any boarding or Vessel Safety Check situations that resulted in warnings, citations etc for “improper” display of Doc No (not name, home port or state registration no display)
Thanks
|
ER is absolutely acceptable, and the most common location I have seen.
__________________
MVTanglewood.com
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 11:50 AM
|
#14
|
Guru
City: East Coast
Vessel Name: M/V Maerin (Sold)
Vessel Model: Solo 4303
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedtree
ER is absolutely acceptable, and the most common location I have seen.
|
I concur; as a former examiner with the Power Squadron, I don't recall there ever being any requirement similar to the Auxiliary's opinion that the PO noted. It's an interpretation, at best, and one that's pretty much pointless. There are more important issues to address in a VSE than splitting hairs over the minutiae of where the doc # is displayed. Focusing on such irrelevant detail serves only to inflate the inspector's self-importance and dilutes the overall purpose of the program. If the number's displayed, visible, can't be altered, and is the correct size, it meets the requirement. Next checklist item?
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 11:56 AM
|
#15
|
TF Site Team
City: Seneca Lake NY
Vessel Name: Bacchus
Vessel Model: MS 34 HT Trawler
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,828
|
Thanks - Keep the responses coming
Thanks folks - appreciate the replies & info
Have to admit I'm pleasantly surprised with replies so far.
I thought there would be more variation in interpretation as this USCGAux VE is absolutely adamant about this and claims this interpretation is what is practiced across a large USCGA region in the NE.
My home port is on an inland lake and admit we have many more registered than documented vessels. I suspect it is just the opposite with this group and why I inquired here for a bigger picture.
wwestman - Post #5
- Agree but HIN is a whole different area of regs but is interesting as the requirement is for Two identical HIN's - the "visible" one we are all familiar with on Outside of hull @ Stbd Stern and ""duplicate hull identification number must be affixed in an unexposed location on the interior of the boat or beneath a fitting or item of hardware.
I interpret the "clearly visible" wording in the Doc No section is to differentiate it from the duplicate HIN which is " hidden" rather than restrict the location to a normally occupied living space - but admit that is just my opinion,
markpierce - Post #7
Absolutely agree that pilothouse, salon (or saloon for some) are OK
I believe, (haven't found) that USCG definition of "Hull" includes top side structure above rubrail as long as it is truly part of the structure.
Comodave - Post #8
- I absolutely agree with your point about individuals vs organizations
- I don't mean to attack or slam the individual either. He is doing his best and providing a service intended to promote safe boating and I applaud him for doing it and actually doing more if it than I do.
- My mission is to make sure my interpretation is correct to the best of my ability so I can 1) better inform the public when doing VSC's and 2) Better inform the VE's that I have trained and look to me for direction.
OC Diver - Post #10
Ted I absolutely agree with being OK to cut into, weld on, attach to structural members below - stringers, bulkheads etc as long as they are structural and not removable - no grand fathering required... Further reinforced by this response I received...
Clarification provided by Program Management & Operations Branch (CG-BSX-21) U. S. Coast Guard Boating Safety Division
Responded in writing that “on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull” replaced the old “main beam” language as no vessel that is made of anything other than wood has a main beam.
I intyerpret Main Beam to be hull structure below deck.
psneeld - Post #12
I am not aware of and don't believe there are and exceptions or different standards applied to recreation vs commercial vessels - in regard to Doc No or HIN at least. There are other regs that do apply to various classes of vessels that do not include recreational vessels. To the best of my knowledge the ones we are discussing here apply universally. Whether enforcement folks have been instructed to "cut recreational boaters a break" by not issuing citations or taking other enforcement action may be another story.
I have had many discussion w/ LEO regarding marine patrols and without exception they have stated (and acted) that they are not out to write citations and force boater off the water - UNLESS the violation is a hazard of significant safety issue. Even in the case of inadequate PFD's our local LEO will frequently issue oloaner PFD's and instruct them to drop off at our marina when done or come see us for a loaner as we have a free loaner program.
I will summarize and post the the responses I have been able to obtain from USCG HQ and NVDC when I get a little time.
Thanks - keep the anecdotes coming and I'm especially interested in those that involve boarding or vessel safety checks
__________________
Don
2008 MS 34 HT Trawler
"Bacchus"
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:07 PM
|
#16
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,151
|
"His claims" and "adamant" has always been my problem with the USCGAUX.
Its a shame a few "wannabes" that "can't" overshadow a lot of hardworking, knowledgeable USCGAUX members.
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:20 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
City: Rapid City, SD heading back to the PNW
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 212
|
46 CFR § 67.121 - Official number marking requirement.
“The official number of the vessel, preceded by the abbreviation “NO.” must be marked in block-type Arabic numerals not less than three inches in height on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull. The number must be permanently affixed to the vessel so that alteration, removal, or replacement would be obvious. If the official number is on a separate plate, the plate must be fastened in such a manner that its removal would normally cause some scarring of or damage to the surrounding hull area.”
The rule clearly states that the Doc No. must be on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull.
This does not mean the cabin or superstructure above the hull.
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:28 PM
|
#18
|
TF Site Team
City: Seneca Lake NY
Vessel Name: Bacchus
Vessel Model: MS 34 HT Trawler
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by psneeld
"His claims" and "adamant" has always been my problem with the USCGAUX.
Its a shame a few "wannabes" that "can't" overshadow a lot of hardworking, knowledgeable USCGAUX members.
|
Agree
When I provided what I consider high level "official" responses his only come back was restating how many VSC's & how many yrs he's been doing this... louder and louder. But he will not / can not provide any training Doc, response from the chain of command etc to substantiate it.
What is really sad is his Doc No proudly displayed in his cabin is put on with stick on numbers and NOT glassed over... and he claims a scraper used to remove them would leave a mark... DUH - heat gun & acetone
__________________
Don
2008 MS 34 HT Trawler
"Bacchus"
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:34 PM
|
#19
|
TF Site Team
City: Seneca Lake NY
Vessel Name: Bacchus
Vessel Model: MS 34 HT Trawler
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mramoo
46 CFR § 67.121 - Official number marking requirement.
The rule clearly states that the Doc No. must be on some clearly visible interior structural part of the hull.
This does not mean the cabin or superstructure above the hull.
|
See note above re: Post # 7 - I am not questioning cabin or super structure and absolutely believe that is acceptable.
I believe many commercial vessels in fact display their Doc No in pilothouse, etc
I haven't been able to find the USCG definitions that support this but believe their definition of "Hull" is more broadly defined as "below a rubrail"
__________________
Don
2008 MS 34 HT Trawler
"Bacchus"
|
|
|
01-06-2019, 12:40 PM
|
#20
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,151
|
Just the word DUH with him is adequate.
When a Sr. Officer somewhat in charge of regional USCGAUX filoatillas, I used to cringe at reports of guys like this and would start the process to remove their qualifications.
But it was a painfully slow process as being volunteers they were considered "helpful" despite any problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|