Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-18-2016, 10:55 AM   #1
Guru
 
JDCAVE's Avatar
 
City: North Vancouver
Vessel Name: Phoenix Hunter
Vessel Model: Kadey Krogen 42 (1985)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,877
Under loading.

I liked this article, although I'm sure others may debate the specifics.

The Perils of Chronic Under-Loading | Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting

Jim


Jim
Sent from my iPad using Trawler Forum
JDCAVE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 11:17 AM   #2
Guru
 
O C Diver's Avatar
 
City: Fort Myers, FL... Summers in the Great Lakes
Vessel Name: Slow Hand
Vessel Model: Cherubini Independence 45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,834
Overall a good article. Think most diesels can live happy long lives around 50% of rated power though.

Ted
__________________
Blog: mvslowhand.com
I'm tired of fast moves, I've got a slow groove, on my mind.....
I want to spend some time, Not come and go in a heated rush.....
"Slow Hand" by The Pointer Sisters
O C Diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 02:17 PM   #3
FF
Guru
 
FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
Many diesel marinizations do well in boats as they carry an auto style rating , which is nonsense for a vessel use.

3 cubic inches per HP will keep most folks in the ball park.
FF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 04:16 PM   #4
Valued Technical Contributor
 
DavidM's Avatar
 
City: Litchfield, Ct
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,786
I am not sure from reading Steve's article at what point "chronic under loading" occurs. He says 75% load is optimum, but the pictures of a Man engine's instruments show 28% load and he says that the coolant and oil temperatures at that load are "ideal".


So, is it 75% or is it 28% or is it ??? Mr. D'Antonio?


Frankly, I believe a lot depends on the engine. A 6 liter Lehman 120 should be able to run just fine all day long making 25% load or 30 hp. Thousands and thousands cf cruisers have run them that way with no harm done. OTOH my 5.3 liter Yanmar 370 will probably run too cool at that hp loading. Why? It has a cooling system that is designed for three times the power of the Lehman and it has unregulated sea water cooled oil. Both take more than 30 hp for the oil and water to get up to operating temperature.


On the combustion side, the Lehman's injectors are sized for 120 hp and mine are sized for 370. When those injectors on my engine are only operating at 1/12 load they can't have as nice a spray pattern as injectors operating at 1/4 load.


All of which means I run my Yanmar to produce 60 hp minimum or about 16% of max. I do try to run it up to 75% load for fifteen minutes every dozen hours or so to blow out the carbon build up. So far it has worked for me.


David
DavidM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 04:29 PM   #5
Technical Guru
 
Ski in NC's Avatar
 
City: Wilmington, NC
Vessel Name: Louisa
Vessel Model: Custom Built 38
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,194
I don't think running at super low load is optimum, but in twenty years in the engine business I have only run into two examples of glazed cylinders. Both on generators. Never seen it on propulsion engines, and lots just putt along at very low load. Including mine.
Ski in NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 05:42 PM   #6
Guru
 
Capt.Bill11's Avatar
 
City: Sarasota/Ft. Lauderdale
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski in NC View Post
I don't think running at super low load is optimum, but in twenty years in the engine business I have only run into two examples of glazed cylinders. Both on generators. Never seen it on propulsion engines, and lots just putt along at very low load. Including mine.
Capt.Bill11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 07:14 PM   #7
Guru
 
JDCAVE's Avatar
 
City: North Vancouver
Vessel Name: Phoenix Hunter
Vessel Model: Kadey Krogen 42 (1985)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,877
Under loading.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski in NC View Post
I don't think running at super low load is optimum, but in twenty years in the engine business I have only run into two examples of glazed cylinders. Both on generators. Never seen it on propulsion engines, and lots just putt along at very low load. Including mine.

Thanks Ski. Your experience in this matter gives me piece of mind. Once at operating temperatures, I normally set my Lehman 135 at 1800 and leave it there for the most part, and that gives me 7.5 kts. I rarely go above 2,000. WOT is 2650, I beleive, and according to one of the engine surveys I have, this indicates the boat is properly propped.


Jim
Sent from my iPad using Trawler Forum
JDCAVE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 09:57 PM   #8
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48 (sold)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski in NC View Post
I don't think running at super low load is optimum, but in twenty years in the engine business I have only run into two examples of glazed cylinders. Both on generators. Never seen it on propulsion engines, and lots just putt along at very low load. Including mine.

Ski

My sense is that too many people get paid to write articles that are of interest and appeal to the general boating public. That does not mean the articles are factual for all engines. My friends in the same business as you find under loading a "modern" propulsion engine is overhyped. Does your experience find the DD 2 strokes suffer any under loading issues?
sunchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 08:23 AM   #9
Guru
 
TDunn's Avatar
 
City: Maine Coast
Vessel Name: Tortuga
Vessel Model: Nunes Brothers Raised Deck Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 889
A comment about loading. I have always looked at %load at a given rpm as being relative to the maximum horsepower that the engine can produce at that rpm. For example at my normal cruising rpms of 2000, my 3200 rpm rated diesel is loaded at approximately 30% (based on comparing the calculated propeller curve with the engine output curve. At 2400 rpms (75% of rated engine rpms), my engine is only loaded to about 42% NOT 75%. I only get to 75% load if I run up at 2900 rpms.

Basically engine load % should to be looked at in terms of the propeller curve (with add ons for alternators, etc.) compared to the engine maximum output curve. Calculating load percent that way, few boats ever run at 75% load and then only briefly.

Now another consideration. My wife HATES the noise level when I run above 2500 rpms. Frankly I would rather buy a new engine a few years early than listen to her complaining.
TDunn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 08:43 AM   #10
Guru
 
O C Diver's Avatar
 
City: Fort Myers, FL... Summers in the Great Lakes
Vessel Name: Slow Hand
Vessel Model: Cherubini Independence 45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDunn View Post
A comment about loading. I have always looked at %load at a given rpm as being relative to the maximum horsepower that the engine can produce at that rpm. For example at my normal cruising rpms of 2000, my 3200 rpm rated diesel is loaded at approximately 30% (based on comparing the calculated propeller curve with the engine output curve. At 2400 rpms (75% of rated engine rpms), my engine is only loaded to about 42% NOT 75%. I only get to 75% load if I run up at 2900 rpms.

Basically engine load % should to be looked at in terms of the propeller curve (with add ons for alternators, etc.) compared to the engine maximum output curve. Calculating load percent that way, few boats ever run at 75% load and then only briefly.
Funny you mention that. My John Deere has a load gauge on the panel. The computer determines load percentage based on RPM and fuel consumption. The gauge displays the percentage of load for that RPM not the engine at maximum output. JD is more concerned with the percentage at the cruising RPM. There are warning alarms for too low and too high a percentage based on time. As an example, if I were to run over 80% for 30 minutes or at 100% for 10 minutes, the alarms start going off. 40 to 70% for a given RPM seems to be the design operating range.

Ted
__________________
Blog: mvslowhand.com
I'm tired of fast moves, I've got a slow groove, on my mind.....
I want to spend some time, Not come and go in a heated rush.....
"Slow Hand" by The Pointer Sisters
O C Diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 08:52 AM   #11
Guru
 
RCook's Avatar


 
City: Holladay, UT
Vessel Name: Dream Catcher
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 37-065
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmarchand View Post

Frankly, I believe a lot depends on the engine. A 6 liter Lehman 120 should be able to run just fine all day long making 25% load or 30 hp. Thousands and thousands cf cruisers have run them that way with no harm done. OTOH my 5.3 liter Yanmar 370 will probably run too cool at that hp loading. Why? It has a cooling system that is designed for three times the power of the Lehman and it has unregulated sea water cooled oil. Both take more than 30 hp for the oil and water to get up to operating temperature.


On the combustion side, the Lehman's injectors are sized for 120 hp and mine are sized for 370. When those injectors on my engine are only operating at 1/12 load they can't have as nice a spray pattern as injectors operating at 1/4 load.


All of which means I run my Yanmar to produce 60 hp minimum or about 16% of max. I do try to run it up to 75% load for fifteen minutes every dozen hours or so to blow out the carbon build up. So far it has worked for me.
Very similar to the strongly-emphasized advice I got in my first year of cruising with our 260hp Volvo KAD44P. Long term idling was to be avoided, as the cooling system would over-do it. But cruising a bit above hull speed, such that the coolant temp was 175-180 degrees, should keep the oil sufficiently warm, and evenly enough too. Occasional runs up to normal planing cruising speeds recommended.

Seems to have worked - more than 4,000 hours doing mostly slow cruising so far.

Maybe just for fun I'll check the oil pan temp.
__________________
Richard Cook
Dream Catcher (Nordic Tug 37-065) Poulsbo WA
Previously: New Moon (Bounty 257), Cindy Sea (C-Dory 22 Cruiser)
"Cruising in a Big Way"
RCook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:26 AM   #12
Guru
 
Steve DAntonio's Avatar


 
City: Deltaville
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,069
DJMarchand, good catch. This MAN has an oil thermostat, so its oil temp is regulated unlike most others. When that photo was taken, during as passage I made from Scotland to Iceland, aboard a Fleming 65, the vessel was laboring in a heavy sea so the the helmsman was constantly varying load as she climbed up waves and then surfed down them. I'm certain the average load was somewhere near 50% during that part of the run.

I've taken apart and repaired many diesel engiens (and genset engines) and while it's anecdotal, and no one rule fits all of them, those that are chronically under loaded clearly have the greatest level of carbon build up on rings and valves, and in turbos. Oil analyses also bears out this theory, I see scores of these reports every year and chronic under-loading nearly always results in higher fuel dilution and additive depletion. Those findings, as well as boat builder's penchant to over-power vessels, are what inspired this and several other articles I've written on the subject.

The good news is it's pretty easy to mitigate with periodic run ups. When I suggest clients do this on more than a few occasions they report back after having done so to say, "I ran up to 75% and after a few minutes the engine began to overheat, so is this a problem for the engine?" The answer is yes, but the problem is not with the engine, it's with the cooling system, a clogged heat exchanger or injection elbow, damaged impeller or worn pump cam, the run up simply exposed it.
__________________
Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting, Inc.
https://www.stevedmarineconsulting.com
Steve DAntonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:30 AM   #13
Guru
 
City: kemah
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDunn View Post
Now another consideration. My wife HATES the noise level when I run above 2500 rpms. Frankly I would rather buy a new engine a few years early than listen to her complaining.
At least when the engine gets around to wailing you know there's actually a problem.

Had a mailman lock up his car one time because he idles it everywhere for work. The head had built up so much carbon that the piston couldnt reach full height.
what_barnacles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:38 AM   #14
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48 (sold)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCook View Post
Maybe just for fun I'll check the oil pan temp.
This is what I do with an IR gun during routine ER checks when cruising. My engine loading as estimated by fuel burn has to drop below 15% before oil temps fall below 175F.
sunchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:49 AM   #15
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48 (sold)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve DAntonio View Post
. When I suggest clients do this on more than a few occasions they report back after having done so to say, "I ran up to 75% and after a few minutes the engine began to overheat, so is this a problem for the engine?" The answer is yes, but the problem is not with the engine, it's with the cooling system, a clogged heat exchanger or injection elbow, damaged impeller or worn pump cam, the run up simply exposed it.
Add to the causes for high temperatures - the boat is over propped. Sometimes straight out of the factory as I have encountered during a few sea trials.

IMHO this is why propping to allow rated RPM is important, then a high temperature can be chased along the lines of your suggestions.
sunchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:57 AM   #16
Guru
 
Nomad Willy's Avatar
 
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,743
sunchaser wrote;
"My fuel burn has to drop below 15% before oil temps fall below 175F.

Now that is significant information. Never woulda thunk.

But what you're saying sounds like something a gas engine would do.

Someone alluded to coolant heating the lube oil a few posts back and that's the only possible explanation for the oil temp being that high w only a 15% load on. What do you suppose is the path of all that heat from the coolant to the oil? Is there an lube oil cooler running off the cooling system keeping the lube oil temp artificially high just like the coolant? Then to be a cooler at some point the heat transfer will need to reverse. Something in my thinking must be bass akwards.
__________________
Eric

North Western Washington State USA
Nomad Willy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 10:28 AM   #17
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48 (sold)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by manyboats View Post
Is there an lube oil cooler running off the cooling system keeping the lube oil temp artificially high just like the coolant?
Yes, a plate heat exchanger. This is not uncommon on many engines., as also mentioned by others. Many diesels operate under sporadic light loads and are designed accordingly, think generators. If the basis of one's marine engine is a genset or stationary unit, you likely have a good one.

Too bad RickB isn't on board for this discussion. He not only knows this stuff inside out but has designed and invented systems to deal with load shedding and exhaust "clean up."
sunchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 10:53 AM   #18
Valued Technical Contributor
 
DavidM's Avatar
 
City: Litchfield, Ct
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,786
Steve:


Thanks for your explanation. I think all of us could use an objective set of criteria for determining when we are under loaded, or maybe more useful- criteria that would indicate than an engine is properly loaded. So let me propose some, taken from your article and your posting above:


1. Coolant temperature at 160 F or above.
2. Oil temperature at 180 F or above.
3. Exhaust turbo only has a light dry soot coating (we can't easily see injector tips or ring carbon, but turbo soot should be a decent indicator).
4. Oil analysis shows less than 0.5% fuel content.


I believe that these criteria will tell you if you are loaded decently. On my Yanmar 370, I meet all of these criteria with the possible exception of oil temperature while running at about 1,600 rpm and producing roughly 60 hp with occasional high power runs to blow out the accumulated soot.


David
DavidM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 11:17 AM   #19
Guru
 
JDCAVE's Avatar
 
City: North Vancouver
Vessel Name: Phoenix Hunter
Vessel Model: Kadey Krogen 42 (1985)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,877
Thanks Steve. Bob Smith said we should be taking the our engines up to WOT occasionally, as if it can't get there something is wrong.



Jim
Sent from my iPad using Trawler Forum
JDCAVE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 02:15 PM   #20
Guru
 
BandB's Avatar
 
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
One more potentially dangerous generalization. While I don't argue with anything in the article, ultimately it only applies directly to the single engine under observation. What age engines are we talking about? Where do common rail engines come into play? What type use was the engine set up for initially? And for the answer, back to the manufacturer.

We know temperatures are important. We also know warm up and cool down. We know there is a best load and an acceptable load. I personally believe in varying the speed. In fact, I look back at break in instructions of not running at WOT over x period of time and varying speeds. However, you can take the exact same base engine and it can be built for uses from light fast boats to continuous use slow heavy boats. Then the same engine converted to a generator.

I was recently in a discussion on generators. Specifically someone quoted a Northern Lights sales rep at a show saying not to run under 50%. Well, that's not what Northern Lights says in their literature and that's an old, outdated statement. Engines change. Today's Lugger or John Deere isn't the one from 30 years ago. On that engine, NL says "a generator should never run with less than a 25% load. 35% to 70% is optimal." Makes a huge difference in sizing and in flexibility.

This came up for us in determining what size second generator to use in a boat where the primary is 21.5 kw. Do you go with a "half gen" of 9 to 11 kw or go with two identical 21.5 kw. The 9 to 11 argument is that even at low load you'll be over 50%. However, it turns that generator into only a very occasional use and we've seen boats where the primary generator had 4000 hours and the small gen had 140 hours. So we looked at our loads. Maximum load requirement we have is 16 kw. Minimum which is around 8 kw. Well, either of those is in a reasonable load level for the 21.5. With a 9 to 11 kw generator we could only run minimal items and the moment some others came on it would overload it. Now, we do monitor temperatures, load and other factors.

Know your own equipment. Know what is recommended for it. Know the recommended temperatures and loads. Steve's article is great in that it gives some real examples of what he has seen in engines run constantly and consistently at very low load. Just take that knowledge and combine it with what your engine manufacturer says as to what is appropriate for your engine and ways to monitor it.
BandB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Trawler Port Captains
Port Captains are TF volunteers who can serve as local guides or assist with local arrangements and information. Search below to locate Port Captains near your destination. To learn more about this program read here: TF Port Captain Program





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012