I've been away from the forum for some time, and wonder if the debate between between single and twins has been decided once-and-for-all yet, and if so, what is the decision? I am still a bit on the fence, but leaning more towards a single than before.
The Great Debate
- Thread starter Open-d
- Start date
The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
For a Single, I like the screw protected by the keel, less maintenance, more room to move around the engine, better fuel economy. OTOH, the redundancy of twins is appealing. Oh my aching head.
I am not sure how much service one can get from a get-home engine before it beaks down. 500nm, 1,000?
RT Firefly
Enigma
Lou_tribal
Guru
Why should there be a decision? What do you prefer? Answer this question and you will have your decision.
L
L
Fletcher500
Guru
If we own a single, we say single. Twins...twins. The circle is complete.
BruceK
Moderator Emeritus
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 13,347
- Vessel Name
- Sojourn
- Vessel Make
- Integrity 386
Nothing has changed, it still get`s "decided",every month.
And I still prefer twins.
rsn48
Guru
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2019
- Messages
- 2,019
- Location
- Canada
- Vessel Name
- Capricorn
- Vessel Make
- Mariner 30 - Sedan Cruiser 1969
I had to repower, if I would have had to repower a twin, the boat would be history now. The price even for my gasser all in was around $65,000 with leg replaced, multiple installs due to fitting problems, custom brackets made, custom exhaust made, and a host of other stuff.
You don't even want to think about repowering twins.
You don't even want to think about repowering twins.
The "once and for all" decision is that there are pros and cons of each, and each one of us has to make our own decision based on our own priorities and criteria.
Just like anchors. Just like guns onboard. Just like pretty much everything else in life.
Just like anchors. Just like guns onboard. Just like pretty much everything else in life.
jleonard
Guru
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 5,061
Here’s an observation I have made during MY 30 ish years of boating at my marina.
The guys with twin engine seem to be more lackadaisical on maintenance. They seem more apt to wait for one to fail before they replace things such as impellers tune ups etc. Hence they need twins.
I talking mostly gas engines.
The ones with single have a greater tendency to be pro active on maintenance changing things before they fail cause they can’t afford to break down out there. Hence the one engine is reliable.
My observations only. I’m sure there’s other observations and opinions.
I’m taking cover now
The guys with twin engine seem to be more lackadaisical on maintenance. They seem more apt to wait for one to fail before they replace things such as impellers tune ups etc. Hence they need twins.
I talking mostly gas engines.
The ones with single have a greater tendency to be pro active on maintenance changing things before they fail cause they can’t afford to break down out there. Hence the one engine is reliable.
My observations only. I’m sure there’s other observations and opinions.
I’m taking cover now
Pete Meisinger
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 3,145
- Location
- USA
- Vessel Name
- Best Alternative
- Vessel Make
- 36 Albin Aft Cabin
Yes it was decided recently. A major vote of every boater in the country. All aspects of the choice were fully discussed and debated. Facts and figures were fed into a computer and analyzed. Thousands of images and incidents were considered.
The vote was overwhelmingly almost unanimous.
If I remember correctly:
Single Engine is the choice of discriminating boaters worldwide.
(But then my memory isn't very good or reliable)
pete
The vote was overwhelmingly almost unanimous.
If I remember correctly:
Single Engine is the choice of discriminating boaters worldwide.
(But then my memory isn't very good or reliable)
pete
After a lengthy non-partisan debate, it was concluded by a majority that engines are useful in a power boats. A few rag boat owners tried to skew the results but sophisticated forum members caught onto their ruse immediately.
Woodland Hills
Guru
In South Florida it is not unknown to see center console fishing boats with 4 or 5 350’s. Most of the ones with 400’s have 4, since there is a point of diminishing returns over 3. I sure would like to go for a ride on a 2000hp 35’ er, on a flat day.
Our scout boat on Lake Powell had 550hp on 24’ and it was a thrill ride!
Our scout boat on Lake Powell had 550hp on 24’ and it was a thrill ride!
Last edited:
C lectric
Guru
It will NEVER be decided. As said now and before there are good and bad points.
I've had both and each was the best for me at the time.
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2012
- Messages
- 2,315
- Location
- USA
- Vessel Name
- Sandpiper
- Vessel Make
- Bluewater 40 Pilothouse Trawler
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2012
- Messages
- 2,315
- Location
- USA
- Vessel Name
- Sandpiper
- Vessel Make
- Bluewater 40 Pilothouse Trawler
I agree 100% to your "I agree"
rslifkin
Guru
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
- Messages
- 7,582
- Location
- USA
- Vessel Name
- Hour Glass
- Vessel Make
- Chris Craft 381 Catalina
I tend to find those that use their boats less are the ones that are lazy about maintenance regardless of single vs twin.
Personally, I like twins for maneuverability, but depending on the boat and intended cruising grounds, a single with good prop protection can have some advantages.
I'm fine with long distance travel in a single, as a situation that forces an engine shutdown when you're miles from anything to hit is rarely an emergency. You typically have some time to sort the situation out, etc. However, in crowded waters, loss of an engine can become an emergency very quickly and dropping an anchor immediately isn't always enough to keep the situation from becoming sketchy. So for use in inshore waters, I'm more inclined to want twins, where if one has to be shut down the boat can still be maneuvered to a point where it's safe to work on the problem.
Personally, I like twins for maneuverability, but depending on the boat and intended cruising grounds, a single with good prop protection can have some advantages.
I'm fine with long distance travel in a single, as a situation that forces an engine shutdown when you're miles from anything to hit is rarely an emergency. You typically have some time to sort the situation out, etc. However, in crowded waters, loss of an engine can become an emergency very quickly and dropping an anchor immediately isn't always enough to keep the situation from becoming sketchy. So for use in inshore waters, I'm more inclined to want twins, where if one has to be shut down the boat can still be maneuvered to a point where it's safe to work on the problem.
Nomad Willy
Guru
Lots of people buy twins.
Twins cost more money.
No doubt twins are better.
Case closed.
Twins cost more money.
No doubt twins are better.
Case closed.
mahal
Guru
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 651
I thought the debate had been resolved and the winner being a single with a capable get-home and thrusters.
Such set up will have the redundancy and maneuverability of twins and the prop protection of a single. Although many twins have keels that hang lower than their props.
Such set up will have the redundancy and maneuverability of twins and the prop protection of a single. Although many twins have keels that hang lower than their props.
RT Firefly
Enigma
Greetings,
Mr. s. TWO propulsion systems???? What a novel idea!
Mr. s. TWO propulsion systems???? What a novel idea!
mahal
Guru
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 651
In other words a vessel with two propulsion systems.
Yes. But not twins. Not even fraternal. More like big brother and little brother.
