"So if people are worried about swivels, shackles, splicing links, etc.....weakening their tackle, make dang sure you are comfy with regalvanizing."
Good advice. I have rejected some customer's chain for re-galvanizing and the company that I contract has also rejected some that I thought was okay. Re-galvanizing poor material will only waste money and provide a false sense of security. Often we have recommended cutting off a section of chain before re-galvanizing.
Going back to the original question about rode type, I use 200' of chain and 100' of nylon rode attached to the chain. I inherited the setup when I purchased the boat and it was the same as my prior boat that I designed. There are a number of reasons I like the 200' of chain and the added 100' of rode:
1. My boat likes ride flat on the water when up on plane. The weight in the bow allows for less trim tab use than without that weight. Has nothing to do with anchoring but I believe the added weight is a positive for my particular boat.
2. I normally anchor in locations that do not require the use of the nylon rode (from the look at the rode, neither did the prior owner). However, it is nice security to know the added rode length is there and available if conditions warrant.
3. I am a pretty conservative person on rode length meaning that I try to minimize risk by laying about more rode length than some others. I do not like "short scope" anchoring. However, in situations where is it best to shorten the rode length, I feel more comfortable shortening an "all chain" rode than a combination chain and nylon. I know that others may disagree with this but it goes back to what one is comfortable with. (Actually, I would rather move locations, if possible, than shorten the rode length.)
Steve