|
|
01-16-2021, 01:12 PM
|
#281
|
Guru
City: SF Bay Area
Vessel Model: Tollycraft 34' Tri Cabin
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 12,569
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soo-Valley
ABYC
For $1595 I can take an online course over 9 days and 90 minutes per day. Once I pass for $105 a year I can get access to all these codes that are referenced in surveys.
I get the part that a surveyor should be certified competent by some education and require recertification periodically. We should be able to rely on that.
What pisses me off is when handed a survey stating something is not in compliance I have no way to reassure myself that in fact it is correct.
The TP1332E that boatpoker references can be found here free for the download. ABYC is referenced 32 times more for info as opposed to follow it to the letter. But try to look up an ABYC item without being a member, forget about it, you need the secret handshake.
Earlier I mentioned residential building inspectors. If they stated 'X' is not correct I had the ability to reference the code to verify whether it was opinion or fact.
BP is indeed being picked on after sharing because we have all had surveys we did not agree with. BP is the messenger giving an insight we would only be guessing at. Stop shooting the messenger. Ask why the public cannot get a copy of the reference material of ABYC so often used or misused.
|
Agreed!
" BP is indeed being picked on after sharing because we have all had surveys we did not agree with. BP is the messenger giving an insight we would only be guessing at. Stop shooting the messenger. Ask why the public cannot get a copy of the reference material of ABYC so often used or misused."
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 01:29 PM
|
#282
|
Guru
City: Newport, R.I.
Vessel Name: Hippocampus
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 42
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 3,892
|
Had a boat built for me in mainland China (so met their shipping guidelines) in a yard ABYC and Lloyd’s certified and inspected (so met their guidelines). Went on voyage with a port of NY tug captain, marine insurance broker, ex blue water racer. Of course they went through every nook and cranny of the vessel to fight off boredom. Endless discussions about details. How the boat was bonded, where I unbundled wires for ferrites, gauges of wires, choice of through hulls and how they were done, backing plates -g10 or metal. Every detail you can think of. They picked up a few things I then changed. A dip in the wet exhaust hose from too long a hose. Removing a anti siphon valve. Adding a T to allow a AC water supply pump to be primed after boat was out of the water. ABYC came up repetitively. Repetitively these 3 guys had one bitch or another that they thought it insufficient in places and there was a better way. Or they thought there was several ways to skin the cat and all should be included. I don’t have anything close to the experience nor expertise of that group so can’t comment on if ABYC is good or bad. Or if it’s really not useful as I think EU-A is. But I do think any deficiencies or unsafe situations in a boat should be picked up by a surveyor. Think any deviations from “best practices “ should be noted. And to do so doesn’t require invoking ABYC or any other guidelines. If any guidelines were to be put in a footnote to outline corrective measures have no issue but even this shouldn’t really be necessary. I think the boater wants to know “what’s wrong with this boat?. What’s it worth?” Insurer or bank wants to know “is this a good risk at this valuation?”. See ABYC or any rating tangential to those questions. They are helpful in understanding current “best practices “ but neither represent a ceiling or floor (land based used of those words not nautical).
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 01:39 PM
|
#283
|
Guru
City: Newport, R.I.
Vessel Name: Hippocampus
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 42
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 3,892
|
BP-I’m curious do you have any issues with ABYC? Or was that group biased?
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 01:54 PM
|
#284
|
Guru
City: Here
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippocampus
BP-I’m curious do you have any issues with ABYC? Or was that group biased?
|
I do have a few disagreements with ABYC but I also disagree with some of CFRs, TP1332, ABS, CE, UL and NFPA and that is why I specify in my comments section which comments are legal requirements, the various standards or my personal opinion. Please read the first paragraph of my "COMMENTS" section. No standard or law is perfect but I do believe they are needed.
The aims of ABYC and the position of their standards in the boating world is much at odds with many of the opinions here. The preface from the standards are worth reading. Hope it's readable ....
For those offended by ABYC, they can easily join and become a member of one or more of the technical boards and have a say in those standards.
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 02:25 PM
|
#285
|
Guru
City: Powell River, BC
Vessel Name: Northern Spy
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 26
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,075
|
Most standards you have to pay for or have a subscription service.
ASME, API, ANSI, CSA, NEC, IEEE, ISO are all standards off the top of my head that you have to pay for, many of which have been adopted as code in many jurisdictions.
ABYC is no exception.
I'm fortunate to have an IHS subscription. ABYC is not included unfortunately.
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 02:46 PM
|
#286
|
Guru
City: Newport, R.I.
Vessel Name: Hippocampus
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 42
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 3,892
|
Excellent post BP.
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 02:54 PM
|
#287
|
Guru
City: st pete
Vessel Model: 430 Mainship
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,502
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Spy
Most standards you have to pay for or have a subscription service.
ASME, API, ANSI, CSA, NEC, IEEE, ISO are all standards off the top of my head that you have to pay for, many of which have been adopted as code in many jurisdictions.
ABYC is no exception.
I'm fortunate to have an IHS subscription. ABYC is not included unfortunately.
|
Yes, you have to pay for ABYC, and for some of us it's worth it. I have been a member for quite some time, but cancelled this year because of my boating activities slowing down a bit. But will pick it up later. They have a lot of good courses, some free and some you pay for. For "me", well worth it.
And, correct, not required, but a lot of it is good standards to pay attention to.
And while some of our boats are many years older and don't comply with ABYC standards, there's sure some thoughts to update as prudent. Things change, often for the better and little downside of being aware of it. Better products, better ways of doing things, etc.
BP, I appreciate your comments and respect your position. We can learn a lot from you.
__________________
Seevee
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 04:19 PM
|
#288
|
Guru
City: Great Lakes
Vessel Model: OA 440
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 906
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boatpoker
.... I specify in my comments section which comments are legal requirements, the various standards or my personal opinion. Please read the first paragraph of my "COMMENTS" section. No standard or law is perfect but I do believe they are needed.
|
It's not clear if the excerpt from the attached report is for a Canadian boat, a U.S. boat, or if it's a pleasure boat or commercial. In any case your introduction to the Comments section in your report says "Comments based on a specific authority are identified as such." In item A(5) you list NFPA 302 and ABYC. In the U.S., ABYC and possibly NFPA are not an authority in the legal sense. The ABYC material later in your attachment says their material is "advisory only, their use is entirely voluntary". Why are you using advisory only material in a "must do" section? Further, your "must" language suggests you are a representative of the government. Are you?
Your ABYC quote regarding propane system design is completely unrelated to the the issue...."rust". That quote in this context is extraneous and nonsensical.
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 05:15 PM
|
#289
|
Guru
City: Here
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,940
|
Sorry for the edits ... having a hard time getting the photo attached.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus
It's not clear if the excerpt from the attached report is for a Canadian boat, a U.S. boat, or if it's a pleasure boat or commercial. In any case your introduction to the Comments section in your report says "Comments based on a specific authority are identified as such." In item A(5) you list NFPA 302 and ABYC. In the U.S., ABYC and possibly NFPA are not an authority in the legal sense. The ABYC material later in your attachment says their material is "advisory only, their use is entirely voluntary". Why are you using advisory only material in a "must do" section? Further, your "must" language suggests you are a representative of the government. Are you?
Your ABYC quote regarding propane system design is completely unrelated to the the issue...."rust". That quote in this context is extraneous and nonsensical.
|
1. Whether Canadian, US, Bahamian pleasure or commercial is covered in the vessel description at the front of the survey report. You can check that from samples on my website.
2. Comments based on a specific authority ... Naming ABYC as one of the authorities I believe is justified as they are routinely accepted by courts and underwriters as an authority on the matter.
3. The "must do" section includes my opinion on what must be done and that is clearly indicated as "my opinion". (most people hire me for my opinion).
4."Rust". The rust comment is followed by a period as rust is not covered in any code or standard. I then cite the issues contravening ABYC in a separate paragraph. For a full understanding of this or any of my other "comments one must refer to the body of the survey. Below is the body section covering the propane system.
|
|
|
01-16-2021, 09:44 PM
|
#290
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
Surveyors are hired for their professional opinions. Those may be based on many varied resources. We've had boats surveyed to meet Class requirements and those surveyors must use the Class documents. But the reality is we're using professionals and paying for their opinions. I've had 6 boats surveyed and been extremely happy with all, but all were new. However, I can site South Florida surveyors who have incredible reputations among my captains and engineers and many others I've known to use them. But then I'm happy with the lawyers and the CPA I use too.
The key is selection. I know some just want a sign off, not a good complete survey.
I compare it to a public company being audited. They cover all the requirements to complete audited financial statements. Then come the management recommendations. A lot of managers resent those. I figure I spent tens or hundreds of thousands meeting government requirements and they were there for weeks, I want their observations as that's the only operational benefit I'll receive. This is much like comments or recommendations on surveys. I want to know what they saw that they would change perhaps in the future. Sometimes it's minor but we had one where it was two galley cabinets didn't remain secure when closed. We made the manufacturer immediately correct that before everything went flying across the floor. We had a recommendation for rerouting some plumbing to the other side of some equipment and our engineers addressed that a week or so later.
As to Boatpoker choosing his customers on any basis he chooses other than those prohibited that's his right. I do the same. I once refused to do business with someone who later became President. I refuse regularly to sell to people I don't want representing me and to those I feel there's a risk they won't pay. We all have to decide.
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 01:18 AM
|
#291
|
Guru
City: Edgewater, MD
Vessel Name: Catalina Jack
Vessel Model: Defever 44
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,585
|
"3. The "must do" section includes my opinion on what must be done and that is clearly indicated as "my opinion". (most people hire me for my opinion)."
When a surveyor makes a "must do" recommendation, whether qualified or not as his opinion, no underwriter will give it a pass. That is the essence of this entire discussion. Even a recommendation that is not termed a "must do", if that recommendation is footnoted to an ABYC recommendation, that, too, becomes a "must do" in the eyes of an underwriter. And that, folks, is where some surveyors do a disservice to boaters. Surveyors who do this, if effect, are rewriting the recommendations to suit their opinion of what "must" done because, when an underwriter sees "ABYC" in any context they invariably default to "must".
Boatpoker, surely you know this to be fact. Now, if in your opinion, this is the "correct" way to write reports, just say so. But, to use esoteric examples to support your opinion on writing reports is, quite simply, deflection.
I'm still waiting for your opinion on what was wrong with the electrical outlet in one of the pictures you posted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boatpoker
Sorry for the edits ... having a hard time getting the photo attached.
1. Whether Canadian, US, Bahamian pleasure or commercial is covered in the vessel description at the front of the survey report. You can check that from samples on my website.
2. Comments based on a specific authority ... Naming ABYC as one of the authorities I believe is justified as they are routinely accepted by courts and underwriters as an authority on the matter.
3. The "must do" section includes my opinion on what must be done and that is clearly indicated as "my opinion". (most people hire me for my opinion).
4."Rust". The rust comment is followed by a period as rust is not covered in any code or standard. I then cite the issues contravening ABYC in a separate paragraph. For a full understanding of this or any of my other "comments one must refer to the body of the survey. Below is the body section covering the propane system.
|
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 07:27 AM
|
#292
|
Guru
City: Fort Myers, FL... Summers in the Great Lakes
Vessel Name: Slow Hand
Vessel Model: Cherubini Independence 45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catalinajack
I'm still waiting for your opinion on what was wrong with the electrical outlet in one of the pictures you posted.
|
He already answered that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boatpoker
The outlet is not in a (UL approved) junction box. any short will occur directly against wood therefore a fire hazard. I know of one fire caused by a mouse (a liveaboard ) getting jammed between the outlet and the wood causing a short.
Not to worry, this is not illegal in the US so won't be mentioned in a survey report
|
Ted
__________________
Blog: mvslowhand.com
I'm tired of fast moves, I've got a slow groove, on my mind.....
I want to spend some time, Not come and go in a heated rush.....
"Slow Hand" by The Pointer Sisters
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 07:46 AM
|
#293
|
Guru
City: Here
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catalinajack
But, to use esoteric examples to support your opinion on writing reports is, quite simply, deflection.
|
I think we speak different languages. When I ask a question it's to gain an answer or gather further information. I'm sorry, if you see answering quesions with actual examples of how I work as "deflection" If that is "deflection", I simply don't know how to answer you.
The first thing I tell any potential client is "Please look at the sample reports on my website so that you understand exactly what I do or don't do". If after reviewing examples of my work and completing other due diligence, they may choose to hire me or not and I'm ok with that.
If on the other hand I get the sense that I may not like dealing with this person ... I'll be too busy to take on the job
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 08:59 AM
|
#294
|
Guru
City: Baltimore
Vessel Name: Sea life
Vessel Model: Krogen 42 #61
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 686
|
It seems the big complaints here could be directed at the insurance companies just as easily as they are being directed at BP. After all that is what is upsetting you guys. Having to spend money as directed by your insurance company to comply with voluntary safety requirements as pointed out in a survey.
Just a thought...
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 09:48 AM
|
#295
|
Guru
City: SF Bay Area
Vessel Model: Tollycraft 34' Tri Cabin
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 12,569
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boatpoker
I think we speak different languages. When I ask a question it's to gain an answer or gather further information. I'm sorry, if you see answering quesions with actual examples of how I work as "deflection" If that is "deflection", I simply don't know how to answer you.
The first thing I tell any potential client is "Please look at the sample reports on my website so that you understand exactly what I do or don't do". If after reviewing examples of my work and completing other due diligence, they may choose to hire me or not and I'm ok with that.
If on the other hand I get the sense that I may not like dealing with this person ... I'll be too busy to take on the job
|
BINGO! - I handle my contract building business exactly the same way. In regard to zeroing in as to whether any project is good for the customer and me to interactively accomplish. Pretty simple... either it appears there is a symbiotic business relation about to transverse - or not! Either way if fine with me.
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 09:56 AM
|
#296
|
Guru
City: Great Lakes
Vessel Model: OA 440
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 906
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BandB
Surveyors are hired for their professional opinions.
|
Periodic condition surveys are required by insurance companies. At least one allows customers to conduct their own. When a hired surveyor goes beyond a condition survey and states that he/she believes (and infers in a report) that old legacy systems must be redesigned to the latest industry guidelines (not government regulations) for for new construction, that is an opinion which crosses the line. As stated previously, SAMS leadership told me a surveyor who did so regarding my boat was out of line. BP's stated practices are out of line.
SAMS/NAMS clearly don't police their surveyor membership, nor do most insurance companies who don't have a clue what's happening from a technical perspective. I raised holy hell with my insurer (and SAMS) when I came across a renegade surveyor who was waving around ABYC guidelines in regard to system upgrades. The insurance company subsequently instituted a customer conducted self survey...a checklist backed up by scores of digital photographs. They have competent staff (some of them former surveyors) to review the submittals. They trust their customers more than they trust the surveyor community. Self surveys for insurance renewals should be an industry wide practice. Y'all can make it happen.
For the most part, buyer surveys are negotiating weapons.
Having surveyors set market value is absurd.
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 12:11 PM
|
#297
|
Guru
City: Here
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,940
|
[QUOTE=Rufus;965491]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BandB
BP's stated practices are out of line.
|
That is a complaint I've heard frequently over the decades.
Never from a client but only from sellers and yacht brokers and I'm a little proud of that.
It also shows I have some skill in weeding out undesirable clients.
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 12:29 PM
|
#298
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sealife
It seems the big complaints here could be directed at the insurance companies just as easily as they are being directed at BP. After all that is what is upsetting you guys. Having to spend money as directed by your insurance company to comply with voluntary safety requirements as pointed out in a survey.
Just a thought...
|
Ultimately the insurance companies don't generally force that. Some entry level person may misinterpret but reaching the real decision makers, the ones in charge, you can get by without doing all the items and reach agreement.
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 12:35 PM
|
#299
|
Guru
City: Here
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,940
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BandB
Ultimately the insurance companies don't generally force that. Some entry level person may misinterpret but reaching the real decision makers, the ones in charge, you can get by without doing all the items and reach agreement.
|
I agree. I've had many calls from insurers wishing to discuss a finding.
I've also called many on behalf of clients when they underwriters made silly demands like "refreshing the bottom paint".
|
|
|
01-17-2021, 12:36 PM
|
#300
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
[QUOTE=boatpoker;965526]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus
That is a complaint I've heard frequently over the decades.
Never from a client but only from sellers and yacht brokers and I'm a little proud of that.
It also shows I have some skill in weeding out undesirable clients.
|
You just quoted me as saying your practices were out of line. I don't think I ever said that unless I misspoke my intention, but looks like a snippet, misrepresentative. Please provide the post number or full quote. I said all along it's your right. Is this a Rufus quote of me or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|