“Trawlers”
Since most of us do not troll for fish, shrimp, etc., let’s agree that our use of “trawler” means trawler-like pleasure boats. As one writer said decades ago, a trawler should have a whiff of workboat about it. So, work boat design similarity should be a factor. And if “form follows function” is a design factor, sea-keeping influences should be considered, especially a hull that stands up to a variety of winds and seas with safety and some degree of comfort while remaining on station or on mission. Long legs appropriate for extended transits or exploring remote areas well beyond comfy marinas surely is a must. Reliability beyond most other boat designs and their on board systems should be a factor. Diesels surely fit. If you are planning to transit NW logging territory, the Dismal Swamp Canal or the Alligator-Pungo Canal, etc., a full keel with a skeg protected shaft, prop and rudder mean a lot. Fly bridge? Look at the tuna boats.
Efficiency at trolling speeds surely is a design feature. But many real trollers have get home urgency to bring in a fresh catch, or to wisely avoid dangerous weather.
Accommodations? Yachty is OK, but so is practical, once again form fitting function as true fishing trawlers are. Being able to sleep and feed captain and crew on extended voyages between marinas and resupply matter.
We can all think of boats that meet all of these criteria, some purposely fewer, and others with little in common with these criteria. So, interpret, disagree, apply in good conscience, and share your thoughts. It would be nice to have more consensus on what constitutes a recreational trawler, and accept that some really great cruisers aren’t trawlers, and some long legged Passagemakers aren’t trawlers. Let’s accept that the shoe should fit relatively painlessly, and that we have wonderful dock mates whose lovely boats are something other than trawlers.