Okeechobee

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

JDM

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
18
Location
USA
Vessel Name
Ancient Mariner
Vessel Make
Hyatt Voyager
Thinking about a January trip through the canal from Stewart to Lake Okachobee to the West Florida Coast. Anyone been this way since last summers red tide mess?
 
The red tide was along the western shore of FL.Not in Lake O

Mostly caused by iron laden sand dust blowing from Africa.

We are a mile short of the Ortona Lock when westbound.

Have a modest amount of power woodworking equipment if you wish to dock overnight , free of course.
 
Okeechobee waterway and lake were clear of algae and any red tide from Stuart to Fort Myers, when I went through in the middle of November.

Ted
 
The state red tide map shows mostly gone
 
I will be crossing in January. The thing I am keeping an eye on is lake level. It should not be a problem in January but it could be in May if historical levels hold. Normally levels drop from January to June.
 
I ran into some red tide in my 2016 cruise to Alaska and ran right through it. What am I missing?
 
I will be crossing in January. The thing I am keeping an eye on is lake level. It should not be a problem in January but it could be in May if historical levels hold. Normally levels drop from January to June.

You can get the lake levels and navigational depths from the USACE or Waterway guide. Starting to get skinnier, less than 7' on the main route and less than 5' on the rim. Good idea to get the lake marine forecast as well :

https://www.waterwayguide.com/nav-a..._12-14-2018&utm_content=Nav+Alerts+12-14-2018
 
We are at the lowest levels in the last 10 years. Hope the Corp has a handle on it.[emoji33] pdf00001.jpeg181004-A-CE999-052-1068x606.jpeg
 
Can someone explain the difference between the listed "Lake Okeechobee elevation" of 12.8' and the navigation depth which is 6.74'? Does that mean elevation above sea level maybe? Nothing to do with the depth of the water?
 
12.8' is sea level reference. The other is min channel level.
 
Thanks Dave. I swear I remember a crossing the lake thread from last year in which someone stated that above 12' was considered pretty good. Sure doesn't sound like it. I guess 6' depth would be just fine as long as there isn't anything on the bottom of the lake. I'm not at a point where I know enough to take that bet. Asking because we are thinking about crossing for a short trip to visit family on the other coast.
 
We crossed in late May 2017. The level was at 11'. That year we knew people with bigger boats 5'+ drafts who had to go down to the Keys and up, rather than risk Lake O. We have 3.5' draft so we get away with more.
 
I'm at 4'3" and risk adverse (some call it paranoid) when I haven't done something before. Going across knowing I only have 2' under my keel at best would be the longest day in my short little trawler career. Level looks to be in a straight dive since mid September with no end in sight. I also have to come back at some point.
 
I'm at 4'3" and risk adverse (some call it paranoid) when I haven't done something before. Going across knowing I only have 2' under my keel at best would be the longest day in my short little trawler career. Level looks to be in a straight dive since mid September with no end in sight. I also have to come back at some point.


With a 4' draft and planning this very crossing, I'm very interested in Lake O and its levels. I've done some research on it and I'm pretty sure I've come to grips with the reality.

Right or wrong, here in the NE if I only have a couple of feet under my keel I'm VERY concerned since the bottom is so changeable. The way I look at the FL waterways is that the bottom is pretty flat. (of course there are always exceptions). Lake O is not a very deep lake anywhere. I think the max depth is like 15'. When the min depth is listed as 6', that means the most shallow area in the channel is 6' but generally its more (say 8 or 10', but it could be more depending on lake level) For the crossing I think there's only one or two spots to be particularly careful about. But when they say 6' they mean that is the min anywhere in the channel.

Ken
 
We crossed east to west 10 days ago. We draw 5 feet and had no issues. Stayed in the channel and the least depth we saw was 1 1/2 feet under our keel.
 
Glad you made it ok. Any particular issue with the locks? They seem very straight forward as far as locks go. Haven't been through one in 40 years or so. Was going to drive down and watch for a while one afternoon just to see. St. Lucie Lock isn't too far from the house.
 
"We are at the lowest levels in the last 10 years. Hope the Corp has a handle on it.
emoji33.png
"

Last time the lake level was low the expected rains did not come with enough volume to raise the lake.

In many areas the water was hundreds of feet from shore which was really hard on businesses that cater to vacationing small boat fisherman.

Even harder on birds that nested on small islands as predators could walk to the islands and lightning strike fires were not contained.
 
Any particular issue with the locks? They seem very straight forward as far as locks go. Haven't been through one in 40 years or so. Was going to drive down and watch for a while one afternoon just to see. St. Lucie Lock isn't too far from the house.


No issues with the locks, Clewiston and Port Mayaca were open, we just drove through. Call ahead to the lockmasters at Port Mayaca, even though the lock doors are wide open, they will call back to let you know no one is coming in from the other direction at the same time. Clewiston lock was unmanned.
When we were approaching the tie along dock at Roland Martin's Marina, our early depth alarm went off for a couple of seconds, it is set to sound at 2' below our rudders which is a total depth of 6'. That is the only time in the crossing that it sounded. I don't recall having any other concern for depth along the way.
The locks are the only ones I have ever been through that do not have valves. Once you are in and the doors behind you close, they crack the upstream doors open about a foot and the water flows in to fill the lock.
Interesting the first time.
We crossed November 27th through 29th, 2 1/2 weeks ago.
 
The locks are very straightforward. Minimal elevation change, 2-3 feet at most, and no turbulence in the locks. At every lock there are lines you can grab that hang down from the top. All you have to do is figure out what side you are going to hang on to (ask the lock master if one side or the other is required) and deploy a couple of fenders accordingly. If your timing is good it is a 15 minute process.

We left Stuart at daybreak and tied up to the dolphin pilings on the west side of the Ortona lock the first night. Anchored next to Useppa Island the second night. Third day was half day trip to Long Boat Key.
 
The locks are very straightforward. Minimal elevation change, 2-3 feet at most, and no turbulence in the locks. At every lock there are lines you can grab that hang down from the top. All you have to do is figure out what side you are going to hang on to (ask the lock master if one side or the other is required) and deploy a couple of fenders accordingly. If your timing is good it is a 15 minute process.

We left Stuart at daybreak and tied up to the dolphin pilings on the west side of the Ortona lock the first night. Anchored next to Useppa Island the second night. Third day was half day trip to Long Boat Key.

The locks can be quite a bit more than 3 feet. St Lucie and Franklin are both subject to tide level. St Lucie can be 8'+

Ted
 
I am at River Forest in Stuart and have to go thru 1 lock to go east. I am leaving on the 27th of December and wonder if the government shuts down will the locks be operating. Any of you remember if the Corp operated the locks in the last government shutdown. I guess that was around 98.
 
Don't know about locks specifically, but I do know that during the last "shut down" not everything was shut down. Things that were considered "critical" were still operating.


And, of course, the decision about what is "critical" or not is made entirely based on political considerations, not on the actual criticality of it.


Oh yeah, and all the talk about federal employees losing money... No, that doesn't happen either. As soon as they come to a budget agreement everyone gets all of the back pay that they would have gotten, so it just turns out to be an extended, paid vacation for those that don't have to work. My sister-in-law, who works within the federal court system, is desperately HOPING for a "shut down!"
 
"My sister-in-law, who works within the federal court system, is desperately HOPING for a "shut down!"


Along with a million other federal employees.
 
Last edited:
I just came across the OWW 2 days ago in our DeFever 44 and had no issues with water depth. The controlling depth is in reference to some skinny spots along the rim canal. The depth in the lake (Route 1) is fine.

St Lucia lock had a 8’ lift the day we went through, the others were minimal.

Mike
 
Just a quick question for "Firstbase". Please tell me your wifes name is not Susan!!

Nope! Sheree. When we named the boat we didn't have a clue that virtually no one except Maryland'ers would know that a Black Eyed Susan is the State Flower of Maryland. When we are both on the boat everyone who passes by gives me a nasty look and whispers something about "that poor woman". Maybe I should name the dinghy Wife-Beater. Really get them going.

Sorry, that was insensitive and inappropriate.
 
I just came across the OWW 2 days ago in our DeFever 44 and had no issues with water depth. The controlling depth is in reference to some skinny spots along the rim canal. The depth in the lake (Route 1) is fine.

St Lucia lock had a 8’ lift the day we went through, the others were minimal.

Mike

The USACE quotes controlling depths separately for each route. Route 1 is the trans-lake route, 2 the rim route.

USACE Jacksonville District
 
Back
Top Bottom