 |
|
05-04-2018, 01:13 PM
|
#21
|
Guru
City: Great Lakes
Vessel Model: OA 440
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rufus
here's the palmer johnson interpretation of the "sponson" concept. Wonder what happened to pj after they sold the operation to a european entity....
Attachment 75942
|
|
|
|
05-04-2018, 07:11 PM
|
#22
|
Guru
City: Boston Area
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,562
|
There are videos on Youtube from both boats involved in the collision.
To me, it certainly looks like the Ady Gil accelerated just before the collision.
Sea Shepherd agreed to pay the whalers 2.5 million dollars for the collision.
And the Captain of the Ady Gil has admitted to intentionally scuttling the Ady Gil, on Paul Watson's orders, as a ratings stunt for the Reality TV Show "Whale Wars".
Whaling in this day and age is an unconscionable act that is un excusable. However, when a protester has to create false evidence to support their cause, it undermines the reasons for that cause. Paul Watson, as the head of SSCS, has wasted the donations of millions of dollars chasing publicity rather than furthering the cause he claims to be so dedicated to. He is hurting the environmental movement by diverting dollars from respectable organizations that genuinely care about the health of our planet to his group of publicity hounding radicals.
The Ady Gil was an incredible vessel and held the record for circumnavigating the globe in 61 days. That's a significant piece of martime history to send to the bottom for some TV viewers !!
|
|
|
05-04-2018, 07:23 PM
|
#23
|
Guru
City: Sydney
Vessel Name: Sojourn
Vessel Model: Integrity 386
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13,041
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiltrider1
While I don’t approve of Sea Shepard’s tactics, I view japan’s continued whaling practices more deplorable. The two deserve each other.
Second, the Japanese whaling ship was most definitely at fault. It had complete ability to avoid the collision at all times. I,m not saying the Ady Gil is absolved of any wrong doing. Rule number one take proper actions to avoid collisions.
|
By continuing whaling in the southern ocean,Japan virtually ignores the decision Australia won in the International Court of Justice. Seems to me that justifies Sea Shepherd taking strong action in the face of Japan`s contempt of the Court decision.
I have no issue with Sea Shepherd operating here, I welcome it. They are doing what the Aust Govt won`t do,attempting to enforce the ICJ decision.
__________________
BruceK
2005 Integrity 386 "Sojourn"
Sydney Australia
|
|
|
05-04-2018, 07:29 PM
|
#24
|
Guru
City: Quebec
Vessel Name: Bleuvet
Vessel Model: Custom Built
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,277
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceK
By continuing whaling in the southern ocean,Japan virtually ignores the decision Australia won in the International Court of Justice. Seems to me that justifies Sea Shepherd taking strong action in the face of Japan`s contempt of the Court decision.
I have no issue with Sea Shepherd operating here, I welcome it. They are doing what the Aust Govt won`t do,attempting to enforce the ICJ decision.
|
And to add my 2 cents, we may agree or disagree with the unconventional method but at least they try to do something...
L
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 10:30 AM
|
#25
|
Guru
City: Gig Harbor
Vessel Name: Kinship
Vessel Model: North Pacific 43
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9,045
|
Fast trawler
Benthic2, you have nicely expressed my thoughts on Sea Shepherd. While I agree with the others that the continued Japanese whaling it unconscionable, I think that Sea Shepherd has taken their tactics too far.
Using the same arguments and methods one might expect environmentalists to try and run semi-trucks off the road that are delivering hazardous cargo.
If Sea Shepherd wants to get between the whaling ships and whales, that is fine. But many of their encounters seem to be nothing but harassment designed, as Benthic2 pointed out, to improve ratings and donations.
Keep in mind that I’m on the opposite side of the world however and not nearly as informed our our Aussie friends.
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 12:26 PM
|
#26
|
Guru
City: Kitimat, North Coast BC
Vessel Name: Badger
Vessel Model: 30' Sundowner Tug
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,946
|
Here's an extreme example, speed wise, but hints at how these boats handle rough conditions:
__________________
"The most interesting path between two points is not a straight line" MurrayM
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 04:19 PM
|
#27
|
TF Site Team
City: Brisbane
Vessel Name: Insequent
Vessel Model: Ocean Alexander 50 Mk I
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,090
|
The slo' mo plunge at the end was impressive. I don't think I would have enjoyed being on board the first time though!
__________________
Brian
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 04:55 PM
|
#28
|
Guru
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,700
|
WH wrote;
“IMHO only a full displacement recreational vessel designed to cross oceans in foul weather should be called a "trawler"
Well Mr Hills there’s very few trawlers that are FD. You’re thinking of the Passagemaker.
__________________
Eric
North Western Washington State USA
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 06:27 PM
|
#29
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benthic2
The Ady Gil was an incredible vessel and held the record for circumnavigating the globe in 61 days. That's a significant piece of martime history to send to the bottom for some TV viewers !!
|
True. But it also had an ugly reputation of having killed a Guatemalan fisherman in a collision in the dark with a fishing vessel while it (Earthrace) was travelling at a high rate of speed in limited visibility.
I understand risking your own life to set some kind of a record, but putting other lives at risk in the process it is a whole different story.
It makes me wonder how much they had to pay to all that were involved in Guatemala to be able to leave quickly and not get in trouble with the law.
Whale Wars was a good comedy show. I kinda miss it.
|
|
|
05-05-2018, 10:01 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
City: tallahassee
Vessel Model: 1979 Mainship 34
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 415
|
Hope it sinks.
|
|
|
05-06-2018, 09:22 AM
|
#31
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
|
“IMHO only a full displacement recreational vessel designed to cross oceans in foul weather should be called a "trawler"
The required scantlings and systems required , added to the lack of interior room due to tanks and stores mean few 50 fters could be called "trawlers" , perhaps 1 in 100?
The cost difference between an ocean crossing vessel and a lakes and bays TT would be 3 to 4 times as expensive.
Not many folks have learned to enjoy weeks or a month at sea.
|
|
|
05-06-2018, 01:42 PM
|
#32
|
Guru
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,166
|
That is a wave piercing design with very little buoyancy in the bow section
|
|
|
05-06-2018, 02:29 PM
|
#33
|
Guru
City: Jacksonville
Vessel Name: Alzero
Vessel Model: Hatteras 63' CPMY
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FF
“IMHO only a full displacement recreational vessel designed to cross oceans in foul weather should be called a "trawler"
The required scantlings and systems required , added to the lack of interior room due to tanks and stores mean few 50 fters could be called "trawlers" , perhaps 1 in 100?
The cost difference between an ocean crossing vessel and a lakes and bays TT would be 3 to 4 times as expensive.
Not many folks have learned to enjoy weeks or a month at sea.
|
That is why most boats sold as trawlers from Grand Banks to Flemings are are SD hulled motor yachts styled and marketed as "trawlers". Buyers want the romance of a real Beebe style passagemaker, but their actual needs and useage demand a different boat. Like sailors with a Tahiti Ketch or a Colin Archer pilot boat that gets used for daysails and weekends.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|