Lobster Pots in the middle of a channel

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Lobster traps aren't cheap, if the CG just did an occasional sweep of channels they would quit dropping them there. But it is an issue outside of the channels as well. In Maine you will find them in 300' of water and 15 miles offshore, guarding the approaches to major harbors.

Oh yeah...I'm sure the Coast Guard would be agreeable to that idea. They don't have enough to do as it is.:facepalm:
They (trap floats) really aren't that big of a deal; especially for slower moving trawlers and such. If you keep an adequate watch posted ,there's really no reason to be fouled by one. They're not randomly strewn about; they're in a certain depth for a reason. Figure out where they are & move offshore or inshore. Take note of the tide & wind & stay below the float & it's offending line. Leaving a trackline on the plotter is helpful for a return trip if pots are thick.
I honestly cannot remember ever winding a pot up in a wheel. Have I ever had to take immediate evasive action? Heck yeah. But so far after 50+ years of owning/captaining/running boats of every size,speed & style, I haven't had any catastrophes involving anyone's commercial fishing gear.
Just saying...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you see every buoy out there.... either you are kidding yourself or only run in bright daylight, on calm days, and there zero semi ghost traps or underwater floats where you boat....
 
If you see every buoy out there.... either you are kidding yourself or only run in bright daylight, on calm days, and there zero semi ghost traps or underwater floats where you boat....

No I'm not kidding myself. When I make a statement on here, it's because I know what I'm talking about. Not to add another number to my post count.
If you're referring to my post, take note of the part about keeping a vigilant watch and yes, making a quick turn to get around an obstacle that suddenly pops into view.
10-4?
 
OK, but my experiences lead me to a different conclusion.

you like many on here know what tbey are talking about....

but I will admit to not being able to see underwater.....
 
Last edited:
It has been pointed out that this is a farming operation, not a fishing operation. Well baited traps are dropped, and as you can see a lot of them. When they are raised, the younger smaller lobsters, well fed on the bait, are thrown back. The larger legal ones are kept and marketed. It is not inconceivable that many lobsters never eat anything but bait from traps. That is farming, or perhaps ranching.
 
A good case for line cutters / spurs on the prop shaft...


Do they work? I have been disabled by a lobster trap in the middle of the Chanel. But cutters are not cheap and require hauling to install. But if I had any feedback from someone that was actually helped by them I might do it. But so far all I have is"Tiger Powder" reports,"I have them and never have any trouble." Maybe they never hit one!!
 
They (trap floats) really aren't that big of a deal; especially for slower moving trawlers and such. If you keep an adequate watch posted ,there's really no reason to be fouled by one. They're not randomly strewn about; they're in a certain depth for a reason. Figure out where they are & move offshore or inshore. Take note of the tide & wind & stay below the float & it's offending line. Leaving a trackline on the plotter is helpful for a return trip if pots are thick.

This completely contrary to my experience. What you say was true in Canada, and to a great extent south of Maine. In Maine, there are areas which are covered with pots, "randomly strewn about" at any depth from 10 to 400', and far too thick to even imagine in your dreams that a GPS track line will guide you through them. The distance between them is less than the GPS precision, and they float about with the tide. We haven't mentioned the ones with the line set to short, so that they are hiding a couple of feet under water when the tide is in, but there's plenty of those too. There are pots all over harbor, mooring fields, and anchorages. I've seen a line of them set right across the approach to fuel docks.

With great vigilance you can usually avoid the pots, during the day in good weather. Add some whitecaps, a bit of fog, and a dark night and you have only prayer. Absolutely no way you will see them all or even a majority. Approaching Northeast Harbor at 4 AM under sail, we got hung up on one 15 miles out in 250'. When daylight broke you could see them everywhere. There was no route into the harbor that was clear of them. At night they were essentially invisible.
 
Last edited:
On a trip from Tampa to Corpus Christi I found many crab traps set in a line down the center of the ICW across the Big Bend of Florida. That channel is marked with a single buoy about every3 miles. In the fog I used the lines of crab traps as a map to the next buoy. Just stayed 50 feet to one side. Great navigation aid.


The one time I was totally disabled it was by a 8' length of 3" diameter poly mourning line that had been dislodged from deep in the mud by a dredging operation on the ICW. Cutters would not have helped with that. I was towed in and then had a diver cut it all off. I kept it as a trophy.
 
Last edited:
I'll reiterate that at least in my experience, there is Maine, and there is the rest of the world. And there is no comparison between the two.
 
I saw this all over Narragansett Bay in RI. Even in the main shipping channel! There was no clear navigatable path up the bay and as the fishermen use little clear or white bottles to mark their traps, with any chop at all, they are near invisible.
It is the job of the USCG to ensure that the navigatable channels in the US are clear of obstacles to safe navigation, but apparently in the North East lobster fishing is more important to them than the safety of the maritime public in their waters.
I finally bought a set of spurs and ignore them now, hopefully costing the lobstermen a pretty piece of change every time I hit one and cut their trap line.

Every time you see a trap in a marked navigatable channel, call the CG on VHF channel 16 and raise a ruckus. Also, call them by phone and make a formal report/complaint. Maybe if enough folks complain, they'll stop hassling boaters over minor details and get off their lazy a$$es and do something that will really help improve the safety of boaters in these waters!
 
Maybe if enough folks complain, they'll stop hassling boaters over minor details and get off their lazy a$$es and do something that will really help improve the safety of boaters in these waters!
No that this is relevant to this thread, but since you went there...
I'm sorry but that characterization of our Coast Guard does not match my experience at all. I am extremely appreciative of their presence and their actions, and would never describe them as "lazy". While no person or organization is perfect, their service saves many lives and gives me the safety net that enables me to cruise.
 
Every time you see a trap in a marked navigatable channel, call the CG on VHF channel 16 and raise a ruckus. Also, call them by phone and make a formal report/complaint. Maybe if enough folks complain, they'll stop hassling boaters over minor details and get off their lazy a$$es and do something that will really help improve the safety of boaters in these waters!

I find this to be an unfair characterization of the USCG. They are not 'hassling' boaters. They are performing safety inspections to enforce safety regulations. This is in our best interest to reduce our risks and the time, risk and cost of S&R's, which we all share in the burden of cost as taxpayers.

These are hard-working folks, who work long hours for little pay, and I've seen no evidence to substantiate your claims.
 
I'll reiterate that at least in my experience, there is Maine, and there is the rest of the world. And there is no comparison between the two.

I would certainly tend to agree, but there are parts of the Keys and SW FL that try to give it a run for its money in certain seasons. Especially those little black buoys. There was one trip where every time I set the autopilot, it seemed like one would immediately pop up from the bottom straight ahead; got kinda spooky.

Northumberland Strait twixt PEI and New Brunswick puts up a good contest too. I managed to get a lobster pot water skiing behind my buddy's Hatteras 42LRC... no sign of any buoy and we were keeping a pretty close watch.... I thought.
 
I saw this all over Narragansett Bay in RI. Even in the main shipping channel! There was no clear navigatable path up the bay and as the fishermen use little clear or white bottles to mark their traps, with any chop at all, they are near invisible.
It is the job of the USCG to ensure that the navigatable channels in the US are clear of obstacles to safe navigation, but apparently in the North East lobster fishing is more important to them than the safety of the maritime public in their waters.
I finally bought a set of spurs and ignore them now, hopefully costing the lobstermen a pretty piece of change every time I hit one and cut their trap line.

Every time you see a trap in a marked navigatable channel, call the CG on VHF channel 16 and raise a ruckus. Also, call them by phone and make a formal report/complaint. Maybe if enough folks complain, they'll stop hassling boaters over minor details and get off their lazy a$$es and do something that will really help improve the safety of boaters in these waters!

Are you sure that the Coast Guard is responsible? I believe the Army Corps of Engineers are responsible.
 
Are you sure that the Coast Guard is responsible? I believe the Army Corps of Engineers are responsible.
Yes, I am positive that the CG is responsible for ensuring that the channels the CoE dredge are kept clear of obstacles such as pot buoys and the like. They are also responsible for maintaining the buoys that mark the channels. I'm sure you've seen the USCG buoy tenders at work somewhere, and the buoys stacked on their bases.

CoE has no punitive or enforcement section.
 
Are you sure that the Coast Guard is responsible? I believe the Army Corps of Engineers are responsible.

I think the ACOE is responsible for actually clearing debris while the USCG collects the info, transmits the info and marks the obstruction as need be..

Not sure what is considered within their mission scope beyond classic debris.

When I was in, if people called the USCG , we referred then to Fish and Game who control the fishery.

Seems like most laws are state.....havent found any federal regs prohibiting traps in channels.
 
Last edited:
Pots are very thick everywhere in Maine waters. This is not going to change. (As long as there are commercial quantities of lobster. Which is another subject).

As seasonal, recreational boaters with commercial lobstering friends and neighbors, we've learned to adapt. A prop cage makes seasonal boating enjoyable for us.

(A line cutter helps too. But the fisherman don't like those. Supposedly. Quite a few have them on their own boats).
 
Last edited:
I was a West Coast commercial fisherman, but never a pot fisherman. They put their pots where they have had success in the past. If someone does good in the middle of the channel, and word gets out, then the channel will be full of pots unless it's illegal.
I'd suggest getting a copy of the commercial and sport lobster regulations and see what they say as far as blocking the channel. If the buoys are cheap, homemade, not numbered, then they're probably sport fishermen. If they are illegally placed, I'd call the USCG and go from there.

Watch out for lines. Usually pot lines are polypropylene that floats. The line is usually much longer than needed to reach the fishing depth and the rest floats at or near the surface and can be difficult to see. I've got crab pot lines in my wheel a couple times by getting too close to a buoy. Usually at night.
 
In the UK at the moment there is a campaign going on about this very problem of unmarked fishing gear. If you encounter one of these in the dark, it can be very expensive and life-threatening. The Cruising Association and the RYA in the UK are involved in this campaiign and are asking for all instances of such encounters to be reported. Perhaps in the States you can start a similar action if you have a single source of yachting association?
 
Wow, great video of the problem! Something must be done about this or even the lobster boats won’t be able to operate.
We have crab traps in Florida but nothing like that.
 
Your right to navigate does NOT supersede the rights of fishing. In many places there is no law about where fishing gear may be placed. Bad-mouthing the CG and the fishermen based on your own pre-conceived notions does nothing to help the problem.

You need to keep a proper lookout. It's right there in the Nav Rules, both international and inland. People from Maine learn never to take their eyes off the water. In many areas autopilots are useless. You simply have to do your job as lookout and helmsman. Constantly. If you don't enjoy that, I'd suggest taking up another hobby, or staying in waters where you're comfortable.

Note that I'm NOT saying the lobstermen are always right, only that they have a right to earn a living. Yesterday I saw (and managed to avoid) two buoys which were floating just below the surface. And this at a minus 1' tide. Stupid!

Then there are the morons who fish with toggles on the buoy line. They are clearly just blindly following the local tradition without any clue as to why, or even how toggles are supposed to work. Stretching 20-30 feet of line horizontally just below the surface can never be justified.

But even so, I try to enjoy my time on the water, and let those who earn a living out there do their job. I always wave when I pass them at work, and often get a friendly wave back from them. And sometimes, they even use all five fingers.
 
Hi,
I find it interesting that in three pages of comments, the virulent
negative comments about lobster pot density in Maine seem to come from those who don't live here. As one who does, pots are just another challenge, like fog, the tides, the weather and all the other factors we have no control over. There is a system to most pot fields. Here in Casco Bay, fisherman fish multi pot trawls, with a buoy at each end. The trawls are generally laid in a SW/NE orientation, to minimize interference between fisherman. Thus, usually there are 'lanes' within the field that permit easier passage. Keep looking out the window and you can discern the pattern. Toggles are a different story, but they are generally in Penobscot Bay and east. That said, autopilots are pretty useless in waters less than 200', and travel at night inshore is something to avoid. In over 40 years of cruising Maine, we have snagged one pot that required swimming to untangle. That was during a light air sailboat race when the current swept us onto the buoy. As an aside, I would be careful attempting to move or cut a pot. There is almost always a fisherman within visual range, and they have long memories. More than one boat has gone adrift at night under unusual circumstance.

So, come to Maine, enjoy the wonderful cruising and friendly inhabitants, and respect to coast for what it is. Under today's pressures, the lobster fishery may not last forever.

Roger
 
I believe that there are laws prohibiting hauling someone else's gear. I would not condone touching someone's gear (even to move it) nor purposely destroying someone's fishing gear. I also can't condone illegally causing damage to someone's boat in retribution. Let's take that nonsense off the table.

I believe that everyone has the right to equally enjoy the waters as well as make a living. I have no problem with lobster pots. We have plenty and we are used to making our way through them.

My only question or comment for discussion is whether they belong inside of a marked channel in between markers.
 
My only question or comment for discussion is whether they belong inside of a marked channel in between markers.

They belong wherever the lobsters are. At least around here.

Maybe it's different elsewhere. Has anyone seen a state-wide or federal regulation which prohibits it? There are individual areas with such rules, like in a canal, but I'm curious if any state has written a blanket rule for all channels.
 
Back
Top Bottom