Show Us Your Fuel Valves

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

menzies

Guru
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
7,233
Location
USA
Vessel Name
SONAS
Vessel Make
Grand Alaskan 53
When I first took a look at this set up I thought "Holy Moly, how am I going to work all of this out," this is extremely complex.

But when I sat back and read the labeling (which is well done), it is all very clear and well laid out.

Anyone else with a "seemingly" complicated set up?
 

Attachments

  • P1018045.jpg
    P1018045.jpg
    139.2 KB · Views: 162
Wow! That's my fists reaction.

Question though. How many tanks are in the system? Two engines plus a generator? We're getting ready to redo ours so this is a timely thread.
 
How are the labels attached?
 
Smitty, that's nice and simple. You can see you have the starboard engine and gen running from and back to the starboard tank and the port to and from the port tank.

Do you have any way of balancing the tanks, or do you just put more fuel into the starboard tank?
 
"Do you have any way of balancing the tanks, or do you just put more fuel into the starboard tank?"

These manifolds were the same on my last 3 boats so we got pretty used to them.
Often balanced by just putting a bit more fuel in the tank used by the genset.
Or we just rotated the selection of the genset tank as the valves were very handy to access - 20 hours or so port then 20 hours or so stb.
Or if we had a tank imbalance just temporarily set both engines to return fuel to the lower tank until even then set them back to individual tank returns.
Notably - the mains burned very near equal amounts over 10+ seasons as we used boost gages to syn engines at anything over hull speed.
 
my system is so simple it does not require any valves except for a shut off for each engine/generator.

Two engine, two tanks.

One fuel pump to move fuel in either direction if need be (which is almost never).

No single point of failure.

Simple, and extremely reliable.

I've had boats with forward and reverse valves, and this one took me by suprise until I examined it closely. It is a marvel of simplicity, yet still providing the ability to balance fuel load.
 
Last edited:
my system is so simple it does not require any valves except for a shut off for each engine/generator.

Two engine, two tanks.

One fuel pump to move fuel in either direction if need be (which is never).

No single point of failure.

Simple, and extremely reliable.

Diesels or gas?
 
Here are a couple of photos. The first one with red lines in the flow coming from the tanks and going to the engines. With a transfer line. The second one with yellow lines are the return flows coming back from the engines to the tanks, with a transfer line.

Three tanks, Starboard, Port and Forward.

Tags are on there with cable ties.
 

Attachments

  • P1000919.jpg
    P1000919.jpg
    104.8 KB · Views: 75
  • P1000920.jpg
    P1000920.jpg
    92.7 KB · Views: 81
Diesels or gas?

Diesel engines (of course) :rolleyes: :)

I have 600+ of safe range at hull speed.

What makes this system possible is my two engine, two tank setup.

Each tank is 220 gallons, so 440 gallons total.

If I had a single screw boast, or more than two tanks valving would of course be required.

For a boat with two tanks, and twin engines I see no logical reason to make things more complex than necessary for reliable operation.

As a interesting note the photos that Ron (smitty) posted are of the way the valves were arranged on this same model boat of previous model years. At some point the Bayliner engineering team figured out that it was unnecessary and went with a simpler system.
 
Last edited:
Diesel engines (of course) :rolleyes: :)

I have 600+ of safe range at hull speed.

So don't you have valves controlling where you want your fuel to be taken from and returned to? Or is it fixed that it feeds and returns to that same tank for each engine?
 
So don't you have valves controlling where you want your fuel to be taken from and returned to? Or is it fixed that it feeds and returns to that same tank for each engine?

Port engine feeds from and returns to port tank
Starboard engine feeds from and returns to starboard tank
Generator feeds from and returns to Starboard tank

There is a reversing fuel pump between the two tanks that can transfer fuel in either direction.
 
Greetings,
Similar to Mr. ks. 3 tanks, 3 valves (each engine+genny). All tanks are amidships in the keel connected by 2 valves. No transfer pump(s). Simple, easy-peasy.
 
This is the new system installed with the engine and gen set upgrade The oil exchange system is up top there are feeds for the furnace, gen set and engines as well as the returns. THe photo doesn't show it well but everything is clearly labeled
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0559.jpg
    IMG_0559.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
Easy and elegant. Just lie on your side and it gets even easier.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 96
Easy and elegant. Just lie on your side and it gets even easier.

So you have to draw from both tanks at all times?

What is the valve bottom left for?
 
So you have to draw from both tanks at all times?

What is the valve bottom left for?

No, I can draw from either tank or both. If you look carefully at the diagram, you'll see that eack tank has a shut off at the tank itself. Both tanks feed the supply manifold. If you close the valve at the tank, only the other tank feeds the supply manifold.

The valve at the bottom left is the starboard engine supply.
 
Menzies, the photo is sideways and needs to be rotated clockwise. I think the valve you are referring to is the one in the shadows. That valve, if the picture was rotated would be on the upper left. It is the return line to the starboard tank.
 
Replumbed my system during the refit. It's very simple. Engine and generator both draw off the starboard tank and each has their own shutoff valve and Racor separator. By practice, all fuel is pumped into the port tank. You could fill the starboard tank in an emergency. Fuel is transferred to the starboard tank through the fuel polisher. Plumbing is such that fuel can be transferred to either tank. Either tank can be polished. If the transfer pump fails, both suction valves can be opened to equalize the tanks by gravity.

Each tank hold over 300 gallons for a total range of over 2,000 miles.


What it looked like before I started:

DSCN0764.jpg

DSCN0765.jpg

DSCN0776.jpg

My transfer / polishing system:

DSCN1751.jpg

DSCN1757.jpg

Ted
 
Interesting. Also neat how one is labeled "Sunction," I have not seen that before.

That picture of your Racor filter and filter valve does raise another question for me though.

When I got the boat the valve for the duty and standby was set to both. For now I have left it that way.

Last weekend on a trip with other boaters I raised the question. My thought being you should really run through the duty and if you have an issue there switch to the standby while your replace the duty. That way bad fuel will not take the engine down. He told me that his filters are also set to both at the advice of his mechanic.

I don't get it. I am having the Lugger guy come before the end of the year to do the annual and this is YET another question I have!

It could be that while in US waters, where fuel is more reliable, you get longer between filter changes, watch your filter pressure gauge, and then change both at the same time.

But not sure that is the best way all the same.
 

Attachments

  • P1000921.JPG
    P1000921.JPG
    157.9 KB · Views: 51
I always run on one filter keeping the other as standby. I think running on both defeats the redundancy of the system.
 
Interesting. Also neat how one is labeled "Sunction," I have not seen that before.

That picture of your Racor filter and filter valve does raise another question for me though.

When I got the boat the valve for the duty and standby was set to both. For now I have left it that way.

Last weekend on a trip with other boaters I raised the question. My thought being you should really run through the duty and if you have an issue there switch to the standby while your replace the duty. That way bad fuel will not take the engine down. He told me that his filters are also set to both at the advice of his mechanic.

I don't get it. I am having the Lugger guy come before the end of the year to do the annual and this is YET another question I have!

It could be that while in US waters, where fuel is more reliable, you get longer between filter changes, watch your filter pressure gauge, and then change both at the same time.

But not sure that is the best way all the same.

I have the same system for my propulsion engine. Running on both makes no sense. If you run on both and develop a clogged filter, they're both clogged. I run on one, so that I'm able to switch to a clean filter in an emergency. The Racor 1,000 is rated for 180 GPH per filter, so flow shouldn't be an issue.

Ted
 
Last edited:
When I first took a look at this set up I thought "Holy Moly, how am I going to work all of this out," this is extremely complex.

But when I sat back and read the labeling (which is well done), it is all very clear and well laid out.

Anyone else with a "seemingly" complicated set up?

I like the labeling with plastic ties. In some applications could imagine they could be inadvertently pulled off. For this usage I think it would be preferred.

Mark
 
Here are a couple of photos. The first one with red lines in the flow coming from the tanks and going to the engines. With a transfer line. The second one with yellow lines are the return flows coming back from the engines to the tanks, with a transfer line.

Three tanks, Starboard, Port and Forward.

Tags are on there with cable ties.


What I've done as a backup is to put label maker labels on the valve handles. Just in case a tag "disappears". :D
 
No pics. But PO used 3 way valves. Open l, open R , both. And they are on both supply and return of port and STBD tank. I can take from either side, or both and return to either side , or both. What seems to happen in practice though more returns to STBD side when open both. So I run off one side for a month. (Returning to same side). Then Switch to other side to even out.

This is valve type. http://www.westmarine.com/buy/sierra--valve-3-way-1-4-fnpt-universal--14605281
 
Last edited:
On my 4588 I too have the main fuel board that others have posted. Here is an excerpt from my Out-A-Sight user manual.
 

Attachments

  • Priming Fuel Filters.pdf
    563.5 KB · Views: 49
I have the same system for my propulsion engine. Running on both makes no sense. If you run on both and develop a clogged filter, they're both clogged. I run on one, so that I'm able to switch to a clean filter in an emergency. The Racor 1,000 is rated for 180 GPH per filter, so flow shouldn't be an issue.

Ted

I have heard this discussion multiple times - whether to run on one racor and have a second as a hot standby or run on both.

A friend who I respect very much subscribes to the increased filter area of running on both. Clogs wont happen as fast, regular changes of filters before they get totally clogged.

I subscribe to the run on one, and have a hot standby approach. My experience has been a lot of times the clogging of a filter can come on pretty fast. Once I know I have an issue - I can switch over to a clean filter and have that engine available for a period of time to position the boat to a location where I want it to be when I change the filter. It's no fun sitting in rolling seas, one engine trying to maintain steerage while you have to change out filters.

Mark
 
"A friend who I respect very much subscribes to the increased filter area of running on both. Clogs wont happen as fast, regular changes of filters before they get totally clogged"

If this is the goal then add a bulk filter up line with a separate vac gage to achieve the longest filter life. Utilizing two finer filters in parallel to achieve that goal is not the best use of hardware or money.
 
I have heard this discussion multiple times - whether to run on one racor and have a second as a hot standby or run on both.

A friend who I respect very much subscribes to the increased filter area of running on both. Clogs wont happen as fast, regular changes of filters before they get totally clogged.

I subscribe to the run on one, and have a hot standby approach. My experience has been a lot of times the clogging of a filter can come on pretty fast. Once I know I have an issue - I can switch over to a clean filter and have that engine available for a period of time to position the boat to a location where I want it to be when I change the filter. It's no fun sitting in rolling seas, one engine trying to maintain steerage while you have to change out filters.

Mark

Vacuum gauge:
If you're going to invest this kind of money in a dual separator system, it's crazy not to have a vacuum gauge at the helm to warn you of a fouling filter. Unless the separator is undersized, you have lots of time (probably hours) to switch filters, from when you first start seeing a rise in vacuum.

Left one is engine. Right one is fuel polisher.

DSCN1340.jpg

Ted
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom