I understand adjudication of the percent of blame but how does that translate to resolving the monetary claims.
For example if the larger boat with 60% of blame had $50K of damages and the smaller destroyed boat with 40% of blame was valued at $30K, does that mean the smaller boat is responsible for $20K of the damages to the larger boat and $12K for the damages to his own boat?
Or is the larger boat responsible for for all $80K of the damages because he was assigned the majority of the blame?
|