Mandatory Dye Tablets for Your Black tank??

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Greetings,
Mr. D. Good post. "...but apparently some need the reminder" EXACTLY! You can't fix stupid but you can make it costly enough to perhaps think, even out of fear. As has been mentioned, the "smart" boors dump at night when, given enough time, any dyes and waste will have dissipated. That's why I'm advocating fluorescent/luminescent dyes if there is such a thing. I'm thinking it would be a great source of amusement those responsible boaters when the "perp" gets hung out to dry. I know I'd enjoy it.
 
make enough noise about the issue...which is not good but debatably a problem all things considered except good taste...and the non boaters will require radioactive tablets so no one can hide their dumping...:socool:

be careful what you wish for...:eek:

we have all seen it way too much...often the political solution becomes a bigger issue than the problem.
 
You can't fix stupid but you can make it costly enough to perhaps think, even out of fear.

Actually, in a way, you can fix stupid; through training and education.

Mandatory courses for the privilege of owning or operating a boat might go a long way in creating a more civilized boating society.

Set an expectation of what is proper and why it is proper, instead of a trying to avoid a fine from them damn guys in the gubberment.
 
I always love broad statements like these!... who says the earth is overpopulated? .. who set the number? Are most populations going up.. sure.. It has been that way through most of history.

Not to beat you up too bad on this Art, but if you feel so strongly about this should you not be on a sailboat vs. a greenhouse gas, earth killing powerboat?

There are so many groups that try to stop so called "man made" environmental issues .. the one thta gets to me on a daily basis is "man made" erosion here in the PNW... we now have to build back further from the bluff front waterfront so we don't cause bluff erosion.. the irony is that ALL of Puget Sound is a erosion area that started a bazillion years ago after the last ice age (which I am sure some some enviro group blames on the few humans that were here then!)

On a side note, I am a TOTAL ADVOCATE of some of the things we do to protect the environment.. I recycle all plastics, don't dump used oil, don't drive old beater polluting cars.. don't pump oily bilge water.. These all make sense

HOLLYWOOD

Thank you!!!

Humans are just as much a part of nature ans any other species.
 
To see the effects of raw sewage, and of humans, look no further than my home state of North Carolina, the largest producer of hogs in the country. In 1995, 25 million gallons of hog waste spilled into the New River (upriver from Camp Lejeune and Sneads Ferry). 10-15 miles of the New River became pretty much lifeless, plant and fish, pretty massive fish kills, couldn't take oysters around Sneads Ferry for two seasons.. The farm owner had no permits or anything. He was fined and hit for clean up costs in the grand total of $104,000. In one county in NC, Duplin, hogs produce more waste than the NYC sewage system! The industry fights any regulation at all and is pretty successful at having little to no meaningful regulation at the federal and state levels.

The big guys can defeat attempts at regulation and our industry, who is, at best, such a minuscule piece of the problem as to have virtually no effect, bear the brunt of political "feel-good" regulation.

Make no mistake, I am in favor on not dumping, pretty much at all, anywhere, except well at sea. But I would like to see the feds and states put as much effort into solving the real, material issues causing the problem and not use the recreational boating industry as a scapegoat.
 
I always love broad statements like these!... who says the earth is overpopulated? .. who set the number? Are most populations going up.. sure.. It has been that way through most of history.

Not to beat you up too bad on this Art, but if you feel so strongly about this should you not be on a sailboat vs. a greenhouse gas, earth killing powerboat?

There are so many groups that try to stop so called "man made" environmental issues .. the one thta gets to me on a daily basis is "man made" erosion here in the PNW... we now have to build back further from the bluff front waterfront so we don't cause bluff erosion.. the irony is that ALL of Puget Sound is a erosion area that started a bazillion years ago after the last ice age (which I am sure some some enviro group blames on the few humans that were here then!)

On a side note, I am a TOTAL ADVOCATE of some of the things we do to protect the environment.. I recycle all plastics, don't dump used oil, don't drive old beater polluting cars.. don't pump oily bilge water.. These all make sense

HOLLYWOOD

HOLLYWOOD: Thanks for your consideration!

Worry not; you can't beat me up on this – I stand firm, i.e. Truth is Truth! And, I also do not mean to nor want to beat you up on this either!!

But - - > This global situation is as it is... and... This is how I see it:

Those who think global scale life support operations will remain in OK conditions throughout this eco-systemic planet earth, in reference to occurred, ongoing, and worsening ecosystemic caused debilitations via severely incorrect anthropogenic actions, have blinders on.

Portions of or the entirety of atmosphere, oceans, many lakes and rivers are approaching tipping points (e.g. disastrous alterations in their general composition and life support systems) ... they are entering untenable and potentially unsolvable interactive groups of crisis levels.

It is up to humans only to abate, resolve, redirect, improve upon, filter, or stop our anthropogenic actions that will too soon (probably before close of 21st Century) change this world’s ecosystem into states of worse than livable conditions.

This Global Clean-Up Agenda can create and establish enormously profitable industries and new businesses, with new employment opportunities throughout many world sections.

There’s nothing wrong with being green – and – there can become oodles of profit in it too! :thumb:

Happy Life Daze! - Art :D
 
Last edited:
I would like to ask some questions to those who dump at the three mile zone, If you have easy access to a pump out station, why do you pump at sea ? is it because you can ? is it because you are lazy ? Is it because you don't care ? I am no tree hugger, pump out seems to be the right choice when available.
 
For what it's worth, the SF estuarian waters are much cleaner (but saltier) now than fifty years ago.

img_238769_0_f83fd25823a2743dc0bbcaf4c683633f.jpg


(Harbor seal under seagull attack.)
 
Last edited:
I would like to ask some questions to those who dump at the three mile zone, If you have easy access to a pump out station, why do you pump at sea ? is it because you can ? is it because you are lazy ? Is it because you don't care ? I am no tree hugger, pump out seems to be the right choice when available.

the same laws that say you cannot pump inside the three my limits says that you can pump outside the limit. apparently somebody in our wise government figured out that dumping 30 gallons of poo outside in three mile limit isn't any big deal. if you go 3 miles off the coast of California the next to dirt is 5000 miles to the west... the Pacific is a big body of water it can handle it. it's all about a question of density ....inside a small bay dumping untreated sewage is a really bad idea of the ocean it's not an issue.
In the 20,000 + miles of offshore voyaging I've done I don't know anybody that goes out there it doesn't dump their holding tank.
Hollywood
 
I'm OK dumping a few bits if macerated poop once a year when I know the cruise ship that just passed me dumped a tad more on its 20th trip to Alaska this summer...

The only time we've had any high e coli counts was when our local waste treatment facility backed up several years ago.

The ocean is big. Deep too.
 
I would like to ask some questions to those who dump at the three mile zone, If you have easy access to a pump out station, why do you pump at sea ? is it because you can ? is it because you are lazy ? Is it because you don't care ? I am no tree hugger, pump out seems to be the right choice when available.

We have MSD's so macerate and treat our sewage prior to disposing. So it's none of your answers above. We save others having to process and transfer our sewage. And we help not overburden the pump out stations. Otherwise we have never dumped out waste.
 
... And we help not overburden the pump out stations. ...

Have yet to see pump-out stations being overworked.
 
Have yet to see pump-out stations being overworked.

You haven't seen some of the small ones at some marinas on the East Coast. In some areas there is still a shortage of stations and the equipment in use is undersized. Also some marinas only have pump out at the fuel pumps and have limited dock space there.

Still, I answered the question. We use pump out if in a harbor, we use MSD when outside three miles. Our MSD meets all US and IMO MEPC standards. We are putting treated sewage in the water just as municipalities do. Even though in most areas it is legal for us to discharge close to shore, we choose not to both as a courtesy to other boaters and because an observer doesn't know it's treated.
 
I've yet to boat in California. That doesn't happen until later this year. ...

Will you pass through THE CANAL? It's a wondrous engineering feat.

232323232%7Ffp83232%3Euqcshlukaxroqdfv846%3C%3Dot%3E2454%3D42%3B%3D66%3C%3DXROQDF%3E2%3B5388%3A37%3C245ot1lsi
 
Will you pass through THE CANAL? It's a wondrous engineering feat.

Yes, we will. Probably be on the west coast until January or so and then head south toward the canal. At the moment in Washington and headed to Alaska within a week. After Alaska, a week or so visiting Victoria and Vancouver. Then back down the coast, a short trip to Portland. A couple of intermediate trips home, then head through Oregon for some time in California. Visiting a lot of areas we've never visited by land or water. Well, unless you count flying through airports. Not just a few new states but some new countries for us too.

Yes, Canal not only a wondrous feat but the only decent way to get home too.
 
Will you pass through THE CANAL? It's a wondrous engineering feat.


BUT does it have pump out stations?
 
I guess it's all about perception of what sewage is all about.

Some people here think that using the pump out station is so gross they hardly do it themselves.

There's other people like me who probably just roll up their sleeves, grab a screwdriver to change a sewage line macercator without a second thought.

Some people don't even like public bathrooms and others are comfortable digging and filling a camp slit trench.

Of all the things that make it into the ocean...especially municiplal sewage and all the stuff people flush down toilets...what comes out of boats doesn't bother me in the slightest.

As long as people follow the three mile rule and use type I or II treatment inside of that. I could care less.

I even think there are many NDZs that should go back to allowing type I and II treatment, like most of Coastal North Carolina (maybe certain spots should stay but much of it is flushed well enough by tides)

I'm not sure some people here realize how few pumpot stations there are in some parts of the ACIW. Heck, leave Savannah southbound and there's a only a couple marinas for almost 80 miles sprinkled about and many are more fish camp than marina. Finding a working pumpout can be a chore and then finding it manned or someone on duty that knows how to use it. There are marinas with "slip holder only" policies. There are marinas that charge pretty high rates such as $1/gallon.

So for some going out to the three mile line isn't necessarily lazy...it's a must if they don't want to dump illegally. Only until two summers ago was there a working and usually available pumpout within 10 miles of my marina in southern NJ and it's a huge boating area.
 
Last edited:
...

The big guys can defeat attempts at regulation and our industry, who is, at best, such a minuscule piece of the problem as to have virtually no effect, bear the brunt of political "feel-good" regulation.

Make no mistake, I am in favor on not dumping, pretty much at all, anywhere, except well at sea. But I would like to see the feds and states put as much effort into solving the real, material issues causing the problem and not use the recreational boating industry as a scapegoat.

Very well said.

We are rapidly becoming a country, even world, of feel good regulation.

Just look at fishing and TSA to name a few caused by ever more pandering politicians.

No wonder some just want to get on their boat and go around the world.
 
I would like to ask some questions to those who dump at the three mile zone, If you have easy access to a pump out station, why do you pump at sea ? is it because you can ? is it because you are lazy ? Is it because you don't care ? I am no tree hugger, pump out seems to be the right choice when available.

Why do we pump out at sea? Because we do it when we are already there!
 
For what it's worth, the SF estuarian waters are much cleaner (but saltier) now than fifty years ago.

img_238811_0_f83fd25823a2743dc0bbcaf4c683633f.jpg


(Harbor seal under seagull attack.)

Right on Mark!

Back when I was a teenager, I worked for Save The Bay. Like the Chesapeake (which has it's own Save The Bay), it was on the verge of being a dead zone. So many waters now taken for granted would be dead sewers today if not for the efforts of those who saw the future and acted on it.
 
I would like to ask some questions to those who dump at the three mile zone, If you have easy access to a pump out station, why do you pump at sea ? is it because you can ? is it because you are lazy ? Is it because you don't care ? I am no tree hugger, pump out seems to be the right choice when available.
Most regulations are scatter shot when the target is usually more specific. Point source pollution is a good way to kill a restricted waterway - municipal dumping, agricultural waste, leaking septic tanks, etc. I include morons who dump into marinas, since the amount of water and the potential concentration within the marina start to resemble point source pollution.

However, boaters dumping their waste into deep(ish) water subject to tidal flows willy nilly as they move around is not only not harmful but if the e coli is killed through extremely simple and economical systems is definitely beneficial. As far as I'm concerned, I could care less what boater dumps his potty around my waters, as long as it is away from shore - 3 mile or otherwise. The eco-system thanks that boater whenever it happens.

And on the subject of poo, a paper published a few years ago proposed that if the whale population increased to pre-hunting levels, it would take a significant whack out of atmospheric CO2 - another source of pollution I am profoundly indifferent to - but if you are inclined to give a rip, the reason whales equal lower CO2 is because their VW Beetle size floaters so stimulate the ecosystem that carbon fixing critters absorb more of the stuff than otherwise, what with the banquet available each time a whale pinches a loaf.

Lots of things to worry about in this world, but boaters feeding the fish while underway is not one of them.
 
We have MSD's so macerate and treat our sewage prior to disposing. So it's none of your answers above. We save others having to process and transfer our sewage. And we help not overburden the pump out stations. Otherwise we have never dumped out waste.

That's our solution as well.
 
OK , like I said I have no problem for those who have no access to pump out stations or on a trip where just to come in and dump is very costly but enter or leave and have access and not utilize one is lazy. To say you are feeding the eco system. . . . what did this world do before your pooo ? Will a drop a day in a Olympic size pool ever show up ? Maybe several thousand gallons a day will show up in the ocean, maybe not in your life time but who's your kids, grand-kids or great grand kids ?
 
I’m no purest and believe (except for mandated NDZ’s) that properly treated sewage should be OK for release in waterways that consistently experience good tidal flow with at least relatively strong current for portion of the flow... but... not untreated raw sewage released anywhere except into a pump-out facility or 3 miles + off shore. I also feel (as long as equipment is available on board) it is thoughtful and wise to properly treat sewage before releasing into 3 mile waters. That simply makes sense for added protection of shore line sea life and swimmers.

Following are quotes from: CA SF Bay Delta’s San Joaquin and Sacramento River Pumpout Map & Guide (dated 2005/2006, but still relevant)
http://www.pumpoutstations.com/sacramento_pumpout_stations.htm

- As of 2004, there were 232,297 registered boats in the Bay-Delta region and nearly one million statewide — enough to make a sizable impact on water quality. [My input: I notice many “live aboard” boats that never get new registration stickers affixed. Wonder if they are counted as registered. And, you know the chances of their having treated sewage release... not good!)

- While the amount of sewage pollution contributed by boaters isn't enormous, it does impact the health of human water users and the Bay-Delta ecosystem. Swimmers, windsurfers or boaters who come in contact with raw sewage can get stomach aches, diarrhea, skin rashes, hepatitis and even typhoid or cholera.

- Diners with a taste for raw clams, oysters or mussels face some of the same perils if the shellfish have been contaminated with sewage. Fish can die when the biological processes that break down sewage steal too much oxygen from their waters.

THE POOP

1. A weekend boater flushing untreated sewage into the Bay produces the same amount of bacterial pollution as that of 10,000 people whose sewage passes through a treatment plant.

2. Studies have found elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria — a commonly used indicator for measuring the presence of feces in water — where there are concentrations of recreational boaters.

3. Over 100 different intestinal pathogens — viruses, parasites and bacteria — can be found in sewage.

4. Fecal coliform counts dropped from 16,000 per 100 ml to 23 per 100 ml in California's Avalon Harbor after the harbor launched a boater education and clean water program. As part of the program, dye tablets are deposited in on-board toilets, making illegal discharges highly visible.

5. Synthetic hormones (from birth control pills and hormone therapy) secreted via women's urine into waterways can be absorbed by fish, causing physiological changes and affecting the reproductive ability of male fish. Antibiotics and other drugs taken by humans are also turning up in the nation’s waterways.


I’m not trying to pass judgment on anyone... Just saying that boating sewage, like all sewage, needs to be handled thoughtfully for all concerned so as to keep our waters and sea life pristine as possible. Untreated sewage released from boats, especially in sedentary, confined areas is a true bummer! I recommend... just think clearly (e.g. cleanly) about sewage ramifications before dumping... and... if possible clear your black tanks by pumping!

Happy Clean-Water Boating Daze! - Art
:speed boat:
 
Last edited:
OK , like I said I have no problem for those who have no access to pump out stations or on a trip where just to come in and dump is very costly but enter or leave and have access and not utilize one is lazy. To say you are feeding the eco system. . . . what did this world do before your pooo ? Will a drop a day in a Olympic size pool ever show up ? Maybe several thousand gallons a day will show up in the ocean, maybe not in your life time but who's your kids, grand-kids or great grand kids ?
Oh, it will all show up, or at least thermodynamics says so. My poo, your poo, everyone's poo will provide a return of a portion of what we consumed in life to the benefit of a number of organisms beyond number, never mind what feeds on those critters. The idea that biologic processes that have been going on for eons and on which life itself is dependent are intrinsically bad when human sourced is one of the odder lunacies of eco-fanatics. Concentrate waste in one spot in the water and kill life. Distribute it and create new life.

What's so complicated about that?
 
OK , like I said I have no problem for those who have no access to pump out stations or on a trip where just to come in and dump is very costly but enter or leave and have access and not utilize one is lazy. To say you are feeding the eco system. . . . what did this world do before your pooo ? Will a drop a day in a Olympic size pool ever show up ? Maybe several thousand gallons a day will show up in the ocean, maybe not in your life time but who's your kids, grand-kids or great grand kids ?

My poo is no different than any other animals poo

Humans are not an invasive species!

We are just as much a part of nature as any other animal!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom