Merged:Northern Yacht/Oops

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
The details we have no idea. Were there warning signs? It would appear so. Were there complicating factors? We don't know.

However, it's not uncommon at all for manufacturers who are experiencing financial problems to take short cuts or rush things. It happens. When it's a tshirt manufacturer you just see poorly made shirts. When it's a Chinese pet treats manufacturer, it leads to dead cats and dogs. When it's a boat builder, this it the kind of thing that happens. There was obviously pressure to get that boat launched.
 
Stuff happens:

And yes, SNCF is 100% French government owned company.

123.png


The French train operator SNCF has discovered that 2,000 new trains it ordered at a cost of 15bn euros ($20.5bn; £12.1bn) are too wide for many regional platforms.

The BBC's Christian Fraser in Paris says that it is an embarrassing blunder that has so far cost the rail operator over 50m euros ($68.4m; £40.6m).



Construction work has already started to reconfigure station platforms.

The work will allow new trains room to pass through. But officials say that there are still 1,000 platforms to be adjusted.


The error seems to have happened because the national rail operator RFF gave the wrong dimensions to train company SNCF.

Our correspondent says that they measured platforms built less than 30 years ago, overlooking the fact that many of France's regional platforms were built more than 50 years ago when trains were a little slimmer.

The platform edges are too close to the tracks in some stations which means the trains cannot get in, officials say.

BBC News - French red faces over trains that are 'too wide'
Don't really see what the problem is. Just get up a good head of steam, tell everybody to stand back and let 'er rip. Problem solved.
 
Don't really see what the problem is. Just get up a good head of steam, tell everybody to stand back and let 'er rip. Problem solved.

Actually just make one even slightly wider than these. Make it sturdy and out of steel. Drive it through as many times as required. Then you'll have space for the others....lol.
 
Since the vessel can't stay upright without external assistance, this is now officially in von Hindenberg/Titanic/Tacoma Narrows fiasco land. Speculation on faulty launch technique, open ER doors, etc. don't mean much if the thing can't stay upright after launch with presumably all doors closed.

The question for me is how does one spend that many years and $ building a boat without anyone of the scores of people involved figuring out that it isn't a boat at all, just a very luxurious break water in the making? Clearly she's under ballasted, but how does that happen? Most of the ballast is fixed in the form of engines, batteries and presumably lead so how do you get so far off the calculations that she can't stay upright in a mill pond? I feel for all the people involved, but this should be studied as an example of just how effed up a project can get without anybody noticing until the Holy Sheet moment.

If I didn't know better, I'd say it had to be a government project.

The USCG decided to lead the pack and turned many of it's massive projects over to civilian corporations due to the abysmal failure rate by the government...guess what????..the civilian defense contractors have been just as bad production wise probably and more costly in the long run...look up Deepwater and follow it from the beginning.
 
Stuff happens:

And yes, SNCF is 100% French government owned company.

123.png


The French train operator SNCF has discovered that 2,000 new trains it ordered at a cost of 15bn euros ($20.5bn; £12.1bn) are too wide for many regional platforms.

The BBC's Christian Fraser in Paris says that it is an embarrassing blunder that has so far cost the rail operator over 50m euros ($68.4m; £40.6m).



Construction work has already started to reconfigure station platforms.

The work will allow new trains room to pass through. But officials say that there are still 1,000 platforms to be adjusted.


The error seems to have happened because the national rail operator RFF gave the wrong dimensions to train company SNCF.

Our correspondent says that they measured platforms built less than 30 years ago, overlooking the fact that many of France's regional platforms were built more than 50 years ago when trains were a little slimmer.

The platform edges are too close to the tracks in some stations which means the trains cannot get in, officials say.

BBC News - French red faces over trains that are 'too wide'


It's the french... inventor of the Citroen :socool:

I'm sure they all scoffed at each other... grabbed a baguette and a bottle of wine.. and headed off to their mistresses to massage their "egos".

Actually I really like the french rail system.. typically they really get it right.. something we cannot do here in this fine country with Amtrak.
There is nothing much better than blasting through the French countryside at 175mph while drinking a excellent Burgundy and eating cheese.. while looking at some french hottie that looks like she is headed to Paris for a fashion show
HOLLYWOOD

wait a minute... this thread was about boats wasn't it??
 
I don't know if anyone is aware of the building process that NM uses. NM uses a "cove and bead" strip building process rather than molds, either full female molds or cold molding. This process is more commonly used for very small boats, primarily kayaks/canoes. The hull is built up of strips, fitted together similar to a tongue & groove. So far as I know, the strips are made from resin infused glass. From the appearance of the hull, it looks as if the strips are then glassed over. According to Lemieux, this method is cheaper and allows more custom hull design, cheaper. He also claim it is more environmentally friendly. Not too sure I see that one.

I would be interested in any comments from Tad on using this method for such a large boat. Are there any differences in hull weight with this rather than a traditional hull? Are there differences in weight distribution within the hull?
 
I don't know if anyone is aware of the building process that NM uses. NM uses a "cove and bead" strip building process rather than molds, either full female molds or cold molding. This process is more commonly used for very small boats, primarily kayaks/canoes. The hull is built up of strips, fitted together similar to a tongue & groove. So far as I know, the strips are made from resin infused glass. From the appearance of the hull, it looks as if the strips are then glassed over. According to Lemieux, this method is cheaper and allows more custom hull design, cheaper. He also claim it is more environmentally friendly. Not too sure I see that one.

I would be interested in any comments from Tad on using this method for such a large boat. Are there any differences in hull weight with this rather than a traditional hull? Are there differences in weight distribution within the hull?

I know nothing regarding their processes other than this from their site:

As a pioneer in the application of resin-infusion and other vacuum-assisted construction methods, Northern Marine has developed many of the composite processes currently in use throughout the yacht building industry

They mention nothing about the method you mentioned. They do however have some photos at the top of their home page that give some insight into it.

Now the one thing that was included in Roddan Engineering report was that this boat was considerably lighter for it's size than any other boats they had built. This was in their report from last summer and added a variable into the stability question.

Makes sense that it's cheaper if you're customizing. Mold pays off in multiple builds of the same boat. Obviously it allows each boat to be custom. The negative would then seem to be the opposite, failing to reap any benefits of being semi-custom. But then with their volume they've always been more custom than semi.

Very interesting post.
 
Back
Top Bottom