Swivel elbow fuel fittings

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
What Goodyear had it stock. I'll get a pix next time I'm at the boat.
Incidentally, when I replaced the fuel lines from Goodyear at about $3.50/ft CG approved, the same stuff at West Marine was $5 something a ft.
 
Tim- How long were the dip tubes compared to tank height? I've had boats that the dip tubes were a bit short and when fuel got low, aerated fuel was getting picked up. Results were much like your symptoms. Tanks must have been sloshing a good bit. Fixed by installing new tubes that went to within 1/2" of tank bottom. Some of these engines are REALLY intolerant of even a little entrained air.
 
Tim- How long were the dip tubes compared to tank height?

I don't remember how long the dip tubes are because I took them out 2 years ago. But I seem to remember they were about half inch from the bottom.
There is about 15 gallons left in the tank that holds 120 gallons, or about 2.5 " of fuel in the tank. I created a vacuum on that fuel line in that tank with all the valves open and the vacuum pump connected to the hose that connects to the engine. I created vacuum of about 2-3" of HG when fuel started to enter the clear plastic tube that was on the vacuum hand pump. It held vacuum for about 15 minutes before I removed the pump. This would seem to indicate no air is leaking in through the dip tube. Correct??

I always look forward to your advise on boatdiesel.
 

Attachments

  • P1040072.JPG
    P1040072.JPG
    44.6 KB · Views: 79
  • port p-u tube.JPG
    port p-u tube.JPG
    48.6 KB · Views: 75
Yea. If it held vac for 15min, pickup plumbing sounds like it is ok.

Are you sure your return fuel path is clear from engine all the way back to tanks? One boat was stalling a lot and we found anti-siphon fittings in return lines at tanks. Kept air from getting purged, among other issues.
 
Are you sure your return fuel path is clear from engine all the way back to tanks?

I have not checked the return lines. However if some restriction was in the return line or air was getting in the lines would the engine decay issue not always happen, not just when the tanks are below half full as in my case?

Do you know of any problem that would occur if I took the return line off from the engine and blew threw it with my compressor.
 
You are correct, your symptoms do not really fit the blocked return scenario. But it is easy to check. As you posted, just take return line off engine and blow back to tank.
 
Couple things I wondered about.

You tested the tank vents by blowing air. That may not show a problem. If the hoses are kinked shut , under air pressure they would open up and show good. yet not be. If they are collapsing blowing air will not give an answer.. Just be sure as that is exactly what happend to me years ago, they collapsed.

I think in another thread you said you have vacuum guages on the filters now. Telltales types? Or did you think to read them on the monitor? What do/did they read when you started having trouble last time?

Dip tubes too close to the bottom? If as the fuel weight drops maybe the tank bottom is bulging up and partly blocking the diptubes. Try cutting the dip tube ends on about a 45o - 50o angle. Blunt the sharp end. This creates a larger suction surface area resulting in less velocity [I've forgotten the specific term] right at the entry but also if the tank bottom is the problem the cut will prevent blockage.
Or put a 90o fitting on to prevent this if you can get it in.

If this is the case when the engine quits then the tank may drop from the dip tube to quickly for you to see it on your monitor unless you were watching it at the time. The telltale guages would be better for this.

Did I see that you have rigged a fuel pessure guage. That should help at the next occurence to see if pressure drops and filter vacuum remains low.
You've been fighting this for a long time. Great persistence..
 
Last edited:
Could it be that you are relying on a siphon effect with the fuel pickup at the top of the tank and no fuel pump to get the fuel to the filters? The on-engine pumps may not have enough suck to get the fuel up and out of the tank when they are depleting. If the fuel came out the bottom of the tank you would have head pressure in your favour - I suspect that you need an inline pump.
 
Just curious.... Why both the racors and the fleetguard filter? I assume there is yet another on-engine filter, or is that what the fleetguard is?

And do you have a vacuum gauge after the filters and before the engine? High vacuum would indicate a restriction as opposed to an air leak.

How the fuel level plays into this remains a mystery, but clearly it relates somehow. Do you have a way to relate the fuel level in the tank with the level of the filters, lift pump, etc? Im not sure what it will tell you, but you never know.

Are the seals new on the racors? That might be an air leak location. I know your static vacuum test suggest there are no leaks, but something is still happening so i wouldn't take any test result as 100% conclusive.

I like the idea of a temporary clear fuel hose between the filters and engine to look for bubbles. I've hear of people having success with that.

Even without an air leak, if there is enough vacuum i think entrapped air in the fuel may bubble out, but I'm not sure. High school chemistry was a log time ago, but isn't that the basis of cavitation?

As an experiment, what about running with the racor element removed?

By the way, did you say what micron filters you are using? I've heard than using 2 micron, though well intentioned, can lead to cavitation in the fuel. I''m not sure about your engine, but the cummins QSC calls for 10 micron on the external filters.

Definitely keep us posted on this. It's a real puzzler.
 
Even without an air leak, if there is enough vacuum i think entrapped air in the fuel may bubble out, but I'm not sure. High school chemistry was a log time ago, but isn't that the basis of cavitation?

It's physics, not chemistry but you are on the right path. All diesel fuel contains air and gases that will come out of solution under lowered pressure. The injection pump will cavitate when suction pressure is low. This can create the symptoms described as well as damage the pump itself if the condition is not addressed.
 
It's physics, not chemistry but you are on the right path. All diesel fuel contains air and gases that will come out of solution under lowered pressure. The injection pump will cavitate when suction pressure is low. This can create the symptoms described as well as damage the pump itself if the condition is not addressed.

For what ever reason i was taught that part in chemistry, but I don't disagree with you. What's the saying? Biology is chemistry, chemistry is physics, physics is math.
 
Couple things I wondered about.

You tested the tank vents by blowing air. That may not show a problem. If the hoses are kinked shut , under air pressure they would open up and show good. yet not be. If they are collapsing blowing air will not give an answer.. Just be sure as that is exactly what happend to me years ago, they collapsed.

I think in another thread you said you have vacuum guages on the filters now. Telltales types? Or did you think to read them on the monitor? What do/did they read when you started having trouble last time?

Dip tubes too close to the bottom? If as the fuel weight drops maybe the tank bottom is bulging up and partly blocking the diptubes. Try cutting the dip tube ends on about a 45o - 50o angle. Blunt the sharp end. This creates a larger suction surface area resulting in less velocity [I've forgotten the specific term] right at the entry but also if the tank bottom is the problem the cut will prevent blockage.
Or put a 90o fitting on to prevent this if you can get it in.

If this is the case when the engine quits then the tank may drop from the dip tube to quickly for you to see it on your monitor unless you were watching it at the time. The telltale guages would be better for this.

Did I see that you have rigged a fuel pessure guage. That should help at the next occurence to see if pressure drops and filter vacuum remains low.
You've been fighting this for a long time. Great persistence..

I've been fighting this problem since I bought the boat 3.5 years ago.

Could be the vent lines collapsing but examining them makes me think that is not the issue. They look fine and I did blow air out the aux tank vent line disconnecting it from the tank and using my compressor to blow out air. This was about 2 years ago. Also when I blew air into the tanks through the vent holes on the side of the boat the other day, the tanks filled with air and then blew out when I removed the compressor hose. If they collapsed then I would think air would remain in the tank. An easy check would be to remove the tank fill cap next time this happens. I will do that just to make sure venting is not the issue next time this happens. But I would think a clogged vent would cause problems with fuel feed when the tanks are full as well as half full.

I ran the engines off the aux tank the other day at the dock and only just above idle. There is only about 15 gallons in the tank or about 2.5" of fuel from the bottom. The engines ran fine so if the dip tubes are too close to the bottom then perhaps it would have shown. A better test of course is to run at load at the dock. I can't really run them on the water with fuel this low because as the bow rises with only that small amount of fuel in the tank it may move to the back and uncover the dip tubes. So I will run it at load, about 1200 rpm at the dock. Anymore and my dock buddies won't be buddies anymore.

I have vacuum gauges on the racors but not tell tale types. I also have vacuum gauges just after the next set of filters, both are monitored by a camera viewed on my plotter. This is a recent setup and I have not had this failure since I installed the camera's. I also have a fuel pressure gauge installed on the port engine also monitored by a camera. This was recommended by Tony Athens on boatdiesel.

xsbank; the dip tubes go to the bottom of the tank. These Cummins engines engines don't normally need an inline fuel pump. Incidently the return lines also go to the bottom of the tank so fuel is not splashed or aerated by the return fuel.

Twistedtree; Tony Athens on boatdiesel highly recommends a multi-stage filtration system which I installed right after purchase, each filter monitored by a vacuum gauge. It just came to me but when the PO brought the boat over to the haul out facility both engines quit on the way over, and yup he had very little fuel in all the tanks. At the time we blamed it on old fuel. However changing the filiters at that time did not fix the problems, the engine had some work done on them not related to fuel. So this may have been a problem before purchase, and not caused by adding the additional filters and monkeying with the fuel system by adding a squeeze bulb priming system and changing the fuel tank selector valves, something in the back of my mind that I always considered.
Engine fuel intake is near the bottom of the engine and slightly below the filters-2ft. The tanks are the same level as the engines. I replaced the seals on both racors 1.5 years ago. If air is getting into the system at the filter the rpm decay would not be linked to the amount of fuel in the tank.
You asked: As an experiment, what about running with the racor element removed? I have bypassed everything except the on engine filter and still got the decay.

RickB, to get air bubbles out of solution (not due to an air leak) wouldn't the vacuum have to be far greater than the vacuum the pump could produce? Just trying to wrap my head around this.

One thing to think about. When we went over to the Bahamas, about half way across the rpm decay occurred on the stbd engine and I notice high vacuum. I changed the racor element and switched to the full saddle tank. Rpm came back to normal. 20 minutes later the exact same thing happened to the port engine, however this time I did not change the filter element, just switched tanks and rpm came back.
Later on that same trip rpm decay again feeding from the saddle tanks with fuel about half full. I noticed high vacuum on the FS1000 filter and changed it, rpm came back to normal for 15 minutes and the rpm decay re-occured. Upon retruning home, I cut open the FS1000 filter and posted pix of it along with the racor element on boatdiesel. Replies were that both filters looked new, not clogged and would not cause the high vacuum readings I was getting. So if I could figure out what caused these high vacuum readings, I think I would solve this problem.

I did notice the other day when running the engine at near idle from fuel from the almost empty aux tank some bubbles in the racor bowl that seemed to go away when I increased rpm.
 
Last edited:
If you saw high vac on your gauges/camera when engines stumbled, you have a restriction somewhere between gauge and bottom of pickup. Unrelated to tank level. Aerated fuel will cause vac to drop, not rise. Something floating in tank, getting caught by pickup???
 
If you saw high vac on your gauges/camera when engines stumbled, you have a restriction somewhere between gauge and bottom of pickup. Unrelated to tank level. Aerated fuel will cause vac to drop, not rise. Something floating in tank, getting caught by pickup???

Yes possible, but all three tanks, and the problem seems to only occur when the tanks are less than half full.

I'm going to put 15 gal of fuel in the aux tank which will be below half full. I'm going to run it until I get the problem again closely monitoring fuel press and vacuum.
 
Also when I blew air into the tanks through the vent holes on the side of the boat the other day, the tanks filled with air and then blew out when I removed the compressor hose. .

Be very careful doing this, most flat sided tanks will only take less than 10 psi, I think they are tested at 7 when new...
 
Rick, Very interesting article
 
Tim,
Is it possible to install another set of guages between the first filter and the tank pickup tube? Move one of your existing units to just before the first filter entry port. Then if that high vacuum shows again there is no question anymore that the problem is in the tank, vent line, the pickup tube or what I suggested.

What is that pickup tube made of?

I don't agree that blowing air proves the vent hoses are not collapasing. You proved they are not clogged, yes. Blowing will expand them and that same pressure will hold them open untill it has equalized after removing the source. Then if the hoses have any tendency to collapse from age or a kink they may still close while running. Can you see them at all? Maybe unknown to you there is a kink or the inner wall is coming apart.. That's what started my trouble. The hose had aged, gotten soft which allowed it to kink and close.

I'll repeat the warning about pressurizing the tanks. You could blow a seam.

I was really reaching when I suggested the tube end may be too close to the tank bottom but considering that you mentioned you thought something like 1/2" I had a brain =%$3 and thought that if the tank is thin enough and the bottom is not absolutely flat it could bulge up as the fuel weight released it..
Not likely but considering what you have gone through keep it in the back of your mind. It would be easy enough to trim the tubes on an angle if access is easy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom