Powercat Trawlers

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Another definition

Recreational trawlers are pleasure boats which resemble fishing trawlers. They can also be called cruising trawlers or trawler yachts. Within the category, however, are many types and styles of vessels.
A fishing trawler for example, always has a displacement hull for load-carrying capacity. Recreational trawlers, on the other hand, are as likely to have a semi-displacement hull. However, with the rising cost of fuel and the lower fuel consumption (though also lower speed) offered by displacement hulls, they are gaining popularity among some buyers. These displacement models typically have a cruising speed of 7-9 knots depending on the boat length. Their maximum speed is often no more than 10-12 knots, whereas semi-displacement hulls can attain 14-20 knots.
 
No. Several of those vessels are aimed at 8 knot cruise
Can you show me where it is written that a trawler must be slow? ...

If you really want to go by definition how do any of the vessels on this forum fit this description?

Do any of these liveaboard trawlers get used for trawling (fishing)?

Page 29 of the 66th edition of Chapman -- Piloting and Seamanship:

"Within the commercial fishing community, the word "trawler" has a specific meaning relating to a style of fishing, but in recreational boating the term is used much more loosely. In general, a cruiser that does not have sufficient horsepower to get into a planing mode is known as a TRAWLER.

"The trawler's hull is a displacement design to ride through and not over the water ... Speed is normally limited to hull speed; the engine can be either single or twins. These craft have very modest fuel consumption characteristics and are popular for traveling at speeds of 7 to 10 knots over long distances. There are available so-called "fast trawlers" capable of speeds up to 25 knots, but the term is really an oxymoron and incorrect."

My boat is capable of 7.3 knots but I usually travel at a more efficient 6.3 knots. This means leaving earlier than my friends' (who are TF members) faster boats when we're on a common journey.

Here leading my faster friends through the shallow Petaluma River (a slough); they passed me later on San Pablo Bay. We subsequently arrived at the Vallejo Marina in 10-minute intervals.

232323232%7Ffp7349%3B%3Enu%3D3363%3E33%3A%3E57%3B%3EWSNRCG%3D3955%3C476%3A8336nu0mrj


Postscript: I don't fish.
 
Last edited:
Page 29 of the 66th edition of Chapman -- Piloting and Seamanship:
One persons opinion
The trawler's hull is a displacement design to ride through and not over the water ... Speed is normally limited to hull speed; the engine can be either single or twins. These craft have very modest fuel consumption characteristics and are popular for traveling at speeds of 7 to 10 knots over long distances.
So those powercat trawlers tick all those boxes so obviously they must be a trawler
My boat is capable of 7.3 knots but I usually travel at a more efficient 6.3 knots.

SONG_SAIGON_1.jpg

Song Saigon is capable of 13.5 knots but she usually travels at a more efficient 8 knots.

attachment.php

Bamba 50 is capable of 15 knots but she would usually travel at a more efficient 8 knots. (150hp x 2)
0_3.jpg

Brady 52 is capable of about 12 knots but she would usually travel at a more efficient 8 knots. (90hp x 2)

Sherkhan_Exterior3.jpg

Sher Khan is capable of about 13 knots but she would usually travel at a more efficient 10 knots. (200hp x 2)

Seems pretty obvious to me they are all trawlers

They are displacement design
They travel at modest speed
They have modest fuel consumption
They are capable of travelling at 7 to 10 knots over long distances
 
No. While they might often travel at or less than hull speed, they are capable of moving much faster. Let's just say they can enjoy moving at trawler pace. (Love the sails on the Brady 52.)

232323232%7Ffp54367%3Enu%3D394%3A%3E7%3A9%3E559%3E2%3A3%3B7%3A964%3A245ot1lsi
 
Last edited:
No. While they might often travel at or less than hull speed, they are capable of moving much faster.
What a nonsensical argument :rolleyes:

They don't move much faster because they can't move much faster due to hull shape and engine size.

Equally as nonsensical would be to say your boat is a fast express cruiser because I could strap 10,000hp in it making it faster that your "Trawler speed" window.

If you were to cross a fast running bar in yours and all conditions being favourable, fell down the mine and you saw double figures on the log, would you now claim that it was not a trawler?

May I also remind you of the guidelines that you stipulated, which these vessels meet?
The trawler's hull is a displacement design to ride through and not over the water ... Speed is normally limited to hull speed; the engine can be either single or twins. These craft have very modest fuel consumption characteristics and are popular for traveling at speeds of 7 to 10 knots over long distances.
 
Last edited:
Real commercial trawlers are displacement vessels , linited in speed by their hull shape and weight and usually gear ratio.

As a heavy boat hull depth is no problem so a 4-1 to 6-1 gear is used and this allows a huge diameter propeller.With a target shaft speed of under 500 RPM going from 1500 to 2100 adds a huge amount of thrust , but does little for speed.

The rec trawlers are usually more a deck house style stuck on a yachty style hull.

These can be low powered or over powered as the customer desires , the game is to use the same mold for as many hulls as can be popped.

The most efficient displacement boat will have a displacement hull, round bilges .

The difference in drag can be 10-20% higher for the semi plaining boat at slow speeds , but going from 3GPH to 4 GPH at trawler crawl doesnt change the years boat bill by much.
 
There's no way to win (or loose) a debate of opinion. The standards of traditional trawlers have been so compromised that the nomenclature no longer relates to fact. Who cares. Marks boat is probably the closest to the fundamental trawler design we have on the forum. Planing hulls are probably the furthest away. In between are all the other adaptations of the design. So what.
 
WHO CARES!

Really the term we all should use is passagemaker.

Dashew doesnt call those tin cans he builds "trawlers".. they are fast pasysage makers.
Mark is dead wrong that a cat cannot be a passagemaker..we are reffering here to displacement speeds are we not.
Cats can be driven by small diesels at displacement speeds due to waterline length.
The side bonus is not needing to be stabilized.
The real bonus is space.
Hollywood
 
How does that aft mast design work? Does the staysail pull from the lower point and not equally from the mast? If equal then wouldn't that rig give you an absurd amount of weather helm?
 
Hopefully we are done with the "what defines a trawler" argument!!! We have beaten that dead horse over and over. And if you want to look at the corpse, please use the search button.

Now, I have always been cat curious. There are a lot of advantages. My only negative is the "compartmentalization" of the space. Every area is a compartment. The bigger you get, the less truth there is to that. Also in a boat like the PDQ 34, your sleeping space is no better than a small sailboat v-berth. I guess I want something a bit more comfy for $300k. BTW, I am a big fan of the PDQ. Of the Lagoon 43 as well. It seems you have to get over 50 feet before they open up in space.
 
Just Listed for Sale, 62' Powercat

This 62 Powercat that I posted at the beginning of this subject thread is owned by a friend of mine. He just informed me that he was going to sell the vessel as his treasure hunting days are limited.

Here is the listing along with photos I didn't have.
1999 Catamaran Malcolm Tenant Cat Craft Custom Pilothouse Power Boat For Sale

Bill's 62 Tennant cat.jpg
$750K...a good deal by todays std's to build a new one


I was reading thru another subject thread that had a similar title, but it appeared to have gotten way off track in its discussions.
http://www.trawlerforum.com/forums/s3/powercat-trawlers-vs-traditional-trawlers-9998.html
So I thought I might start a new subject thread.

I'll open it up with very nice trawler style 62 footer that was designed by the late Malcolm Tennant of NZ. This was a custom built boat by an owner of several previous sailing-charter cats, that now wanted a powercat for cruising the Bahamas and beyond. that owner/builder subsequently sold it to a good fried of mine who had also previously owned a large sailing cat.

aware of...several of them being production mono-hulls. But as I read my own words, I can't help but think of this wonderful vessel I just spent a few days aboard in Palm Beach. It was recently grabbed up (purchased) by a good friend of mine for his own liveaboard & treasure hunting purposes, so it is not available. I'll present a few details and photos as an example of what I consider a really nice liveaboard cruising vessel that is not too audacious while accomplishing most of what you have in mind plus a few extras...great dive and explore boat.

I'll post some pics I took while visiting a year ago. Look at the interior room available in this vessel,....and that great galley and big saloon. One master stateroom in one hull, and two guest staterooms in the other.
View attachment 22204
View attachment 22205
View attachment 22206
View attachment 22207
View attachment 22208
View attachment 22209
View attachment 22210
View attachment 22211
View attachment 22212
View attachment 22213


Then how about the great aft deck and its additional galley, outdoor grill, and dining area.

This vessel drafts 3... feet, and is powered by two 6 cyl Cummins engines of 210HP . It will do 17 knots while using a fraction of the fuel of many yachts this size. It is highly maneuverable with those twin props widely spaced apart. Its easy to get on and off the tender from those swim platforms, and in fact could easily carry two tenders (his and hers), or other water toys. It has a generator and a watermaker, and a highly insulated refrig box and freezer that only requires running one engine once every two days. Its self-sufficient. The cost...less than $1M. I envy his choice.
 
Last edited:
Hollywood wrote;

"Really the term we all should use is passagemaker"

Since we are a trawler forum "passagemaker" should rarely be seen here. Generally I don't care to discuss them.

Quote from parmenter's quote (no reference given).

"Recreational trawlers, on the other hand, are as likely to have a semi-displacement hull". But it should have said "are much more likely" ....

Then Chapman (as quoted by Mark) says;

""The trawler's hull is a displacement design to ride through and not over the water ... Speed is normally limited to hull speed".

On most trawlers speed is NOT "limited to hull speed" even though most do run at hull speed. Almost always people seem to forget full disp boats do NOT run at hull speed but about one knot slower. And at some point probably before hull speed is reached a vessel is partly riding up over the wave it generates. So in trawlerdom there is as much riding up over the water as riding through the water. Perhaps or most likely more as I believe an increase in angle of attack occurs below hull speed.

Mark's quoting Chapman;

""Within the commercial fishing community, the word "trawler" has a specific meaning relating to a style of fishing, but in recreational boating the term is used much more loosely. In general, a cruiser that does not have sufficient horsepower to get into a planing mode is known as a TRAWLER"

The above last quote is (I think) a fairly good description of what a recreational trawler is.
 
Last edited:
Mark's quoting Chapman;

""Within the commercial fishing community, the word "trawler" has a specific meaning relating to a style of fishing, but in recreational boating the term is used much more loosely. In general, a cruiser that does not have sufficient horsepower to get into a planing mode is known as a TRAWLER"

The above last quote is (I think) a fairly good description of what a recreational trawler is.

As none of those powercat trawlers get on the plane, no matter how much HP you throw at them, I win the internets :D
 
Just checking in - great thread!

Our power cat, "Sunshine," is able to get about infinate/mpg at 4 to 5 knots!
 
>Really the term we all should use is passagemaker.

Dashew doesnt call those tin cans he builds "trawlers".. they are fast pasysage makers.<

I sort of think Passagemaker should be reserved for the one boat in 100 (perhaps 1000?) that can easily cross even a small ocean.

Crossing on the deck of a ship doesnt count.

The Dashew boats are passagemakers , few trawlers OR cats are ocean crossing useful.
 
Cats as Passagemakers

FF,

The one thing that should be noted is that if you factor in the ability to use sail assist, cats can easily become passage makers. They do suffer from load carrying capacity in fuel dept but are much easier to move along under sail assist as well thereby increasing range dramatically. Of course I follow and love the Dashew FPBs and really like Tads Passagemaker concepts as well. I just happen to be a multihull guy and think that you shouldn't rule out the two or three huller just yet..:)
John from Morganscloud had some interesting article about a perfect sailors motorboat? And almost touched on the multihull possibility. I sent him an email encouraging to follow through on his thoughts... We'll see..:whistling:
 
For some people is all about the destinations while for others all about the journey. I for one say You are certainly no less a passage maker for hitching a ride to your destination onboard a freighter Mark. :thumb:

I have plenty of clients who ship boats to their cruising grounds.. It can actually a be a very economical way to cruise when you consider wear & tear, time away from work & family, fuel costs, etc.

The funny thing is you don't get a gold star or ribbon just because you got to your destination on your own bottom. Sure you get bragging rights, but that's about it, plus you get to experience the adventure.
But why be so hard on the designs out there that aren't equipped to get there on their own? :dance:
 
If this forum were limited to the traditional "trawler yacht " definition, a full displacement, voyaging yacht, then participation would be a small fraction of what it now is. For most of us, "trawler" has come to mean a cruising yacht vs. a weekendender or marina potato.

From the lively conversations, the members include those with:

1. FD voyagers
2. SD coastal cruisers
3. Planing cruisers
4. Power cats (that'd be me )
5. Power trimarans
6. And a few motor sailors, too ?

Why not put to rest this endless jabber about the definition of a "real" trawler. Obviously we all enjoy getting out on the water, whether to cross oceans, live aboard or never lose sight of land (that'd also be me).

While I'm ready to applaud those who cross oceans on their own bottoms, I'm firmly in the. "Deck cargo " camp. Right now I'm working on an ultra-efficient cruiser that folds small enough to fit in a standard 40' shipping container. For about $2,500 you can ship any whet in the world and fly first class to meet her.
 
Reuben, if that project ever goes anywhere I'd love to hear more about it. I for one have absolutely no desire to cross oceans below 30,000 feet.
 
This powercat pulled into our dock at Pensacola yesterday and I got to spend a while talking to the captain about it. It's a very large cat - 82' x 32' constructed of carbon fiber.

It was an amazing vessel.

537b.jpg


More info here:
Catamaran from Nova Scotia Yard
hotip537.htm
 
Thats a big cat Active. A lot of $$ in Carbon.
I like the top pilothouse configuration but would love to see it with some more modern style plumb or reverse bows... but to each his own right?

We recently added an updated Cabin profile option to our model but I prefer the more aggressive look of the original design.
;) What do you think..
MP52-Trawlercolor.jpg
MP52-Trawler_Cabin2.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom