|
|
10-19-2016, 08:55 AM
|
#1
|
Guru
City: Punta Gorda, fl
Vessel Name: Escapade
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 37 2002
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,231
|
RPM's And Fuel Used Per Mile
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 09:13 AM
|
#2
|
Guru
City: Fort Myers, FL... Summers in the Great Lakes
Vessel Name: Slow Hand
Vessel Model: Cherubini Independence 45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,818
|
I normally cruise at 7 knots, 3.5 NMPG, 2 GPH. Had to kick it up a bit at the Alligator river bridge as the tender was holding it for us. 8 knots was 4+ GPH, <2 NMPG. Not worth the extra fuel for normal cruising.
Ted
__________________
Blog: mvslowhand.com
I'm tired of fast moves, I've got a slow groove, on my mind.....
I want to spend some time, Not come and go in a heated rush.....
"Slow Hand" by The Pointer Sisters
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 09:29 AM
|
#3
|
Guru
City: Kitimat, North Coast BC
Vessel Name: Badger
Vessel Model: 30' Sundowner Tug
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,946
|
We cruise at 2700 rpm and let the speed fall wherever it may due to currents and/or wind, with an average speed of somewhere around 7 knots. Over the course of a year it averages out to be a bit over 1.25 gallons per hour for the 100hp Yanmar 4JH2-UTE the previous owner put in.
Next year I'm thinking of dialing it back to 2600 rpm to knock down the bow wave a bit and to see how much of an effect it has on fuel consumption over the course of a year. Hoping it'll settle out to 1gph for relatively effortless fuel/distance/time calculations...
__________________
"The most interesting path between two points is not a straight line" MurrayM
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 10:23 AM
|
#4
|
Guru
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
|
Even though we boat twelve months a year, fuel burn is our least expense. We spend far more on slip fees than we do on fuel burn.
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 10:33 AM
|
#5
|
Guru
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,738
|
Murray,
You're only burning a quart an hour more than we are. Probably a bit more efficient engine and less weight. Rpm isn't very meaningful unless you state your rated power rpm AND what rpm you get at WOT. We cruise ay 6.15 knots at 2300 but top out at 3000 .... rated rpm. I'm at 50% load. You're probably at about 30%. The 4JH series is a wonderful engine .. so I've heard many times.
__________________
Eric
North Western Washington State USA
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 12:24 PM
|
#6
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
Most engines and engine combinations follow a similar pattern, regardless of type boat. Almost all displacement and semi-displacement do.
Now, as a comparison, take most higher speed boats, 40 knots or so WOT and it's a much different pattern. For instance, MAN 800's and 1360's on these boats show very little difference from 1250 to 2000 rpm. They do show higher nmpg at 1000 and a big drop-off at 2300.
Most outboards I've looked at have what to diesel inboard owners appears to be a very strange curve. Often they hit a low point (low nmpg) around 2000 rpm and then improve up to 3000 rpm or so where they get their best mileage. Then they drop off gradually to about 4500 or 5000 rpm but still better than the low point around 2000 rpm. However, it's really much like a bell curve. Then above 5000 rpm they may or may not drop further and more rapidly.
|
|
|
10-19-2016, 05:28 PM
|
#7
|
TF Site Team
City: Brisbane
Vessel Name: Insequent
Vessel Model: Ocean Alexander 50 Mk I
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,260
|
By coincidence I just finished a 93 day cruise yesterday and looked at the figures.
Trip distance - 2035 nm
Fuel - 1532 USG
Economy - 1.33 nmpg
Engine hours - 263
Average speed overall - 7.7 kn
Whales hit - 0, but a very near miss 2 days ago!
__________________
Brian
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 08:14 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
City: Bucksport, Maine
Vessel Name: T/T Whistful
Vessel Model: Boat US 12' Inflatable
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ancora
Even though we boat twelve months a year, fuel burn is our least expense. We spend far more on slip fees than we do on fuel burn.
|
This is very similar to our motor home. Fuel is our smallest expense, but it is frequently the first thing someone asks about.
At gas stations, there have been many times when folks will say "Wow...that's a beautiful rig!...but what do you get for mileage?" I frequently respond with "Oh...around 22-24mpg", just to watch their expressions...then explain that we get about 7-8mpg and are very content with that.
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 09:33 AM
|
#9
|
Guru
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 37
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,107
|
Rmp are about, speed and consumption smartcraft from cummins computer.
Boat Nordic Tug 37, cummins qsb 5.9 380hp, twindisc mg506sc1 2.41:1
19knots 20,0 gal/ hours 3050 rmp
15 knots 13,4 gal / hours 2550 rmp
9,0 knots 4,2 gal / hoursabout1700 rmp
8,5knots 2,9 gal/hours about 1500 rmp
8 knots 2,1 gal /hours about1400 rmp
7,5knots 1,4 gal/ hours about1300 rmp
7,0knots 1,23al/ hours about 1200 rmp
6,5knots 1,1 gal /hours
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 09:48 AM
|
#10
|
Guru
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,738
|
Everybody figures it differently ...
So I pay almost no attention to fuel burn numbers on the internet or via " dock talk.
__________________
Eric
North Western Washington State USA
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 10:51 AM
|
#11
|
Guru
City: Maine Coast
Vessel Name: Tortuga
Vessel Model: Nunes Brothers Raised Deck Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 889
|
I normally run at 2,000 rpms for about 7 knots. Fuel burn there is 0.7 gph. If I slow down to 5.5 knots (1550 rpms) I burn about 0.25 gph. Wide open throttle is 3,100 rpms. The boat will do 9 knots at WOT on 2.25 gph. I averaged about 0.4 gph this summer because my wife prefers the quieter ride at 1,550 rpms.
The boat is 32'5.5" LOA, 32' LWL, 9,500 pounds displacement. The engine is a Volvo-Penta D2-40 (40 hp). I carry 40 gallons of fuel so my 7 knot range is about 360 miles assuming a 10% reserve. At 5.5 knots my range is about 790 miles.
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 01:07 PM
|
#12
|
Guru
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,738
|
TDunn,
What is the displacement of that Volvo? My Mitsu is 37hp from 107 cu. in. ... 78mm X 92mm.
__________________
Eric
North Western Washington State USA
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 07:47 PM
|
#13
|
Guru
City: Tri Cities, WA
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,406
|
My boat's WOT is 2150rpm's and it's running at 30.1kts and burning 65gph. Ouch.
Our normal cocktail cruise speed is at 950rpm's at 9.5-10kts. At planing speed we're at 1750rpm's (80% of WOT) and running between 19-22kts.
I haven't actually calculated fuel burn at either cruise speed but at cocktail speed I've rough guessed at ~1nmpg. At planing speed it's a bit less than that.
I've been told and read that the most efficient speed is the boat's "hull speed". That number is entirely dependent on the length of the waterline on the hull. Here's the formula:
Hull Speed = 1.34 * [square root of LWL]
If your LWL is 36', the square root of that would be 6 and 6 times 1.34 would mean your hull speed is 8.04kts. My LWL is about 52' so my hull speed is 9.66kts.
__________________
Mike and Tina
1981 Boston Whaler 13'
|
|
|
10-20-2016, 08:01 PM
|
#14
|
Guru
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
|
The boat we're looping on:
RPM Knots Gal/Hr NM/Gal Range 90% Decibels
-900 10 9 1.11 925 62
1200 12 21 0.57 476 64
1400 15 33 0.45 378 66
1600 19 46 0.41 344 69
1800 24 64 0.38 312 70
1950 26 79 0.33 274 71
2150 29 99 0.29 244 74
2300 31 109 0.28 237 75
2400 32 117 0.27 228 76
Cruise is 27-28 knots. (70-80% load).
And best fuel economy is generally slightly below calculated hull speed. We could do ok at knots. Did ok coming down the Illinois and Mississippi, but we were so happy to be able to run at speed again.
|
|
|
10-21-2016, 07:21 AM
|
#15
|
Guru
City: Newark, DE
Vessel Name: Infinity
Vessel Model: Kadey Krogen 48
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomad Willy
Everybody figures it differently ...
So I pay almost no attention to fuel burn numbers on the internet or via " dock talk.
|
I've found with both aircraft and boats pretty much everyone with an identical model claims to go faster than I do and burn less fuel.
Guess I have a knack for buying bad examples of products.
|
|
|
10-21-2016, 08:34 AM
|
#16
|
Guru
City: Maine Coast
Vessel Name: Tortuga
Vessel Model: Nunes Brothers Raised Deck Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomad Willy
TDunn,
What is the displacement of that Volvo? My Mitsu is 37hp from 107 cu. in. ... 78mm X 92mm.
|
It is 92 cu. in. and the bore/stroke is 77/81 in mm. Actual rated hp is 39.6 at 3200. Shaft hp is rated at 38 at 3,200.
|
|
|
10-21-2016, 09:18 AM
|
#17
|
Guru
City: Carefree, Arizona
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48 (sold)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,179
|
The more car, truck and boat fuel I burn the happier I am. It means we're going somewhere and doing something. On our boat fuel burn is only relevant for range considerations and the ability to wait for low priced fuel to appear over the horizon.
All BS aside, our engines are quite happy at 1650 to 1800 RPM where fuel burn is about 4 - 5 gph combined. If I wanted bragging rights for low fuel use I'd own a 30' sailboat and motor along at 5.5 knots,
|
|
|
10-21-2016, 09:38 AM
|
#18
|
Guru
City: Port Townsend Washington
Vessel Name: " OTTER "
Vessel Model: Ocean Alexander Europa 40
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunchaser
The more car, truck and boat fuel I burn the happier I am. It means we're going somewhere and doing something. On our boat fuel burn is only relevant for range considerations and the ability to wait for low priced fuel to appear over the horizon.
All BS aside, our engines are quite happy at 1650 to 1800 RPM where fuel burn is about 4 - 5 gph combined. If I wanted bragging rights for low fuel use I'd own a 30' sailboat and motor along at 5.5 knots,
|
edit...
SC, you should of said "and only use the sails".
I friend with a fantastic 45' sailboat like to brag how little fuel they use a season.. but he wastes a ton of time sitting waiting for wind while we fire up the noisemaker and travel.. there is a reason we switched from sail.
HOLLYWOOD
|
|
|
10-21-2016, 03:10 PM
|
#19
|
Guru
City: North Charleston, SC
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,869
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFC
...........I've been told and read that the most efficient speed is the boat's "hull speed". That number is entirely dependent on the length of the waterline on the hull. Here's the formula:
Hull Speed = 1.34 * [square root of LWL].
|
I posted that once and got a bunch of crap about it. One thing for certain though, in a displacement or semi displacement boat, your fuel economy goes down very quickly above hull speed.
We cruise at 2K RPM which is 7 knots through the water. Hull speed calculates as 6.83 knots but 2K RPM is a convenient number.
We normally have a significant tidal current most of the time so speed over ground (SOG) varies quite a bit. At 2K RPM, I have seen as low as 3.8 knots and as high as 12.4 knots.
Any reference to MPG is a guess at best. You can calculate it for a trip or series of trips but you can't count on it to get from point A to point B because of the current.
|
|
|
10-22-2016, 10:16 AM
|
#20
|
Guru
City: Holladay, UT
Vessel Name: Dream Catcher
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 37-065
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 841
|
We cruise mostly at 1250-1400 RPM, ~7 knots over water, or sometimes a bit more. Over the long haul (4,500nm this summer on the Inside Passage) we could count on an average of 3.4-3.5 nmpg or a bit more, despite lots of current one way or the other much of the time.
Coastal Explorer tracks miles traveled, and I divide by 3.4 to estimate fuel used. Gives me a pretty good idea how much fuel I have left in my 324 gal tanks. Correlates well with the tank watch, sight tubes, and how much it takes to re-fill.
This summer we were probably less efficient than we might have been due to worn out bottom paint, and a good bit of greenery we were hauling around. With fresh bottom paint, I hope to do a bit better next summer.
__________________
Richard Cook
Dream Catcher (Nordic Tug 37-065) Poulsbo WA
Previously: New Moon (Bounty 257), Cindy Sea (C-Dory 22 Cruiser)
"Cruising in a Big Way"
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|