Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-12-2019, 10:19 AM   #1
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Country: usa
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,009
Boeing 737 MAX

The latest MAX crash has certainly generated some concern. Friends and relatives who fly and maintain the plane seem uncertain as to whether it is design, training or maintenance related. As details emerge on Ethiopia tragedy there are statements from ground observers as to mid-air plane breakup and strange noises.

Any thoughts from TF flight professionals?
__________________
Advertisement

sunchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 11:14 AM   #2
Guru
 
Ski in NC's Avatar
 
City: Wilmington, NC
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Louisa
Vessel Model: Custom Built 38
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,303
Won't really know until they download the recorders. Probably already done due to the pressure to sort this out.

Could be the same MCAS (??) thing that took out the Lion Air Max-8. Anti-stall goes haywire and pilots did not know to turn the system off. Flick a switch then fly the plane. Got to know to flick the switch, though.
__________________

Ski in NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 11:52 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Boat's Avatar
 
City: SchoolHouse Branch
Country: USA
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 448
Too many crashes to ignore. But the cause may be as simple as a pilot in a wrestling match with a stick shaker.


https://leehamnews.com/2018/11/07/bo...-air-accident/
Boat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 05:34 PM   #4
Guru
 
BruceK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski in NC View Post
..Could be the same MCAS (??) thing that took out the Lion Air Max-8. Anti-stall goes haywire and pilots did not know to turn the system off. Flick a switch then fly the plane. Got to know to flick the switch, though.
And where the switch is.
The plane is banned from operating into/out of Australia pending a fix. Many other countries too, though not Canada and USA, according to news this morning. For us, it seems to only affect Fijian Airlines,and Singapore`s Silkair subsidiary,the latter has alternative aircraft, Fijian with a small fleet will be in trouble.
__________________
BruceK
Island Gypsy 36 Europa "Doriana"
Sydney Australia
BruceK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 05:47 PM   #5
Guru
 
AlaskaProf's Avatar
 
City: Tacoma, WA & Ashland, OR
Country: US of A
Vessel Name: SEEADLER
Vessel Model: RAWSON 41
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceK View Post
And where the switch is.

The switch (switches, actually, it's a redundant system)is right where it's been on every 737 since Lufthansa got the first one in 1968.


In this pic, on the center console just above the big red #2 engine fire handle
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Boeing-737-500-cockpit.jpg
Views:	289
Size:	158.8 KB
ID:	86371   Click image for larger version

Name:	stab trim.jpg
Views:	317
Size:	152.5 KB
ID:	86372  
AlaskaProf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:40 PM   #6
Guru
 
AlaskaProf's Avatar
 
City: Tacoma, WA & Ashland, OR
Country: US of A
Vessel Name: SEEADLER
Vessel Model: RAWSON 41
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 955
BTW:


Ethiopian co-pilot had 200 hours total flight time. I doubt he could even find the "Runaway Trim Checklist", let alone the Memory Items.


Not his fault, I suppose, someone must have told him he was qualified.


'Prof
AlaskaProf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:45 PM   #7
Guru
 
Lou_tribal's Avatar
 
City: Quebec
Country: Canada
Vessel Name: Bleuvet
Vessel Model: Custom Built
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,476
I have a flight planed in 4 weeks aboard one of these, if I survive I will tell you if it is flying well lol

L
Lou_tribal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:58 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Screaming04's Avatar
 
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 46
Perhaps if Boeing had some indicator that there was a system over-riding pilot inputs (didn't exiist in 1968) it would give pilots a fighting chance. Kinda like the traction control light in my car...
Screaming04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:13 PM   #9
Guru
 
AlaskaProf's Avatar
 
City: Tacoma, WA & Ashland, OR
Country: US of A
Vessel Name: SEEADLER
Vessel Model: RAWSON 41
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Screaming04 View Post
Perhaps if Boeing had some indicator that there was a system over-riding pilot inputs (didn't exiist in 1968) it would give pilots a fighting chance. Kinda like the traction control light in my car...
Actually, they are writing a patch as we speak to provide an MCAS alarm, but I think an uncommanded pitch down should be alarming enough...Kinda like your car drifting sideways makes the light redundant.
AlaskaProf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:18 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Screaming04's Avatar
 
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaProf View Post
Actually, they are writing a patch as we speak to provide an MCAS alarm, but I think an unconnected pitch down should be alarming enough.
Good to hear. It's a shame that a system designed to solve one problem created another.
Screaming04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:55 PM   #11
Guru
 
AlaskaProf's Avatar
 
City: Tacoma, WA & Ashland, OR
Country: US of A
Vessel Name: SEEADLER
Vessel Model: RAWSON 41
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 955
Lion Air had similar uncommanded pitchdown events on six consecutive flights, almost certainly initiated by a failed AOA sensor In the preceding five, the crews responded, in accord with the required procedure. What kind of company would continue to dispatch this flawed aircraft until it found a crew not up to the challenge?
AlaskaProf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:25 PM   #12
Guru
 
psneeld's Avatar
 
City: AICW
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Freedom
Vessel Model: Albin 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19,811
Whoa....probably still more to the story.
But so far from what I have read is the least trained are the issue...no aircraft is perfect even years after hard use.


Uncontrolled flight and the crew doesn't secure the autopilot? Wouldn't let them row my dingy to shore.
psneeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:29 PM   #13
Guru
 
tiltrider1's Avatar
 
City: Seattle
Country: USA
Vessel Name: AZZURRA
Vessel Model: Ocean Alexander 54
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaProf View Post
Lion Air had similar uncommanded pitchdown events on six consecutive flights, almost certainly initiated by a failed AOA sensor In the preceding five, the crews responded, in accord with the required procedure. What kind of company would continue to dispatch this flawed aircraft until it found a crew not up to the challenge?

This is the first question that one has to answer. The second question is how did the pilots loose situational control of an autopilot? Poor training? The max is not a new aircraft, its an upgrade to an existing certificate of air worthiness and even if the latest incident is related it comes back to training.
tiltrider1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:45 PM   #14
GFC
Guru
 
GFC's Avatar
 
City: Tri Cities, WA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Beachcomber
Vessel Model: Sea Ray 550 Sedan Bridge
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,612
When we go to and from AZ we fly Allegiant Air out of our local airport. Allegiant has gotten rid of it's aging 737 fleet and has moved to an all new fleet of jets from those "other guys" over in Europe who make Airbus planes.
__________________
Mike and Tina
Beachcomber 1995 Sea Ray 550 Sedan Bridge
GFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:57 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Screaming04's Avatar
 
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFC View Post
When we go to and from AZ we fly Allegiant Air out of our local airport. Allegiant has gotten rid of it's aging 737 fleet and has moved to an all new fleet of jets from those "other guys" over in Europe who make Airbus planes.
Allegiant had md80’s
Screaming04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:00 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Screaming04's Avatar
 
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by psneeld View Post
Whoa....probably still more to the story.
But so far from what I have read is the least trained are the issue...no aircraft is perfect even years after hard use.


Uncontrolled flight and the crew doesn't secure the autopilot? Wouldn't let them row my dingy to shore.
Lion air pilots were completely innocent in my opinion. Boeing added this feature to the aircraft, wasn’t included in training nor in the acft documentation. The aircraft doesn’t tell the pilots it’s over riding their commands and it happens with autopilot OFF. Since then, a circular has been put out to all operators.
Screaming04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:07 PM   #17
Grand Vizier
 
Delfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,428
A fundamental difference between design philosophies for Airbus and Boeing is that Boeing has always defaulted to pilot control in crisis situations, where Airbus prefers automatic systems. From what I have read, when Boeing decided to upgrade the 737 rather than white sheet a new design, they selected engines whose weight and size required changing the placement of the wings on the fuselage. That changed how the aircraft would respond and made it slightly more likely to pitch up during climb out, although I have no clue why that would be. Hence, the need for a system that corrects what amounts to an artifact of a bit of a kludge to accommodate new engines. The black box data should provide lots of insights, so until then, no one knows for sure what happened. However, it is possible we will never get a definitive answer that is made public. I say that based on a conversation I had with a fairly drunk Boeing technician in first class (free drinks) who was put in charge of replacing all the pylons on 747s worldwide. I asked him if he worked for Boeing because he had a whopper 3 ring binder with Boeing on the cover, and the flight we were on was returning to Seattle.

He said he did, and about 5 drinks later we got to talking about the crash of TWA 800 off New York. Many witnesses said that they observed a rocket hitting the aircraft and bringing it down, but the official explanation was an explosion in the fuel tanks. The tech confided to me - and you can take this or leave it as truth - that it was that crash that had occupied his time for the last two years. I asked why, and after pausing, he said it was because the design of the engine pylons was the actual cause. According to him, these were originally designed to break away from the wing if a bird strike or other catastrophic event damaged the turbine, which causes the engine to vibrate so much the concern was wing damage. He said that what happened to TWA 800 was a bird strike on the port outer engine. The engine broke loose as it was designed to do, but had sufficient fuel in the lines to keep burning for a few more seconds. The result was that the engine became a missile, and looped back and impacted the fuselage just forward of the wings, bringing the plane down and explaining why so many were convinced a land fired missile caused the crash.

I have no way of knowing whether this was fact or fiction, but I did verify after I got home that Boeing had, in fact, replaced all pylons on all 747s after this crash so it has the ring of truth. I mention this in context to this most recent crash because grounding the entire fleet would be almost as disruptive to air travel, world commerce, etc. as grounding all 747s would have been, which never happened. So, if I had to guess, these crashes will be put down to pilot error, but Boeing will fix whatever caused the issue and we will never get a comprehensive explanation.
__________________
Delfin
"Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis." - Jack Handy
Delfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:10 PM   #18
Grand Vizier
 
Delfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Screaming04 View Post
Lion air pilots were completely innocent in my opinion. Boeing added this feature to the aircraft, wasn’t included in training nor in the acft documentation. Since then, a circular has been put out to all operators.
I believe that is incorrect. The system was not called an MCAS in the training manual, but its existence is explained, as well as the fix, which is simply flipping a switch to turn off auto trim. All modern aircraft have automatic trim capability, and all pilots should understand how to turn it off. What is new with this aircraft is the need for a response from the auto trim system when it is detected that the nose is pitching up, but not the auto trim.
__________________
Delfin
"Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis." - Jack Handy
Delfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:29 PM   #19
Guru
 
BruceK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaProf View Post
BTW:


Ethiopian co-pilot had 200 hours total flight time. I doubt he could even find the "Runaway Trim Checklist", let alone the Memory Items.


Not his fault, I suppose, someone must have told him he was qualified.


'Prof
What were the Captain`s accrued hours to date of death?
__________________
BruceK
Island Gypsy 36 Europa "Doriana"
Sydney Australia
BruceK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 10:00 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Screaming04's Avatar
 
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delfin View Post
I believe that is incorrect. The system was not called an MCAS in the training manual, but its existence is explained, as well as the fix, which is simply flipping a switch to turn off auto trim. All modern aircraft have automatic trim capability, and all pilots should understand how to turn it off. What is new with this aircraft is the need for a response from the auto trim system when it is detected that the nose is pitching up, but not the auto trim.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610

Read the aftermath section about “difference training” and the changes to the flight manual.
__________________

Screaming04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012
×