Will covering VHF antenna affect performance?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Mako

Guru
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
3,320
Location
USA
Does a VHF antenna radiate solely from the tip or does the shaft itself contribute? I would like to slip a light gauge metal tube over it on my launch for use as a flag staff. So the 8ft antenna would be covered 7ft but leave the top 1ft tip exposed. Any knowledgeable electricians out there know about this?
 
I'm only planning on using it in this manner when anchored (to raise my dive flag, anchor ball, etc.). Perhaps a PVC pipe would be better and at least allow some reception?
 
I have seen these disassembled. Definitely do not put metal around it. If you go the pvc route make sure it is not putting any stress on the antenna via a lever effect.
 
Yes, the length of the antenna is used. Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) and other things all play into this. You can't cover it with metal and I wouldn't cover it with anything else either. Put up a second pole for the flag.

Jeff
 
Yup. . . I'll second that!! A flag flapping in the breeze can add a lot of load to a staff. Fiberglass exposed to sun and weather weakens and becomes more brittle as it ages. I've seen antennaes that have fractured due to relatively small flags and pennants attached to them.
 
Does a VHF antenna radiate solely from the tip or does the shaft itself contribute? I would like to slip a light gauge metal tube over it on my launch for use as a flag staff. So the 8ft antenna would be covered 7ft but leave the top 1ft tip exposed. Any knowledgeable electricians out there know about this?

It does not radiate from the tip, it radiates from the entire length. A seven foot metal tube would make a pretty good electromagnetic shield and I would predict that the antenna would not transmit or receive at all.

Scrap this idea and find another way to fly your flag.
 
I agree w/ all the above. Break the antenna, another $100+ boat buck and then you'll find another place to fly the flag.
 
I've seen antennaes that have fractured due to relatively small flags and pennants attached to them.

But, if you must, Taylor make Charlevoix Nylon Burgee/Antenna Flag Clips that will allow you to attach small flags or burgees to an antenna mast without electronic interference. As stated by others though, best to attach them to a flag pole/staff or hoist.

Larry
M/V Boomarang
 
Don't put a metal cover over it..if it's just temporary for the circumstances or day...heck just use some cheapo wire ties. As long as you are not in a gale or running with the flag still up....you will not probably damage the antenna as large numbers of boaters and commercial firms do it all the time with no ill effects.
 
No way should you put a 7' metal tube around your 8' VHF antenna unless you don't want the VHF radio to work. The entire length of the antenna is used, adding a metal tube around it is like putting the antenna in a Faraday cage meaning it will not work.
Either use wire ties and a small flag or find another more conventional way to mount your flag that doesn't involve your VHF radio antenna.
Bill
 
Last edited:
Wow a thread where we all agree! Mark it!

Ha!!! Spoke too soon!!

Many antennae the active part is only the last 18" or so. Noticed this when stupid operator (me) ran a skiff under a low bridge and forgot to drop the VHF ant. Busted it properly!! Got a chance to look at insides: Just coax up into bore, and last 18" or so stripped to reveal inner conductor. So you could put something metallic on it and provided it did not cover the active part up top. That might have been a POS ant, though. I'm known to go cheap!

But antenna design is part black magic.. Tried to study it but my brain does not work that way. There is matching of antenna length to wavelength, not sure what 155MHz comes out to.

PVC pipe and zip ties sounds like a good plan. I might do the same for mine. Fair weather only, of course.
 
Greetings,
From what I understand the co-ax leading to the antenna also comes into play with the tuning circuit so if you ever install a new antenna do NOT cut the co-ax as supplied to make a "neater" job. If you HAVE to cut the co-ax there is a formula for the "best" length. I'm sure some radio hams on TF could add to my somewhat poor understanding of this black magic.
 
Greetings,
From what I understand the co-ax leading to the antenna also comes into play with the tuning circuit so if you ever install a new antenna do NOT cut the co-ax as supplied to make a "neater" job. If you HAVE to cut the co-ax there is a formula for the "best" length. I'm sure some radio hams on TF could add to my somewhat poor understanding of this black magic.

Unfortunately, most hams do not really understand antenna principles either. :) There are good books on it, with a whole lot of math. The good news is that for VHF on the marine bands it really doesn't make all that much difference. Oh, the antenna should be the proper length, the coax should be of good quality, no corrosion on the connectors, and doing an SWR check every now and then is a good thing to do (SWR meters are inexpensive). But line of sight communication (VHF) with 25 watts of output power and a decent antenna is pretty easy.
 
Ha!!! Spoke too soon!!

Many antennae the active part is only the last 18" or so. Noticed this when stupid operator (me) ran a skiff under a low bridge and forgot to drop the VHF ant. Busted it properly!! Got a chance to look at insides: Just coax up into bore, and last 18" or so stripped to reveal inner conductor. So you could put something metallic on it and provided it did not cover the active part up top. That might have been a POS ant, though. I'm known to go cheap!

But antenna design is part black magic.. Tried to study it but my brain does not work that way. There is matching of antenna length to wavelength, not sure what 155MHz comes out to.

PVC pipe and zip ties sounds like a good plan. I might do the same for mine. Fair weather only, of course.

Likely a crappy antenna, but what size and model was it? I have twice attended antenna dissection exercises and the really low end ones can be as you describe. Gee, nobody on TF would have one of those would they..... uh, whoops, maybe it would be OK!
 
Ha!!! Spoke too soon!!

Many antennae the active part is only the last 18" or so. Noticed this when stupid operator (me) ran a skiff under a low bridge and forgot to drop the VHF ant. Busted it properly!! Got a chance to look at insides: Just coax up into bore, and last 18" or so stripped to reveal inner conductor. So you could put something metallic on it and provided it did not cover the active part up top. That might have been a POS ant, though. I'm known to go cheap!

But antenna design is part black magic.. Tried to study it but my brain does not work that way. There is matching of antenna length to wavelength, not sure what 155MHz comes out to.

PVC pipe and zip ties sounds like a good plan. I might do the same for mine. Fair weather only, of course.
That's about a 1/4 wavelength at VHF marine frequencies. You have a no gain antenna. Also be careful the coaxial shield you see may need an additional what I call fold over of the shield for the ground plane for impedance matching. Most marine antennas that have gain are collinear design antennas they are typically 5/8ths wavelength and require chokes for impedance matching. If you cut one of these apart you would see gold plated rods and what look like round collars.
It's still not a good idea to install a 7' piece of metal even assuming your antenna is only a 1/4 wavelength. You would still be covering 4-6 inches of the radiating element with metal, metal around an antenna can lower it's resonant frequency (it acts like an RF capacitor) and will raise the VSWR to the point your VHF radio may fold back it's output power to protect it's transmitter from the terrible return loss (high VSWR).
Bill
 
I wouldn't want to jeopardize my $100+ antenna with flying a flag...especially one as important as a Dive Flag. It's easy to get a simple flagstaff to connect to a rail for proper flag display. I have a spare SS antenna rail mount that would work well for that.

SHA-4190_med.jpg
 
Unfortunately, most hams do not really understand antenna principles either.

And I include myself in that category, although I have an Extra Class ham license (AF4WM), have been a ham for some 47 years, and have a few QRP awards stuck away in a desk drawer somewhere.

But I was thinking about the OP's question some, mostly because it is a rainy Saturday afternoon and nothing better to do. An RF signal is a sine wave, and when it leaves the transmitter, hustles through the coax, and through the wiring in the antenna, then in a perfect situation it will exit the antenna as an acceptable part of a sine wave. That is, not cut off too soon or too late. Channel 16 of the marine band is 156.8 Megahertz. At that frequency, one wave-length (how long the sine wave is before it starts to repeat) is about 75.3 inches, or 6.275 feet.

VHF Marine antennas typically use 1/4 wavelength, 1/2 wavelength, and 5/8th wavelength ratios. A 1/4 wave antenna then would be an antenna with an electrical length one-fourth of the actual signal's wavelength, or about 18.8 inches. Lots of sailboats (mine included, back when I had a sailboat) just stick a 19-inch whip at the top of the mast and that works just fine.

Trawler people typically use 8-foot antennas, which one might think would be a full wave-length, but actually are not necessarily so. Usually the coax just continues on up into the fiberglass, and the actual antenna is -- surprise! -- only 19 inches.

All of which is by way of thinking that I am not absolutely certain that putting a piece of PVC pipe over the antenna, with some of the antenna sticking out above, would not work perfectly well. Not saying it would, mind you, and if others more knowledgeable about the subject want to correct me I shall not take it amiss.
 
Full wavelength antennas are difficult if not impossible to match. There is also a problem with the phase angle. Most 8' antennas are either 1/2 or 5/8ths wavelengths. The shorter 4' fiberglass antennas are typically the 1/4 wave antennas.
The reason for the great performance sailboats get is many masts are Aluminum so they have a ground plane and your height above average terrain is far better than most Trawlers. 8' and 16' VHF antennas are used to get additional height for the typical mode of VHF Marine FM line of site (aka LOS).
I'm a real Extra as well (20wpm code)
AA2UK
Bill
 
The 16-22 foot antennas are usually 10db where the 8 footers are 6db.

While VHF is usually regarded as line of site...and terrain is different than curvature just of the earth blocking....VHF can and often exceeds 100 miles with enough power.

In the Cape May area...USCG stations in Massachusetts to North Carolina can be heard transmitting..my personal best was from a USCG Helo in a 50' hover over a cruise ship and talking to Cape May about 120NM away.

35-40 NM with a 10db antenna and a good receiving antenna is pretty common in my experience.

Again...my experience is discussing "open water" reception.
 
While VHF is usually regarded as line of sight...and terrain is different than curvature just of the earth blocking....VHF can and often exceeds 100 miles with enough power.

Absolutely true. But it cannot be depended upon, because there are so many variables. And so LOS is better to take as a baseline.

Anyway, I do not like to get involved in discussions, so will back out of here. Been fun, y'all. :)
 
It's not unusual to get an ionosphere 'skip' on VHF and intermittently receive a transmission from well beyond line of sight, but it doesn't make for reliable communication. It happened frequently in air traffic control. When I was an Air Traffic Controller in San Diego, we would occasionally receive transmissions in the control tower from an ATC facility in Central CA.

In fact, the FAA has a Frequency Management office which deals with assigning and protecting communications and navigation signals from interference from distant sources on the same frequency. The area of protection, called a service volume, is MUCH greater than typical line of sight for that reason, plus the fact that aircraft at altitude can receive at much greater distances than land-based radios.
 
All I know is that higher the antennae, the longer the range.

img_249518_0_b5573c09d13d4e95c92f4a74fa584bf5.jpg
 
The 16-22 foot antennas are usually 10db where the 8 footers are 6db.

While VHF is usually regarded as line of site...and terrain is different than curvature just of the earth blocking....VHF can and often exceeds 100 miles with enough power.

In the Cape May area...USCG stations in Massachusetts to North Carolina can be heard transmitting..my personal best was from a USCG Helo in a 50' hover over a cruise ship and talking to Cape May about 120NM away.

35-40 NM with a 10db antenna and a good receiving antenna is pretty common in my experience.

Again...my experience is discussing "open water" reception.
Quite true but not reliable past LOS. The method that allows VHF signals to propagate like you mention is called tropo ducting. It's usually caused by a stagnant high pressure system where the gradients stack up. There is also a temperature component to it where this causes a duct in the atmosphere hence the term ducting.
I have heard it numerous times over the years and the 1st clue is my AIS screen populating with stations from areas not normally seen and at distances greater than 60 miles. Last year we heard USCG Jacksonville, Fla from Little Egg Bay, NJ. That's about as far south as I have ever heard on the VHF marine band.
It is possible for E Skip to happen in our VHF band but that is extremely rare and it is very short duration and usually limited to one area. Tropo usually opens up the entire coast in the direction of the ducting. The morning we heard Jacksonville we also heard Charleston, SC along with many far but still distant USCG stations along the coast to the south.
Bill
 
All I know is that higher the antennae, the longer the range.

But to get the benefit of the higher antenna and to get the longer range you need to be using bigger coax to reduce signal loss. Using RG58-U cable with a 40' run, you loss about -2.4dB vs if you used RG213 you only loose -1.0dB.
 
For shorter runs it's pretty hard to beat RG-8X losses at 156.8MHz. I prefer LMR400 over UG-213 either is excellent at VHF frequencies.
Bill
 
Last edited:
But to get the benefit of the higher antenna and to get the longer range you need to be using bigger coax to reduce signal loss. Using RG58-U cable with a 40' run, you loss about -2.4dB vs if you used RG213 you only loose -1.0dB.

Very true and for some reason it has just now occurred to me that maybe that is why it is so hard to get some sailboats to answer a VHF call? (;o) All this time I thought it has something to do with that Maple Leaf flag flying off the back causing some sort of interference...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
George I have seen many sailboats where the VHF radio is in the cabin not at the helm.
That could be part of the problem as well?
Bill
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom