New battery setup

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

fryedaze

Guru
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Messages
1,721
Location
USA
Vessel Name
Fryedaze
Vessel Make
MC 42 (Overseas Co) Monk 42
I am looking for feedback on my recent playtime in the engine room. I recently had a 6 volt battery fail and then this week my Stb 8D start/house battery fail. I have made changes to the distribution and would like some feedback if I am off base on my thinking. I intend to run the system in postion 2 on the A/B switch so that everything is run off the 8 new 6 volt batteries in the house bank. The old system was run in "Both" on the A/B switch. I replace the failed 8D with a 4D to save my jewels :blush:. Let me know if you see flaws in this.
 

Attachments

  • Old boat electric.jpg
    Old boat electric.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 120
  • New boat electric.jpg
    New boat electric.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 128
Dave, suggest you move the cable that connects those items on position 1 to position 2 as you are running them always as a combined bank. Then connect the 4D battery from the Genset and port engine to position 1. In normal operation you can operate just on position 2, but in a pinch you can bring the 4D battery from position 1 online.

How are you charging these batteries now?

Marty
 
Dave, suggest you move the cable that connects those items on position 1 to position 2 as you are running them always as a combined bank. Then connect the 4D battery from the Genset and port engine to position 1. In normal operation you can operate just on position 2, but in a pinch you can bring the 4D battery from position 1 online.

How are you charging these batteries now?

Marty

Your suggestion would tie the eight new 6 volt batteries bank to the three year old 8D battery. Is there a down side to battery performance with a setup like that. I thought I read that when you replace batteries in a bank they should all be the same age.
The three banks are charged with a 40+ amp multi-stage charger designed for three battery banks.
While cruising they are charged by a Promariner 2-4 Islocharger that combines the alternators and prioritzes charging to the start batteries.
 
You make a good point about combining the 8D with the new batteries, except you are already doing that via your battery switch being left in the "Both" position. This is the equivalent of a direct connection.

You may want to get some charging advice. You are charging all the batteries at the same time from one charger so that the charger senses the weakest. If you want to maintain different age batteries it may be necessary to charge them separately.

Marty
 
Thanks Marty, I just read my charger manual and I had a big misconception on how it operated.

Simultaneous Three-Battery Bank Charging​
Truecharge+ has three separate DC positive terminals to allow charging
of three separate batteries (or battery banks). The total current into the
batteries is a maximum of either 20 amperes or 40 amperes, depending on
the model, which is divided amongst the batteries according to their state
of discharge.​

Note:​
The three outputs are not independently voltage regulated so it

is important to avoid systems with mixed types of batteries.
 
I am looking for feedback on my recent playtime in the engine room. I recently had a 6 volt battery fail and then this week my Stb 8D start/house battery fail. I have made changes to the distribution and would like some feedback if I am off base on my thinking. I intend to run the system in postion 2 on the A/B switch so that everything is run off the 8 new 6 volt batteries in the house bank. The old system was run in "Both" on the A/B switch. I replace the failed 8D with a 4D to save my jewels :blush:. Let me know if you see flaws in this.


Good start

Now, make it better...

1. Install an ACR jumping around the a/b switch. (this will allow the engine to charge the house bank)

2. Make the a/b switch either an on/off switch, and tie the dc panel to the house bank, or replace the a/b switch with an a/b/combine switch. (this will allow you to combine the banks in an emergency in case a bank fails)

3. install a on/off switch between the starboard and port banks. (this will allow emergency combining of banks in case a bank fails)
 
Good start

Now, make it better...

1. Install an ACR jumping around the a/b switch. (this will allow the engine to charge the house bank)
I have a Promariner Isocharger that combines the output of both alternators and feeds all three banks based on priority.
2. Make the a/b switch either an on/off switch, and tie the dc panel to the house bank, or replace the a/b switch with an a/b/combine switch. (this will allow you to combine the banks in an emergency in case a bank fails)
The A/B switch is actually A/B/Both/Off
3. install a on/off switch between the starboard and port banks. (this will allow emergency combining of banks in case a bank fails)
Good suggestion, I have a heavy set of jumpers for emergencies

Thanks for the feedback
 
At the risk of being shot down, but since I like to TRY to help, I just threw this together. Y'all check my work and see if this is right. Certainly, minus a few buss bars and more details. See if this helps.
 

Attachments

  • Wiring Idea.jpg
    Wiring Idea.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 87
At the risk of being shot down, but since I like to TRY to help, I just threw this together. Y'all check my work and see if this is right. Certainly, minus a few buss bars and more details. See if this helps.

Thanks Tom, it looks like my lack of detail probably didnt help my cause here. I like the tie idea between the 4D and the 8D if needed. Here is a better picture of whay I have.
 

Attachments

  • boat batts.jpg
    boat batts.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 102
I don't trust the ISO Charger doing so much and having so many things attached to it. It makes it too much of a single-point-of-failure. If you lose it, you lose everything. But that's just me.
 
I don't trust the ISO Charger doing so much and having so many things attached to it. It makes it too much of a single-point-of-failure. If you lose it, you lose everything. But that's just me.

Good point Tom. My back up plan is the fact that the engines have battery isolation switches right next to the Iso charger and I can pull the leads and return the configuration to allow the alternators to supply directly to the batteries.
 
I understand, but in a failure situation, you have opened yourself up to not only lose battery power, but one or both alternators. You also need to be careful with 1/2/off/all switches. There are a lot of people that don't use them (me included). Another SPOF and opens you up for a mistake by leaving it in the wrong position.

Here is the thread from my recent charging system upgrade:

http://www.trawlerforum.com/forums/s4/winter-project-i-charging-system-upgrade-5641.html

Hope it helps a little. I looked for my finalized wiring diagram, but can't seem to put my hands on it right now. Hmmm... I'll keep looking.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Tom, it looks like my lack of detail probably didnt help my cause here. I like the tie idea between the 4D and the 8D if needed. Here is a better picture of whay I have.


Dave, For allot of reasons I'd make long term plans to eliminate the the promariner combiner from your design.

First, as others have indicated it creates a single point of failure in your system. We want to avoid single points of failure at all cost.

Second, the physical layout of that unit, is in my opinion a safety hazard in itself. The reason is that the studs sticking out are not physically isolated from each other. I'm not a fan of that because of the risk of short circuit. Almost every other piece of equipment I've seen and worked on has physical barriers between the studs.

There are other solutions on the market that can solve the charging challenges of multiple sources and multiple battery banks without creating a single point of failure, or a risk of short circuit.
 
Dave, For allot of reasons I'd make long term plans to eliminate the the promariner combiner from your design.

First, as others have indicated it creates a single point of failure in your system. We want to avoid single points of failure at all cost.

Second, the physical layout of that unit, is in my opinion a safety hazard in itself. The reason is that the studs sticking out are not physically isolated from each other. I'm not a fan of that because of the risk of short circuit. Almost every other piece of equipment I've seen and worked on has physical barriers between the studs.

There are other solutions on the market that can solve the charging challenges of multiple sources and multiple battery banks without creating a single point of failure, or a risk of short circuit.

Kevin, I don't share your concern over potential short circuits. With the exception of one small gage ground/neg lead in the lower corner of the unit, everything in the box is positive terminals. The unit has a clear cover that eliminates the exposed terminal risk. Every terminal is covered with a boot that was provided by the manufacturer.
 

Attachments

  • 1004131153.jpg
    1004131153.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 80
Last edited:
Kevin, I don't share your concern over potential short circuits. With the exception of one small gage ground/neg lead in the lower corner of the unit, everything in the box is positive terminals. The unit has a clear cover that eliminates the exposed terminal risk. Every terminal is covered with a boot that was provided by the manufacturer.

well, I feel a little better about the installation now, with the manufacturer provided boots. They saw the risk and took steps to mitigate it, very good.

Sometimes a design comes down to different ways to solve the same challenge.

I am a huge fan of individual ACR's. I remember thinking how much I liked the idea when they first came out, and much of the boating community was against them.

I am also a big fan of providing a manual bypass to each ACR with a on/off switch in case the unit fails.

I am also a big fan of individual on off switches, as opposed to a/b/combine/off switches. But thats just my simplistic thinking.

Anyway, with your providing a clear photo of the unit, and thinking about the boots the manufacturer provided, you solved one of my major concerns.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom