Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2012, 10:02 PM   #1
bobofthenorth's Avatar
City: Cowichan Bay, BC
Country: Canada
Vessel Name: Gray Hawk
Vessel Model: Defever 43 Offshore Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 569
New BC Pumpout Regs

I'm not sure whether this belongs here or in the general section - mods feel free to move it as you see fit.

The thread about tank capacity reminded me that there are new Canadian regs which actually were enacted several years ago but come into effect this May. Raw sewage can no longer be dumped within 3 miles of a BC coastline and treated sewage must be over a mile from the coast.

Here's a link to the act for the masochists among you:
Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships and for Dangerous Chemicals

And here's a link to Gabriola Sounder's short summary:
Gabriola Sounder News Online | News | Vessel sewage regulations coming into force this May

bobofthenorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 10:22 PM   #2
Scraping Paint
City: -
Country: -
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,748
Bob--- Thanks much for bringing this to our attention. I've always been surprised that BC allowed raw sewage dumping at all in their waters since Washington has not allowed this since before I got involved with boating here.

The problem in BC is that pumpout facilities become few and far between as one goes farther north. Although I would guess that as the new regulations become more publicised the marinas in the more remote areas may find it beneficial to install pumpouts, particuarly if they charge for using them.

I notice in your linked article that if there is no nearby pumpout facility available boaters can discharge raw sewage if there is less than six miles between shorlines if the discharge is made in the deepest water with the strongest current flow. So at least there has been some common sense involved here.

Marin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 06:31 AM   #3
swampu's Avatar

City: Biloxi, MS
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Cajun Rose
Vessel Model: Biloxi Lugger
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 988
I like the logic in the options. "The requirements for treatment are high and most pleasure and small commercial craft will not be able to install a treatment system that will be able to comply and will probably need a holding tank if they have a marine toilet." Nobody mentions if you can use a type 1 system, they just say the requirements are high and treated sewage cannot be dumped within a mile of the coast.
swampu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 07:21 AM   #4
City: North Charleston, SC
Country: USA
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,385
In the USA, it was reported not long ago that North Carolina was trying to require boaters to keep a log of their pumpouts. I don't know if they inplemented this regulation or not. It would be pretty difficult to require out of state boats to show a log of pumpouts. And of course, a pumpout log could easily be falsified.

While we don't want the QEII emptying its holding tanks in the local harbors, the sewage from recreational boats seems pretty insignificant compared to the waste deposited in the waters by dolphins, whales, manatees, and other aquatic animals.

It's legal to pee or poop directly into the water but not if it goes through a head and a macerator first. What's the sense in this?

I think the reality is, if there are no houses or other boats around, the tank gets emptied. Not on a small lake of course, but in rivers and coastal waters.
rwidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 07:43 AM   #5
TF Site Team
Larry M's Avatar
City: Friday Harbor, WA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Hobo
Vessel Model: Krogen 42-120
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,402
I find it interesting that BC is enacting pump-out regulations for vessels when Victoria still doesn't have secondary treatment and discharges over 30,000,000 gallons a day of raw sewage into the Straits.
Larry M is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:30 AM   #6
OFB's Avatar
City: Richmond bc
Country: Canada
Vessel Name: Invader no1
Vessel Model: Kishi Boat works
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 622
Here we go again.

its oh so easy to make honest working folk criminals.

Fine em and tell em oh you are such bad folk.

Poo is not the issue here in the great white north.

The stuff from the roads ya that just fine aint it.

Mandate me to cruise 15 miles into the strait and into Vancouver past the inifective treatment at Iowna in the middle of winter. Oh so enviromental.
Past the slick of oil from the streets. Past the outflow's from you name it.

Then stand up in ottawa in the house and state look what I have done for the enviroment.

You guys down south need to start taking a look in the mirror as well. At what Washington state dumps into puget sound prior to pointing your fingers north.

My god just take a look at the Alaska and GOM issues.

What a pile of BS.
OFB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:57 AM   #7
Senior Member
Larry H's Avatar
City: Pacific Northwest
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Jacari Maru
Vessel Model: Puget Trawler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 337
See this site for info: Countering Misinformation and Junk Science - RSTV


RSTV Response: 130 Million Litres sounds a lot but it is 99.97% water, has been subjected to preliminary treatment including 6mm screens (6 mm), and is discharged through 60 meter deep outfalls with long diffusers that ensure that the effluent is rapidly oxygenated. And the volume is miniscule compared to the incredible volumes of seawater and Fraser River water travelling out of the Strait, along the Canadian shore to the Pacific Ocean. Dr. Jay Cullen, a UVic oceanographer, has calculated it is 0.001% of the natural flow of water into the Strait of Juan de Fuca the equivalent of one drop in a 5 liter bucket of water.(Another way of illustrating this is 130 Million Litres a day is 1 cubic meter per second. The Fraser river average discharge is 3500 cubic meters per second.)

Converting the above numbers shows that the 'sewage' discharge is 100 US gallons per day per resident, mostly water. Humans can only produce less than a gallon per day of 'sewage'.

The holding tank on my boat is 32 gallons and lasts two people about two weeks.

An unmentioned problem is after the holding tanks are pumped out at a pumpout, what do you do with the effluent?

Small marinas on islands or in remote areas do not have a city type sewage treatment plant, and salt water and chemicals used by some boaters can screw up a septic tank system.

Larry H
Cruising the Pacific Northwest
Larry H is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012