Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2016, 08:32 PM   #41
dhays's Avatar
City: Gig Harbor
Country: United States
Vessel Name: Kinship
Vessel Model: North Pacific 43
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 5,872
Yeah, the RCWs (Revised Code of Washington) are notoriously convoluted. RCW 79A.60.640 gives the exemptions.


SPOT page
dhays is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 08:50 PM   #42
Veteran Member
SHASA III's Avatar
City: Yarrow Bay, WA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: SHASA III
Vessel Model: Transworld 40 Sundeck
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 69
Agree...the RCWs can be hard to interpret....I try to avoid them.

While redundant, I actually did get a card a couple of years ago, via the online exam, just to see what it covered (minimally adequate). What wasn't covered were things like the morons in ski boats causing massive wakes adjacent to marinas, inside the no wake signs....grumble.


Cheers, Vic
SHASA III - Transworld 40 Sundeck Tri-cabin
SHASA III is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012