|
|
06-02-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#1
|
Guru
City: Salvador - BA
Vessel Name: Rainha Jannota
Vessel Model: Curruira 46
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 667
|
Racor 10 vs 30
Gents
It looks like high bio-diesel content has a very bad relationship with the 2 or 30 microns Racor filter element. I am going now for the 10 microns
What you all think?
Thank you
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 10:07 AM
|
#2
|
TF Site Team/Forum Founder
City: League City, Tx
Vessel Name: Floatsome & Jetsome
Vessel Model: Meridian 411
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,332
|
Wheeewie!!!! I do believe there was a thread on this with extensive resources footnoted. One particular article was excellent. I have Cummins and use 10 micron on the primary Racor and then the Fleetguard Cumins spec on engine filter. That is what is recommeded from the Cummins camp!
__________________
Prairie 29...Perkins 4236...Sold
Mainship Pilot 30...Yanmar 4LHA-STP...Sold
Carver 356...T-Cummins 330B...Sold
Meridian 411...T-Cummins 450C
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 10:14 AM
|
#3
|
Guru
City: South FL
Vessel Name: Oliver
Vessel Model: Nordhavn 47 Hull# 12
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,607
|
Lugger Bob told us 30, so we run 30.
__________________
Thanks, Oliver
M/V Oliver
Nordhavn 47 Hull #12
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 10:22 AM
|
#4
|
TF Site Team/Forum Founder
City: League City, Tx
Vessel Name: Floatsome & Jetsome
Vessel Model: Meridian 411
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,332
|
This about all you need to know....and then some!!!
http://www.trawlerforum.com/forums/s...use-20023.html
PS...the search feature provided this
PSS....don't miss Tom's links on p.3 if you really want to get into theory
__________________
Prairie 29...Perkins 4236...Sold
Mainship Pilot 30...Yanmar 4LHA-STP...Sold
Carver 356...T-Cummins 330B...Sold
Meridian 411...T-Cummins 450C
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 10:51 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
City: Watch Hill RI
Vessel Name: Puffin
Vessel Model: Nordic Tug 32/34
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
|
Every one has an opinion, but go with what your engine manufacturer recommends. Generally they call for less filtration on the primary, moving to more (finer) filtration closer to the engine. For example, Cummins recommendation for my 6BTA 5.9 JWAC engine calls for a 30 micron primary (Racor), and a 10 micron FleetGuard on-engine secondary. Good enough for me.
John Baczek
Puffin, NT32-266
Watch Hill RI
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 11:35 AM
|
#6
|
Guru
City: LI or Fla
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,148
|
I use a 2 micron on my Rocna, oh dam now I did it!
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 11:40 AM
|
#7
|
Guru
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,288
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlinmike
I use a 2 micron on my Rocna, oh dam now I did it!
|
You got the filter right but the wrong anchor.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 11:43 AM
|
#8
|
Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Portuguese
Gents
It looks like high bio-diesel content has a very bad relationship with the 2 or 30 microns Racor filter element. I am going now for the 10 microns
|
Specifically, what is bad about the 2 and 30 micron elements that you expect 10 micron to solve?
I am curious about this.
__________________
Jay Leonard
Ex boats: 1983 40 Albin trunk cabin, 1978 Mainship 34 Model 1
New Port Richey, Fl
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 12:04 PM
|
#9
|
Guru
City: Concrete Washington State
Vessel Name: Willy
Vessel Model: Willard Nomad 30'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,743
|
Started out w two but decided that was too fine. I use 10 now.
jleonard,
I thought 2 may clog the filter prematurely and w stuff not an issue. After all the idea is to stop stuff that could be a problem so the largest "mesh" that will stop the bad stuff should be best. Perhaps 100 to 200 micron would cover us ???
JL re your question I don't understand why the 30 micron is in the question.
__________________
Eric
North Western Washington State USA
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 01:12 PM
|
#10
|
Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by manyboats
Started out w two but decided that was too fine. I use 10 now.
jleonard,
I thought 2 may clog the filter prematurely and w stuff not an issue. After all the idea is to stop stuff that could be a problem so the largest "mesh" that will stop the bad stuff should be best. Perhaps 100 to 200 micron would cover us ???
JL re your question I don't understand why the 30 micron is in the question.
|
Read the original post. It said 2 and 30 micron are a problem.
From MY limited knowledge of biodiesel in trucks, the first few tanksful clog filters badly. So yes 2 would likely give problems, but I want to know why the poster is choosing 10 over 30 that's all.
__________________
Jay Leonard
Ex boats: 1983 40 Albin trunk cabin, 1978 Mainship 34 Model 1
New Port Richey, Fl
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 01:19 PM
|
#11
|
Guru
City: North Carolina for now
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,348
|
Agree with using what the engine manufacturer tells you to use. Also, like others, mystified by the OP.
__________________
George
"There's the Right Way, the Wrong Way, and what some guy says he's gotten away with"
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 04:54 PM
|
#12
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,146
|
Like Jay L., my limited exposure to bio diesel suggests some differences in filtration.
The beginning use of it does tend to plug filters because of it qualities in cleaning systems and in cooler climes it thickens a bit...and there are several other issues...but why certain micron ratings are avoided long term....???
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 05:17 PM
|
#13
|
Guru
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,288
|
If you are going to start using biodiesel there are two things you might consider. #1 put what is known as a high capacity spin on mud filter with vacuum gauge and closed loop out board priming bulb fuel pump in the fuel line before your first filter and carry a half dozen spin on filters. This is a technique fishing boats with dirty old tanks that get stirred up in bad weather use. #2 your second option carry a lot of spare filter elements for your present filter. The problem with #2 is that you may not get warning before filter gets overloaded and most likely the capacity of your present filter is not near the spin on mud filter's capacity.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 08:06 PM
|
#14
|
Guru
City: Vero Beach, FL.
Vessel Name: FIREFLY
Vessel Model: Pilgrim 40
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
|
30 micron in Racors X2 with changeover valve as primary then 15mic. spin on high cap then on to the two on-engine filters whatever they are (120 Ford/Saber).
Change Racors at vacuum indication and spin on at oil change and on-engine at 300 hours/ yearly.
works
|
|
|
06-03-2015, 06:52 AM
|
#15
|
Guru
City: Annapolis
Vessel Name: Ranger
Vessel Model: 58' Sedan Bridge
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 7,088
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Portuguese
It looks like high bio-diesel content has a very bad relationship with the 2 or 30 microns Racor filter element. I am going now for the 10 microns
What you all think?
|
What is the nature of the "very bad relationship" ?
Our engine manufacturer (Cummins) recommends 30μ for primary, and I understand the Fleetguard secondaries are 10μ... so that's what we use.
Don't know whether that would change for bio, but would assume Cummins would be best to answer that question (in our case), should it arise.
I think my point is that the "best" filtration is perhaps engine-specific -- i.e., including for specific variants (N, T, TA, etc.), not just brand-specific, and very likely not generic -- in nature, perhaps best answered directly by your engine manufacturer.
-Chris
__________________
Chesapeake Bay, USA
|
|
|
06-03-2015, 07:03 AM
|
#16
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,146
|
There's also the standard recommendations the for other "special" considerations...
Bio fuel may get different recommendations so make dang sure the big picture is presented, especially if you use multiple fuel types.
|
|
|
06-03-2015, 11:11 AM
|
#17
|
Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger42c
What is the nature of the "very bad relationship" ?
|
Until we know this our replies are pretty meaningless.
__________________
Jay Leonard
Ex boats: 1983 40 Albin trunk cabin, 1978 Mainship 34 Model 1
New Port Richey, Fl
|
|
|
06-04-2015, 11:55 PM
|
#18
|
Guru
City: Cape Cod
Vessel Name: Slip Aweigh
Vessel Model: Prairie 29
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,219
|
Don't use Bio Diesel. It leaves nasty, gooey, waxy residue in your tank. NO micron of any size will help biodiesel. If I had a stove at home, furnace in my cellar or a generator at home I would use biodiesel. But since my life (and that of my guests) depend upon a good running engine in a floating environment I skip the thought of trying to save a few bucks with biodiesel. It just ain't worth it.
|
|
|
06-05-2015, 08:16 AM
|
#19
|
TF Site Team
City: Jacksonville
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,681
|
He may not have a choice with the biodiesel. Brazil last year raised their mandatory blend in diesel to 7%.
|
|
|
06-05-2015, 08:52 AM
|
#20
|
Guru
City: Cape Cod
Vessel Name: Slip Aweigh
Vessel Model: Prairie 29
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,219
|
@ Portuguese: If I may be so bold as to hijack the thread for a bit... You have a VERY interesting hull. Double chine and nice fairing. Who built her? Quite impressed with the design. Notice the rolling chocks. Were those put on as an afterthought to help with the rolling? or was it a planned design? Who was the designer?
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|