Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-06-2016, 01:49 AM   #21
Guru
 
City: Carefree, Arizona
Country: usa
Vessel Name: sunchaser V
Vessel Model: DeFever 48
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,363
Keith

Playing in Montana for awhile then back to BC.
__________________
Advertisement

sunchaser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 06:39 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Conall63's Avatar
 
City: Cape Coral, Florida
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Gra Go Deo
Vessel Model: Roberts TY 43
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 191
I second the non crack... it looks like two parts butted together.

Conall
__________________

Conall63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 08:05 AM   #23
Guru
 
City: gulf coast
Country: pinellas
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,199
is there any evidence of problems caused by the crack such as deck crazing?
bayview is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 08:25 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
City: Norfolk, VA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Slow Bells
Vessel Model: Marine Trader 38
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conall63 View Post
I second the non crack... it looks like two parts butted together.Conall
It is possible. I guess we will never really know for sure unless someone on this forum used to work where these boats were built.
seattleboatguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 08:40 AM   #25
Guru
 
psneeld's Avatar
 
City: Avalon, NJ
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Freedom
Vessel Model: Albin 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 15,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattleboatguy View Post
It is possible. I guess we will never really know for sure unless someone on this forum used to work where these boats were built.
Seems to me to be over a stress point, plus, looks like a crack to me seeing many of those types of channels cracked on all kinds of boats (hollow or filled with foam/wood).
psneeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 10:24 AM   #26
Guru
 
DHeckrotte's Avatar
 
City: Philadelphia, PA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Revel
Vessel Model: 1984 Fu Hwa 39
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 826
Ahhh, got it. You're right, the bulkhead can have had no effect on supporting the house. I would not count that deck 'beam' as much help in supporting anything, either. It's too small, not deep, and not made of anything particularly good. There's just not much chop there and few fibers in the chop would be going the right direction. I think the original designer's belief was that the entirety of the deck-house-house/top moulding, with its cored flat surfaces, was plenty good enough with the few stiffeners.

So, where to go?

Posts would be fine; they'd have to be standing on something good, like hull stringers (rather than floor, unless the floor was well supported on the stringers). I suppose they'd be a total of about 4' tall. 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" and 2" x 2" is pretty small (Euler's theory and the radius of gyration...don't ask, I don't remember). 2 1/2" x 2 1/2" would be more than adequate.

Knees would be problematical unless the hull was quite stiff or reinforced.

Plywood casework would be dandy if well thought out and supported and carrying the corner of the house.

A new beam in place of or alongside the existing would be dandy. You'd want to cut any stiffeners that the beam would cross so that the beam could be up against the deck (to reduce its obtrusiveness), then you'd tab the cut stiffeners onto the sides of the beam. The deck will have curvature so your new beam would as well. You could laminate it in place - gluing and propping each lamina up. The lamina could be 3/4" thick and as wide as the engineer says - my guess would be 2 1/2". And the thing would be stacked up (down) to be, say, 4 1/2" deep - 6 lamina. Again my guess. 12' is a long span. You'd have to tab the thing quite thickly to support the ends on the hull.
DHeckrotte is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 11:48 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
City: Norfolk, VA
Country: USA
Vessel Name: Slow Bells
Vessel Model: Marine Trader 38
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHeckrotte View Post
So, where to go?

Posts would be fine; they'd have to be standing on something good...
I think that you and I are thinking along the same lines. I'll pursue the post/column idea first, and hope for the best. I agree that distributing the load over as many load-bearing structures as possible would be a good thing. Thanks very much for your feedback.
__________________

seattleboatguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012