|
|
02-19-2019, 10:07 AM
|
#1
|
Guru
City: Boston Area
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,610
|
Prop Pockets/Tunnel Drives
These seem like a really good idea as you get shallower draft and reduced shaft angle so they're more efficient..... BUT.....since they aren't that common, there must be a downside. Can someone explain it to me ? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 10:15 AM
|
#2
|
Guru
City: gulf coast
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,440
|
IMO they reduce prop walk so that maneuvering is only done by spin not the side thrust possible with an open prop.
On faster boats they seem to increase wake probably because of reduced lift aft.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 10:18 AM
|
#3
|
Guru
City: Northport
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,046
|
We had them on 3 boats and there were pros and cons....
Good
- "V" struts very stable on ours
- depth clearance
- some prop protection
- better prop angle
Poor
- slightly less efficient
- inability to maneuver as well
- cannot walk the boats stern well at all
I would get one again but I would research the particular vessel and be aware of the limitations.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 10:51 AM
|
#4
|
Valued Technical Contributor
City: Litchfield, Ct
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,786
|
I had them on two of my last boats: Mainship 34T and Pilot 34. The 34T had no negative issues that I can think of and all of the positives noted above. The Pilot 34 had prop clearance and/or cavitation issues but wasn't so bad.
David
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 10:55 AM
|
#5
|
Guru
City: Ft Pierce
Vessel Name: Sold
Vessel Model: Was an Albin/PSN 40
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 28,151
|
on the twins I have operated with them...you definitely needed wheel with split shifting to get a decent turn.
and the reduced dynamic lift on some ay affect top speeds but I had nothing to really compare them to.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 11:17 AM
|
#6
|
Enigma
City: Slicker?
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,566
|
Greetings,
Mr. B. We have a 23' Penn Yan single with "Tunnel Drive". All of the above comments plus, you're limited to a maximum prop size for appropriate clearance between prop tips and hull. Shallow running is THE plus IMO.
On plane, I'm drawing about 1'.
Sister ship:
__________________
RTF
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 01:15 PM
|
#7
|
Guru
City: Boston Area
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,610
|
Thanks everyone!
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 01:20 PM
|
#8
|
Technical Guru
City: Wilmington, NC
Vessel Name: Louisa
Vessel Model: Custom Built 38
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,194
|
I built a tunnel into my single. No complaints but prop noise is pretty bad from 22kts up to top end of 29-30kts. I just cruise around 18-20kts and noise is not too bad.
Some tunnels are short and water has to make an abrupt change of direction, this increases noise and eats hp. Mine starts gently under the engine, and tunnel is over 10' long.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 01:24 PM
|
#9
|
Guru
City: Reedville, VA
Vessel Name: Wingspan
Vessel Model: Aluminum Catamaran
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 580
|
I've never spent much time operating boats with tunnels/pockets. But most of the pros and cons mentioned above are consistent with what I've heard from owner/operators. I'll add one more, depending on construction method they can be more expensive due to increased man hours.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 01:41 PM
|
#10
|
Guru
City: Upstate,SC
Vessel Name: Shipoopi
Vessel Model: derilic sailboat
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,884
|
An alternative to the tunnel is the Seabright or Higgins style hull. They used a box keel to both lower the engine for a straighter shaft run to the prop and to protect the prop. They are also considered a shoal draft hull. This type hull is not limited to small boats. Higgins used the design on landing craft and other large boats during WWII. Atkins has a lot of stock plans for boats that use this type hull.
__________________
This is my signature line. There are many like it but this one is mine.
What a pain in the transom.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 02:42 PM
|
#11
|
Guru
City: Rockport
Vessel Name: Ana
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT Firefly
Greetings,
Mr. B. We have a 23' Penn Yan single with "Tunnel Drive". All of the above comments plus, you're limited to a maximum prop size for appropriate clearance between prop tips and hull. Shallow running is THE plus IMO.
On plane, I'm drawing about 1'.
Sister ship:
|
I once had a Penn Yan tunnel drive, on Keuka Lake no less.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 04:48 PM
|
#12
|
Guru
City: San Diego
Vessel Name: Circuit Breaker
Vessel Model: 2021..22' Duffy Cuddy cabin
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayview
IMO they reduce prop walk so that maneuvering is only done by spin not the side thrust possible with an open prop.
|
I don't experience that same problem with my tunnels as the props are not mounted close to the top of the tunnel which reduces the constant pounding against the hull that water flying off the blades makes. Also, prop walk is good, for the same reason.
I had a 35' Tiara years ago that had tunnels and was a little noisey & needed some help when trying to walk the hull with the prop. I would still buy another "tunneled" hull but only after satisfying myself that the prop blades are sufficiently distant from the hull bottom.
__________________
Done with diesel power boats! Have fallen in love with all electric!
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 04:54 PM
|
#13
|
Guru
City: Northport
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codger2
I don't experience that same problem with my tunnels as the props are not mounted close to the top of the tunnel which reduces the constant pounding against the hull that water flying off the blades makes. Also, prop walk is good, for the same reason.
I had a 35' Tiara years ago that had tunnels and was a little noisey & needed some help when trying to walk the hull with the prop. I would still buy another "tunneled" hull but only after satisfying myself that the prop blades are sufficiently distant from the hull bottom.
|
Yes - very shallow tunnels , barely there at all.
|
|
|
02-19-2019, 05:04 PM
|
#14
|
Guru
City: Cape May, NJ
Vessel Name: Irish Lady
Vessel Model: Monk 36
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,966
|
My Phoenix 29 had tunnels which had a nasty habit of sucking air on a moderate beam sea. You had to slow down to about 11 knots from a normal 17 cruise in 3-5's. Other than that the plus side was the engines were in the cockpit, out of the cabin. The cabin was much larger than a comparable Bertram 28. Never had any trouble docking as long as both engines were running.
__________________
Archie
Irish Lady
1984 Monk 36 Hull #46
Currently in Cape May, NJ
|
|
|
02-20-2019, 05:37 PM
|
#15
|
Veteran Member
City: New Haven
Vessel Name: Chesapeake
Vessel Model: Mainship 30 Pilot II
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 95
|
Prop Pockets/Tunnel Drives
Starting in 2003 the Mainship 30 Pilot ll added a tunnel with a 5 blade prop. It’s nice to bring her in close to shore when anchoring at the beach. Having the tunnel means it has as a fairly short keel so the stern tends to walk a bit in rolling seas. If there is any extra noise due to the blade distance in the tunnel I don’t know as I have nothing to compare it to though I have read the 5 blade minimizes noise and vibration. The original Pilot had a 4 blade prop with a full keel and no tunnel that was known to suffer from vibration due to the distance of the prop to the hull.
|
|
|
02-21-2019, 09:46 AM
|
#16
|
Guru
City: Anacortes
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
|
Adding blades typically reduces vibration by increasing balance, but at the expense of efficiency and drag. The downside of tunnels, is limiting the size of the prop you can fit with an increased need to manage the flow over the prop since you have effects from the tunnel itself. Adding a blade increases surface area without having to further increase the diameter. You can then play with cupping and rake to get the tight flow around the prop until you kill any cavitation picked up along the way.
|
|
|
02-21-2019, 09:52 AM
|
#17
|
Guru
City: Anacortes
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,189
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish53
I once had a Penn Yan tunnel drive, on Keuka Lake no less.
|
Greetings earthlings. I had a 23 once too. One of the deepest tunnels and I can confidently say that your 23 draws closer to 14 inches, having used that extra couple inches a time or two.
The Penn Yan was a much harder boat to get the prop right than most of the shallower tunnels out there. It does sort of sing when you get it right though.
I once went clean over a log hiding in the chop at around 24 kts without so much as a nick on the prop. Fun boat, but finicky.
|
|
|
02-21-2019, 09:58 AM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
City: Norfolk, VA
Vessel Model: Bayliner 3870
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 308
|
My 3870 has prop pockets...what I would consider "real" pockets. Sideways motion requires more throttle, but I also have a full length keel. For my size boat, and the horsepower, I think my props are too small. The efficiency (or is it the slip calc?) is something like 60%? But the tunnels don't allow anymore diameter than 20" which is a pretty tiny prop once you get it off the boat. Cummins repowers require something like a 26" pitch since the you can't bump the diameter.
Just my observation.
|
|
|
02-21-2019, 10:10 AM
|
#19
|
Guru
City: Northport
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cool beans
My 3870 has prop pockets...what I would consider "real" pockets. Sideways motion requires more throttle, but I also have a full length keel. For my size boat, and the horsepower, I think my props are too small. The efficiency (or is it the slip calc?) is something like 60%? But the tunnels don't allow anymore diameter than 20" which is a pretty tiny prop once you get it off the boat. Cummins repowers require something like a 26" pitch since the you can't bump the diameter.
Just my observation.
|
A number of the 38's with 175 diesels had 21" diameter props.
But they really do not need to be more than 20" diameter - I would guess that your pitch is in the 21" range as well with 4 blade Nibral props.
Slip is not efficiency but I think your slip calculation is higher than it really is - take into account your actual prop pitch (scanned) your verified rpm and trans ratios at the highest rpm.
You will never get a good slip calculation when the boat is at or near transition speeds.
|
|
|
02-21-2019, 11:23 AM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
City: Norfolk, VA
Vessel Model: Bayliner 3870
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty477
A number of the 38's with 175 diesels had 21" diameter props.
But they really do not need to be more than 20" diameter - I would guess that your pitch is in the 21" range as well with 4 blade Nibral props.
Slip is not efficiency but I think your slip calculation is higher than it really is - take into account your actual prop pitch (scanned) your verified rpm and trans ratios at the highest rpm.
You will never get a good slip calculation when the boat is at or near transition speeds.
|
Ah, didn't know that! Yes, they were 20x22 nakashima that I had repitched to 20x20. She didn't like getting up on plane. I live aboard and have a lot of crap with me. I also anticipate getting heavier :/
I had my numbers backwards...calc'd slip is like 40%. That's 2800 rpm @ 18 mph. Assuming my tachs are good enough. Starboard engine needs a tune or adjustment. I'll be on the BOF for that though
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Trawler Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|