Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-01-2017, 10:58 AM   #61
Guru
 
BandB's Avatar
 
City: Fort Lauderdale. Florida, USA
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trundlebug View Post
Not wanting to cause an argument, but I disagree.


Proper filters remove water. That's not difficult to achieve yourself, you really don't need to engage the expensive services of a professional who makes it sound complicated.
And I disagree and there is far more to polishing than just removing water. Removing water is easy. Removing sludge not that hard. Restoring quality to the fuel more difficult, leaving the tanks clean and the fuel clean and with all the characteristics of new far more difficult.

You're right, if all one is doing is removing water, then the charges for polishing are very high, but in most cases when professionals are called, more than water removal is needed.

You are also correct in pointing out the value of coalescers in addition to centrifuges.

Polishing is the careful removal of non-combustible contaminates below levels stated in ASTM D975 (Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils) while re-suspending (keeping) combustible contaminates to maintain ASTM standards for BTU value, lubricity, and cetane. The main difference between polishing and filtering is that fuel polishing acknowledges that fuel itself can degrade/consolidate (clump together into solids) and that it needs to be kept, where as fuel filtering does not. Fuel polishing recognizes that combustible contaminates should be changed back to their original form and re-suspended in the fuel so the fuel stays within industry specifications and functions as it’s intended to. Fuel filtering ignores that and simply pulls all contaminates out without regard for their value to the fuel and the engine.

Now the other task typically being paid for that pushes the price up in the cleaning of the tank. You have fuel problems, clean the fuel, put it back in a dirty tank and you haven't completed the task. True professionals are going to clean your tank or tanks.

If someone just got a little water in their last fuel purchase, then complete polishing isn't required. It can all be filtered. However, if someone has a recurring problem, and most often if they're dealing with fuel and a tank that have set for years unused or someone has issues with other contaminants then more is often required. Professional polishing and tank cleaning is expensive but justifies itself if really needed. If that's not needed then there are cheaper solutions.

We have an Alfa Laval system on the boat we're on at the moment, because we do cruise often outside the US and fuel in many different areas plus we make longer ocean runs. We don't have a polishing system, just a good filtration system, on boats that never leave the US and never venture far offshore.
BandB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 01:19 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Knot Salted's Avatar
 
City: Muskegon, MI
Vessel Name: Knot Salted
Vessel Model: 1981 Californian 34 LRC
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Looks like 'bugs'. Biological activity in diesel is only possible when free moisture is present. The critters live in the water, and eat the fuel. It is never algae unless you have light in your tanks. 300 varieties of yeasts, molds, fungi, and bacteria are the culprits. Get tanks clean, then always use a good non-alcohol additive that has glycol ether (jet fuel de-icer) in it. Add just before fueling at recomended dosage for severe conditions. This is safe for all fuel and injection systems of all ages. The de-icer dissolves the water into the fuel where the bugs cannot use it, and it safely passes through to the combustion chamber and out the exhaust. Most will also contain metal deactivators, corrosion inhibitors, lubricity agents, stabilizers and detergents for the injectors. This will make a real difference in reliability, durability, and even in fuel consumption rates.
Knot Salted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 05:35 AM   #63
FF
Guru
 
FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
"The de-icer dissolves the water into the fuel where the bugs cannot use it, and it safely passes through to the combustion chamber and out the exhaust."

Emulsifying tiny water might work, but with more serious water the temperature in the injector tip can cause the water to boil. And become steam.

Blown off injector tips does happen.
FF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 06:04 AM   #64
Senior Member
 
nodestination's Avatar
 
City: Green Cove Springs,FL
Vessel Name: No Destination
Vessel Model: 1972 GulfStar Trawler 36
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 199
I paid $400 for tank cleaning and fuel polishing. I got 250g tank. For $4000, you can buy your own polishing machine.
nodestination is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 06:14 AM   #65
Guru
 
Steve DAntonio's Avatar


 
City: Deltaville
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunchaser View Post
Steve

When will your shore power transformer article be available?
This article is now available in the Ocean Voyager digital edition, available here...

http://www.navigatorpublishing.com/o...tal_editon.pdf
__________________
Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting, Inc.
https://www.stevedmarineconsulting.com
Steve DAntonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 08:29 AM   #66
Senior Member
 
Knot Salted's Avatar
 
City: Muskegon, MI
Vessel Name: Knot Salted
Vessel Model: 1981 Californian 34 LRC
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Right, but not with the jet fuel de icing component.
We and the industry have been doing this in commercial on and off road and passeger diesels for decades.
Knot Salted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 10:30 AM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Trundlebug's Avatar
 
City: River Trent
Vessel Model: Profile 33
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 31
Removal of the moisture at source is intrinsically better, I would suggest, than treating the moisture with a special additive.

As I said, if there's no water, the bugs can't be there.
Trundlebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2017, 10:33 AM   #68
Senior Member
 
Knot Salted's Avatar
 
City: Muskegon, MI
Vessel Name: Knot Salted
Vessel Model: 1981 Californian 34 LRC
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 322
Removal of the moisture at source is intrinsically better, I would suggest, than treating the moisture with a special additive.

As I said, if there's no water, the bugs can't be there.


Yes. Then the additives help prevent future accumulation via entrained or introduced moisture.
Knot Salted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 06:26 AM   #69
FF
Guru
 
FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
"I would suggest, than treating the moisture with a special additive."

If only it were that simple.

An emulsifier will grab the water and carry it to the engine where perhaps the filter can stop the water.

If it doesen't it gets really expensive.

A de emulsifier will drop the water out of suspension to the tank bottom, where you have to figure out how to remove it.

Only the de emulsifier can handle big water in the fuel .

With no chemicals and only time a sump can remove big water or little water at no expense, besides effort and time.
FF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 07:06 AM   #70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trundlebug View Post
Removal of the moisture at source is intrinsically better, I would suggest, than treating the moisture with a special additive.

As I said, if there's no water, the bugs can't be there.
Trundlebug, it's always good to provide full information at the point.
This is not a matter of water only, it's an issue with oxygen of water AND air as already stated in post #39.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilou View Post
Bacteria found in our fuel and water tanks need source of energy to develop and grow. Those bacteria, called 'aerobic bacteria', mostly & usually get energy from oxygen of air & water.

However bacteria do need time to multiply to achieve a sufficiently large population by their dividing process then through a chain reaction to have a strong corrosive effect on the surface of the tanks walls.

Therefore by keeping our tanks full of fuel which reduce the volume of air, also by frequently draining off the remaining condensation water & water in fuel, this is depriving them of essential resources then bacteria are no longer being to develop.
User915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 07:16 AM   #71
Guru
 
Steve DAntonio's Avatar


 
City: Deltaville
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by FF View Post
"The de-icer dissolves the water into the fuel where the bugs cannot use it, and it safely passes through to the combustion chamber and out the exhaust."

Emulsifying tiny water might work, but with more serious water the temperature in the injector tip can cause the water to boil. And become steam.

Blown off injector tips does happen.
With respect for FF's knowledge and practical experience, while the is no doubt that water can wreak havoc with fuel injection systems, and water emulsifier additives carry with them liabilities, primarily why would one would encourage water to mix with fuel when we expend a great deal of effort to install and maintain water separation fuel filters, the 'water boils and turns to steam in an injector and blows the tip off' is a long-held, and often repeated misconception. At the pressure found inside an injector, it is impossible for steam to exist. Water is just plain bad in fuel, emulsified or not. It's best to make every effort to drain it from tank bottoms and catch it in filters, rather than inducing it to pass through the fuel injection system.
__________________
Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting, Inc.
https://www.stevedmarineconsulting.com
Steve DAntonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 08:46 AM   #72
Guru
 
rwidman's Avatar
 
City: North Charleston, SC
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,870
It would be great if boat fuel tanks had a sump at the lowest point and a means to drain any water out of them, but in reality, most do not. Mine don't, they are rectangular tanks with flat bottoms.


This leaves me with filters, chemicals and trying to keep water out in the first place.


The fuel fill plates are directly under the flybridge drains. U till a few weeks ago, I couldn't take on fuel in the rain. I finally got the bright idea of buying rubber stoppers for the drain hoses. I'm a little better off now.
rwidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 09:17 AM   #73
Guru
 
City: .
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesK View Post
It would be great if boat fuel tanks had a sump at the lowest point and a means to drain any water out of them.
Yes ! +1
Yahoo 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 11:50 AM   #74
Senior Member
 
The Other Gary's Avatar
 
City: Toronto
Vessel Name: Adios Dinero
Vessel Model: Bayliner 3988 2 x 330 Cummins
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 336
And maintaining the O rings on filler caps is a priority as well or the next deck wash may end up in the tank with many fuel fill setups.
The Other Gary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 12:00 PM   #75
FF
Guru
 
FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
"It would be great if boat fuel tanks had a sump at the lowest point and a means to drain any water out of them." Yes but that would asd price to the vessel.

Unless the first purchaser is knowledgable enough to demand a marine fuel tank, instead of a box for fuel,a box is what you get.

Some folks tanks get so bad they install an aftermarket port to clean the tank, doesn't seem it would be big bucks to install a low point drain at the same time. A plug in the drain valve might be a good safety.

Installing a low point suction pipe down thru the fill pipe might also be possible with the tank open to place the end properly.
FF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 12:45 PM   #76
Guru
 
rwidman's Avatar
 
City: North Charleston, SC
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,870
In my case and probably many others, the bottom of the tank is flat and rests on a flat surface. The only way to provide a sump and drain would be to raise the tank and reduce capacity.


As far as "demanding" anything, it's unlikely you will get it unless you're having a custom boat built.
rwidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2017, 05:40 AM   #77
FF
Guru
 
FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22,553
"As far as "demanding" anything, it's unlikely you will get it unless you're having a custom boat built."

Perhaps , back when most of the TT were built hulls would be popped and passed to different yards even used as wedding presents.

If the groom could complete and sell the boat , he was then in business.

The brokers would sell boats yet to be built, so semi custom was really simple , although it might be a year to get the boat.

I never purchased one of these boats but commissioned a bunch.

If the current Orential boat market is similar all that would be required is a good drawing of a real fuel tank with self servicing sump, so they could copy it.

The folks replacing a shot fuel box might easily have a fuel tank created.

One method could be a bladder in the old fuel box , , no sump , but if contaminated it could be removed and cleaned.
FF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2017, 06:41 AM   #78
Guru
 
Steve DAntonio's Avatar


 
City: Deltaville
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesK View Post
It would be great if boat fuel tanks had a sump at the lowest point and a means to drain any water out of them, but in reality, most do not. Mine don't, they are rectangular tanks with flat bottoms.

This leaves me with filters, chemicals and trying to keep water out in the first place.

The fuel fill plates are directly under the flybridge drains. U till a few weeks ago, I couldn't take on fuel in the rain. I finally got the bright idea of buying rubber stoppers for the drain hoses. I'm a little better off now.
WesK: On nearly all new and after build fuel polishing systems I've installed, I've included what's referred to as a stripper tube. This is a tube that's permanently installed, which extends to the bottom of the tank, closer to the bottom than the pick up tube, and preferably to the lowest part of the tank (in a well if I'm designing the tank, if the tank is being designed, a drain can be incorporated into the well, in place of the pickup tube, if space permits) where water will accumulate. If not used with a polishing system, it can be a stand-alone device plumbed to either a hand pump, or an oil change pump. Operated regularly, and briefly, it will tell you very quickly if water is present, and running it until clear fuel emerges will remove that water.

The tube is typically installed in the existing inspection port (doing so enables the port to be removed and brought into the shop for installation of a welding boss, eliminating the need to weld on the tank, and aboard the boat), even if on the tank side , with a 90 deg. pick up, or a dedicated inspection port can be installed, tank top or side, as a platform for the tube. This isn't theory, I've done all of this on many occasions.

An explanation of these systems (along with photos of the 90 degree pick ups and systems) are shown in this article Fuel Polishing Systems Explained | Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting

Additional system installation photos are shown in this article as well, similar text but written for the marine industry http://stevedmarineconsulting.com/wp...PBB112_opt.pdf

And while we're at it, this article, again written for the industry, covers centrifugal filters http://stevedmarineconsulting.com/wp...ters115_05.pdf
__________________
Steve D'Antonio Marine Consulting, Inc.
https://www.stevedmarineconsulting.com
Steve DAntonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2017, 07:13 AM   #79
Guru
 
angus99's Avatar
 
City: Signal Mtn., TN
Vessel Name: Stella Maris
Vessel Model: Defever 44
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,742
Thanks, Steve, for solving something I've been wrestling with. Been wondering how to install a fitting that will pull water/fuel from the bottom of the tank and into the polishing system--but thought adding another fitting to the tanks would be expensive and still likely not drain whatever's on the bottom. The plate-mounted pickups look like a great solution.

(There are actually some older fittings near the bottom of our saddle tanks that are plugged with fiberglass. I'm assuming they were the original fuel outlets but were picking up too much crud that close to the bottom--and still not draining water that might have been on the very bottom. The photo is rotated 90 degrees clockwise.)

Thanks, too, for your excellent presentation on running gear at last week's Defever rendezvous.
Attached Thumbnails
IMG_1572.jpg  
angus99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2017, 04:20 PM   #80
Guru
 
dhays's Avatar
 
City: Gig Harbor
Vessel Name: Kinship
Vessel Model: North Pacific 43
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Other Gary View Post
And maintaining the O rings on filler caps is a priority as well or the next deck wash may end up in the tank with many fuel fill setups.
This is something that I am notoriously bad at doing. I need to see about replacing all my O rings on the boat simply because I doubt they have been changed since the boat was new.

I am fortunate that my fuel fills are in the aft cockpit out of the weather.
__________________
Regards,

Dave
SPOT page
dhays is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Trawler Port Captains
Port Captains are TF volunteers who can serve as local guides or assist with local arrangements and information. Search below to locate Port Captains near your destination. To learn more about this program read here: TF Port Captain Program





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2006 - 2012